On 12/02/2010 05:48 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
So,
As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in
parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented
features into re-writing them into C++, I was
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
--with-openl is now on be default for MacOS in the bootstrap
configure.in. This actually break on MacOS.
There is a patch in dev300/. that seems to address this problem. The
attach patches integrate this patch.
Since I have no expertise in this part of the code, I'd
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote:
I agree. However can we see what we lose with java enabled builds
(diskspace, performance, startup time)?
Random facts - here, java-1_6_0-sun-1.6.0.u22 is a major offender in
powertop, with apparently some GC timer running very frequently.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
Hi all,
On 2010-12-02 at 21:59 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
So just in case, let's agree to disagree keep the patches coming!
:)
As a conclusion, what about to combine Miklos' check for the missing
documentation with a commit hook, so that it does not allow you to
commit _new_ files
Hi Alex,
On 2010-12-02 at 21:00 +, Alex Hudson wrote:
Maybe it deserves a wiki page on its own?
Sure, go ahead, and link it from the Easy_Hacks's task, please; I'd
think of
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks/Installer
but whatever you choose ;-)
Thank you,
Kendy
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
As a conclusion, what about to combine Miklos' check for the missing
documentation with a commit hook, so that it does not allow you to
commit _new_ files without (at least the high level) documentation? ;-)
Hi Kendy,
I find it surprising me actually saying this, but -
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 23:45 +, Andy Hearn wrote:
For a multiple-page document, with at least some lengthy notes:
- Place the cursor within a note in the sidebar, and then try to
scroll down the document using the vertical scroll bar either by
clicking on the down arrow, or using the
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 21:54 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Caolan, Michael, Miklos,
Could you please have a look at the patch attached to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32039 ?
Looks sane to me. But you guys know this code better than me.
C.
Hi Caolan,
took your patch, handled one more case - could you please review
commit to libreoffice-3-3 if ok?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
From 25ae4e3bf1632150aa54769ed5b3235cbfa2af2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Caol=C3=A1n=20McNamara?= caol...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:15:24
On 03/12/10 02:26, Kevin Hunter wrote:
I'm absolutely for this, especially in terms of getting any/all
necessaries rewritten in C++ ... but not right now. As others have
stated, like it not, the current product uses Java (e.g. Base) and I
believe it would be foolhardy to default to a build
Sure, go ahead, and link it from the Easy_Hacks's task, please; I'd
think of
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks/Installer
Please, let's avoid potential confusion and not call the pile of Perl an
installer, though. I changed the Easy Hacks page to call it an installer
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:50:24 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Aren't you mixing up two orthogonal issues here? Whether to use Java when
building LibreOffice, and whether to have and distribute parts of the
LibreOffice end product requiring a Java runtime.
Isn't Java used during the build also
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:28 +, Wols Lists wrote:
Where do I start :-)
Seeing as Base is where I want to work, this seems an obvious thing to
do. I'm guessing that building without Java, then running some tests
(smoketest? what?) and seeing what breaks is a good idea.
I think the typical
What fun,
It seems this is rather a polarising question, so of course it makes
sense to pause and think it through some more; here is my attempt to
summarise the major arguments their stake-holders :-)
A. it makes LibreOffice easier to build, to not require Java
+ I made this
On 03/12/10 10:48, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:28 +, Wols Lists wrote:
Where do I start :-)
Seeing as Base is where I want to work, this seems an obvious thing to
do. I'm guessing that building without Java, then running some tests
(smoketest? what?) and seeing what
Hi Kevin,
On 2010-12-01 at 19:14 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
Updated expressions in bootstrap/g so that it uses Bash internal
expressions, rather than farming out to the '[' or 'test' external
command.
Updated deprecated backtick subshell calls to $(
I've just learned of/realized the
Hi, :-)
I was just wondering if there are any updates about progress with the
WikiHelp? ;-)
David Nelson
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:03 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 01:32 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
I'm asking because I guess the more complex to run it, the fewer people
will actually try it out at all.
True. I was sort of wondering about potential colossal size. But sure I
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:57 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
closing them all in a big long churning run every now and then would
catch a ton of bugs for us :-)
Any volunteers to play with it ?
Hmm; perhaps this is just all .docx stuff since these are the first
files in the test suite;
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:57 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
It failed after only a handful of documents on the attached with:
#0 0xabd83b95 in
writerfilter::dmapper::DomainMapper_Impl::finishParagraph(boost::shared_ptrwriterfilter::dmapper::PropertyMap)
()
from
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
I find it surprising me actually saying this, but - for the while, I
think this would be crossing the line of solving a social problem
by technical means. ;)
Additionally I'm not aware of a method to
Hi Wols, *,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
On 03/12/10 02:26, Kevin Hunter wrote:
[...]
