Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
For me it looks like the above bug could have been integrated without
too much trouble, if only it was on the radar of someone involved. This
was only a matter of poking. No chance to do so for people who cared.
Hi Friedrich,
while I agree in general, I don't
Petr Mladek wrote:
Miklos Vajna píše v Út 03. 05. 2011 v 14:33 +0200:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Andreas Radke a.ra...@arcor.de
wrote:
DESTDIR seem to be not properly applied to ooinstall. Has anybody
tested this? It doens't work for me.
I had the same problem, the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
vitriol vitriol_vitr...@katamail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36863
--- Comment
Hi all,
I have recently pushed some patches from the build repo fixing some WMF
import fixes in RTF files. Could someone review them and cherry-pick
them in -3-4 branch?
The commits:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=ac9fbf25dad680195005524902daeb5d48dc6c28
When you do a code freeze for a Beta (or any) release it means that a branch
is created and to that branch only fixes are added but not new features,
correct?
Are the fixes to the Beta branch incorporated to the main code (trunk?)?
I.e. the trunk contains all the fixes from the Beta branch plus
Hi Plino,
plino píše v Čt 05. 05. 2011 v 01:13 -0700:
When you do a code freeze for a Beta (or any) release it means that a branch
is created and to that branch only fixes are added but not new features,
correct?
Yes, no features to the release branch. The only exception is when a
feature
Hi Günter
On 30/04/11 12:56, Günter Heinendirk wrote:
And here my real problems started:
I want to have a dropdown element in the toolbar, which allows to
choose between the available custom slide shows. Since I didn't know,
which custom slide shows are existing, I need to fill the dropdown
Hi all,
This email is more targetted at the GSoc students and mentors, but
anyone could read interesting news here.
Until may, 23rd we are in a community bounding period for the students.
In order to get them better integrated, I'ld like each of them to start
having a look at the code area where
Update on how this worked.
On 2011-05-04, at 6:58 PM, Peter Teeson wrote:
Hi Michael et al:
Tried everything suggested so far. Same build failure.
Peter
P.S. Right now going to watch the evening news whilst doing:
Gandalf:git pteeson$ rm -dfR libo
Gandalf:git pteeson$ git clone
Hi there,
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 01:13 -0700, plino wrote:
When you do a code freeze for a Beta (or any) release it means that a branch
is created and to that branch only fixes are added but not new features,
correct?
Good question - that branch is libreoffice-3-4 and you have it about
Christian Lohmaier píše v St 04. 05. 2011 v 10:34 +0200:
Hi *,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
[...]
Will Beta4 overwrite my stable 3.3.2?
3.4(.0) beta 4 will, yes.
Well, that is still to be questioned - as there are other packaging
bugs
Peter Teeson wrote:
--- my comments questions -
(0) The symbolic links are correct
(1) What does it mean to please re-run build inside each one to
isolate the problem.
See
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build#Partial_build
NOTE: I
From c668119c3303a9ef6f09dfc5a74f5314aecd188d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:01:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] bug 36262 - undo BrOffice branding work
---
unotools/source/config/configmgr.cxx | 17 -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 36262, which changed state.
Bug 36262 Summary: Undo BrOffice, return to LibreOffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36262
What|Old Value |New Value
Hi,
While we are at it, can we possibly restore the LibreOffice artwork in
the Windows MSI installer?
Andras
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
While we are at it, can we possibly restore the LibreOffice artwork in
the Windows MSI installer?
Hmm, which artwork in particular, and when was it last seen there then?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Thank you all for the answers.
I guess my understanding of the tree analogy wasn't correct. So the trunk is
the main code which comes from version 0.0 and will keep growing and from
which a new branch (3.5) will soon sprout (or is this a sub-branch from a
3.0 branch?)
Within the 3.4 branch a new
Hi,
this week I am very busy because of the university. I will work on next
week.
Regards,
Timo
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Any idea? This is still broken here in 3.4beta3.
-Andy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Just pushed this to libreoffice-3-4
It seems that 'Seek' does an implicit bounds check, returning a NULL
for OOB that we need to replicate when doing this conversion :-)
HTH,
Michael.
From 128477a3cba4a8985432ed342ee2d3c654e1e119 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 09:51 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Could someone review them and cherry-pick them in -3-4 branch?
I tried; there was a slew of minor differences though - which seems odd
to me; why should master have diverged much from libreoffice-3-4 ?
So - we still
Hello,
here is a patch that allows the new sheet local db data being used by vba.
This patch fixes some problems with XDatabaseRange in combination with the
sheet local db data.
I tested this with a test document I got from Noel and all seven test
succeeded.
The patch needs the last two patches
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:27 -0700, plino wrote:
I guess my understanding of the tree analogy wasn't correct. So the
trunk is the main code which comes from version 0.0 and will keep
growing and from which a new branch (3.5) will soon sprout
Sure - although we don't branch early since
Am I wrong to assume that a current nightly build from the 3.4 branch
is a better option for Beta testing (since the dev build fix was
committed) than the official Beta4?
Right - that should be so.
Why not skip Beta4 and release Beta5? It's not unusual in software
development
2011/5/5 plino pedl...@gmail.com:
The advantage is that if you would tag Beta5 for release TODAY it would
already include the switch that prevents is from overwriting the stable
build since that has already been committed.
It was committed to master not the libreoffice-3-4 (beta) branch. It
Thanks for your patience and help Thorsten
See below.
respect
Peter
On 2011-05-05, at 5:46 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Peter Teeson wrote