Seeing as Base is where I want to work, this seems an obvious thing to
do. I'm guessing that building without Java, then running some tests
(smoketest? what?)
i was talking to kendy this morning on irc and i was told that java is
eventually going to be phased out its a matter of porting the code from
java to c++. What i would be flustered with is where to begin in my
honest opinion
On 12/3/10 2:00 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Wols, *,
On Fri,
Sorry I don't like my colour :)
On (2010-12-03 11:49), Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
http://libreoffice.org/credits.html has been updated. On Wol's request
it contains now the last commit date too, to see how up to date it is.
This is the first version without the build repo being included in the
Hi Jonathan, *,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
i was talking to kendy this morning on irc and i was told that java is
eventually going to be phased out its a matter of porting the code from java
to c++. What i would be flustered with is where to
On 03/12/10 12:11, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
I find it surprising me actually saying this, but - for the while, I
think this would be crossing the line of solving a social problem
by technical means. ;)
Hi Christian,
On 2010-12-03 at 14:40 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Start with stuff that /any/ user would see.
My list would start with:
Fulltext search in Help (i.e. F1) - that uses lucene and requires java
That one might be actually easy - when the wikihelp is online, I'd
default to not
Hi Miklos, Thorsten,
On 2010-12-03 at 13:11 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
I find it surprising me actually saying this, but - for the while, I
think this would be crossing the line of solving a social problem
by technical means. ;)
Additionally I'm not aware of a method to tell doxygen to
Hi *,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Christian,
On 2010-12-03 at 14:40 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Start with stuff that /any/ user would see.
My list would start with:
Fulltext search in Help (i.e. F1) - that uses lucene and requires java
Hi Kenneth,
thanks for the patch, perfect as far as I could see so it is pushed
thanks,
Noel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:03 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
A. it makes LibreOffice easier to build, to not require Java
+ I made this point, Spaetz has some examples of build failure
with different Javas / Ant (that speak of much frustration
and
wasted time), Jonathan
Thanks! Which brings me to my next question: on scroll-down, do we want the
cursor to remain in view, or go up with the containing note?
I'm wary of altering this- not after reading the passionate (dis)attachments
we have for status bar icons :-)
On Dec 3, 2010 10:19 AM, Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:49 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
http://libreoffice.org/credits.html has been updated. On Wol's request
it contains now the last commit date too, to see how up to date it is.
This is the first version without the build repo being included in the
analyses (just the
Yes please. I have this diff too, so just push it to both master and stable.
On (2010-12-03 15:39), Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to push the attached patch to bootstrap.
Currently, when finding X (on all platforms but WIN32, DARWIN with
Aqua and OS2), CFLAGS and LDFLAGS are
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 15:39 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
I'd like to push the attached patch to bootstrap.
Patch looks great to me :-)
The compiler and linker sometimes need some help in finding some
Sure; looks like a no-brainer / bug :-)
ATB,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 09:32 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Kohei Yoshida
Commits: 643
Joined: 2009-06-19
In the previous stats my joined date was sometime in 2006 (which sounded
Riight - I think excluding the 'build' directory from the stats
counting is prolly rather a mistake :-)
Hi Michael,
On 2010-12-03 at 13:57 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Start with stuff that /any/ user would see.
My list would start with:
This is a great list :-) we should get some of it into the easy hacks
page I suspect (under the not so easy hacks).
Fulltext search in Help (i.e.
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Thomas Klausner w...@netbsd.org
wrote:
I looked at the Makefile target and saw that it wants to run
./bootstrap, so I did that manually; after a successful finish, gmake
now dies with:
gmake: *** [src/downloaded] Error 1
Ditto.
I can
Hi Kohei,
On 2010-12-03 at 09:46 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Fix for fdo#31308 needs review. The patch is very trivial, and looks
safe enough to me.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31308
Reviewed, comment added to bugzilla - can you please push?
Thank you,
Kendy
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 03:04:55PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
That's why I highlighted that this would be done only with _new_ files,
ie. the files that have have been git add'ed, and did not exist in the
repository before. And we can further limit that only to .hxx/.h.
Ah,
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:32:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote:
Hmm. My stat looks weird.
Kohei Yoshida
Commits: 643
Joined: 2009-06-19
Yep, incredible but true, that happened when taking away the build
repo. Per IRC discussion added back in. Stats are back to normal.
Hi Miklos,
On 2010-12-03 at 16:19 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
That's why I highlighted that this would be done only with _new_ files,
ie. the files that have have been git add'ed, and did not exist in the
repository before. And we can further limit that only to .hxx/.h.
Ah, that makes a
Hi Sebastian,
On 2010-12-03 at 16:21 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Hmm. My stat looks weird.
Kohei Yoshida
Commits: 643
Joined: 2009-06-19
Yep, incredible but true,
One of the reasons is that during the cvs - svn and svn - hg
conversions, the history had been cut just to the
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:13 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Kohei,
On 2010-12-03 at 09:46 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Fix for fdo#31308 needs review. The patch is very trivial, and looks
safe enough to me.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31308
Reviewed, comment
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:44 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On 2010-12-03 at 16:21 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Hmm. My stat looks weird.
Kohei Yoshida
Commits: 643
Joined: 2009-06-19
Yep, incredible but true,
One of the reasons is that during the cvs -
Hi Miklos,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:04 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Trivial fix for the bootstrap repo attached, does it look sane?
Prolly better to get the download script to create that itself ? [ and
AFAIR the BSD'ers don't like mkdir -p ;-) ]
But great that you identified the
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:23 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi all,
On 2010-12-02 at 21:59 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
So just in case, let's agree to disagree keep the patches coming!
:)
As a conclusion, what about to combine Miklos' check for the missing
documentation with a
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:08 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 10:23 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi all,
On 2010-12-02 at 21:59 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
So just in case, let's agree to disagree keep the patches coming!
:)
As a conclusion, what about to
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:07:08PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Miklos,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:04 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Trivial fix for the bootstrap repo attached, does it look sane?
Prolly better to get the download script to create that itself ? [ and
AFAIR the BSD'ers
Kohei Yoshida píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 10:51 -0500:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:36 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi,
you have probably already noticed that I created the LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1
git tag for LibO-3.3-rc1 release. The builds are still running and
should be available in the beginning
surensp...@gmail.com wrote:
I shall touch base with you on the IRC and will implement all the
tweaks as you suggest. If there are any best practices wiki link,
please guide me to that :)
There are one or two other things that could benefit from looking
into, e.g. the usage of the worker
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:14:12AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
wrote:
My rationale: Many times when I work on feature branches, I commit stuff
but intentionally not provide documentation because the role of the
class/method/whatever may change during the course of the
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:13AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
wrote:
It is enough?
I can deal with it, but making it identical with the git tag would make
it much easier.
BTW, what is the reason the tag is LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 instead of
libreoffice-3.3.0.1? IIRC cvs did not
Hi kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (03-12-10 14:52)
That one might be actually easy - when the wikihelp is online, I'd
default to not building the internal help at all, and instead focus on
converting it from the wiki version to the platform-native (Windows /
MacOSX / Gnome / KDE [but IIRC, KDE
Kohei Yoshida píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 11:34 -0500:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 17:25 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Kohei Yoshida píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 10:51 -0500:
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 16:36 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi,
you have probably already noticed that I created the
Miklos Vajna píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 17:38 +0100:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:13AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com
wrote:
It is enough?
I can deal with it, but making it identical with the git tag would make
it much easier.
BTW, what is the reason the tag is
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 05:51:48PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
The information is there in slightly different form, see the attached
screenshot. The version in libreoffice-build-versions has exactly the
same value as the VERSION in the LIBREOFFICE_VERSION tag.
[...]
What others think? ;-)
Replying to myself, if I redo the make, I get
anth...@ashdown ~/gitstuff/lojava $ make
build -- version: 275224
Fetching dependencies for module l10n from solver... failed
=
Building module testautomation
=
make: *** [all] Error 141
anth...@ashdown ~/gitstuff/lojava $
Hi Thorsten,
On 12/03/2010 10:03 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Suren,
so, just pushed your patches to master - added two tweaks:
* FileChangedChecker moved out to
svtools/source/misc/filechangedchecker.cxx
* and to make it not rely on writer internals, using a generic
callback
As mentioned in a separate thread your going to have issues with Base if
you disable Java.
On 12/03/2010 06:47 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
Replying to myself again ...
And it appears to be a java problem ... changing the autogen arguments
to --without-java and it's gone away ...
Cheers,
Wol
On
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:34 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I can deal with it, but making it identical with the git tag would make
it much easier.
I guess; why not. Though it IS ALLCAPS :-) and git tag -l is not so
very difficult to type (right?). We should prolly prefix it with: 'Tag:'
Thanks to review and push it quite quickly if possible.
Changes have been done (for RTL_OUSTRING_...) without looking that the
namespace rtl is not declared.
I did not introduced it but just corrected the entries, since I am not
enough familiar to know which is the prefered situation within the
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
As to the crossing the line - the first time it won't let you commit,
and you'll be angry, the second time it won't let you commit, and you'll
just fix that, and the third time you'll comment just naturally, and
won't even hit the check :-) This worked with the warnings
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 20:46 +0100, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:
Thanks to review and push it quite quickly if possible.
Changes have been done (for RTL_OUSTRING_...) without looking that the
namespace rtl is not declared.
Yes, this fixes the build error. I actually fixed it up a minute or two
I wonder. Is the download script flakey?
My internet has been a little bit iffey these last few days (we're not
used to half an inch of snow over here :-) and it looks as though it's
fallen over. Notice the Read error below - at which point downloading
seems to have stopped instantly, and
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:13 +, Wols Lists wrote:
But, having dug as deep as I can, these two functions seem to be mere
shims to call the equivalent java functions, and seem to have been added
either for code that is now obsolete, or (more likely) in readiness for
future use. Either way, I
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 20:20 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
The attached makes it get much further.
It's probably caused by unset returning an error and that error being
returned outside, so the chain stops.
So I add an echo that can't fail at the end of the script.
What fun :-) does
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 21:09 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hm, it's not a complete fix.
This way, I at least get a git checkout and tarfiles, but then:
..
build -- version: 275224
ERROR: dmake: Command not found. Please rerun bootstrap
Hmm, do you have dmake/dmake - and
Just redone. No obvious error - same crash :-(
Cheers,
Wol
On 03/12/10 20:12, Wols Lists wrote:
I wonder. Is the download script flakey?
My internet has been a little bit iffey these last few days (we're not
used to half an inch of snow over here :-) and it looks as though it's
fallen over.
Petr Mladek wrote:
libreoffice-3-3 git branch is still opened for fixes. Just please, send
your patches for review to this mailing list before you commit. You
might ask a particular person for review via CC or on the irc channel
#libreoffice.
Hi Petr, all,
it would then be nice if the
This is quite interesting Sebastian. I'm on Kubuntu on my netbook and i
am using the openjdk. From what i have asked in the past about java jre
and jdk you can have multiple versions installed. on mac for instance it
comes with both the 32bit and 64bit jdk and jre.
On 12/2/10 8:22 PM,
Cheers,
Good to see that I am not the only one.
Before my building on cppunit.
Now I have exact the same problem as you. I can not find a way out. Hope
that someone comes with an idea.
I think it has to do with i10n and en_US.UTF8, but that is only a guess.
Michael advised strace -f -e file make
On 03/12/10 21:17, Joost Eekhoorn wrote:
Cheers,
Good to see that I am not the only one.
Before my building on cppunit.
Now I have exact the same problem as you. I can not find a way out.
Hope that someone comes with an idea.
I think it has to do with i10n and en_US.UTF8, but that is only a
On 03/12/10 21:17, Joost Eekhoorn wrote:
Cheers,
Good to see that I am not the only one.
Before my building on cppunit.
Now I have exact the same problem as you. I can not find a way out.
Hope that someone comes with an idea.
I think it has to do with i10n and en_US.UTF8, but that is only a
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:31:12PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hmm, do you have dmake/dmake
Yes.
- and do you also have it in your
solver/./bin directory ? (where bootstrap should copy it if it
succeeds ...).
No, that's the only copy:
# find . -name dmake
./dmake
./dmake/dmake
#
Hi Sebastian, *,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:31:02 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:45:17 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
would
Hi Wols, *,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
Replying to myself again ...
And it appears to be a java problem ... changing the autogen arguments
to --without-java and it's gone away ...
Sure that this is the reason, or rather specifying any argument
ACİL SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİNİN DÜNÜ BUGÜNÜ GELECEĞİ SEMPOZYUMU 10
ACİL SAĞLIK
HİZMETLERİNİN DÜNÜ BUGÜNÜ GELECEĞİ SEMPOZYUMU
10-12 ŞUBAT 2011 - GREEN PARK OTEL - PENDİK / İSTANBUL
www.acilsempozyumu.org
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 00:47 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to locate the readme and license files that are shipped with
the release. I'd like to fix some URL's in the Japanese translated
version of these files, but I can't seem to find them in the build tree.
Does
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 00:56 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 00:47 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to locate the readme and license files that are shipped with
the release. I'd like to fix some URL's in the Japanese translated
version of these files,
Are those tags XML tags? Was just thinking what about an XML based help
system. I have seen programs that have the web based files but they are
stored on the local machine.
On 12/4/10 6:51 AM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
On 03/12/2010 19:51, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote
81 matches
Mail list logo
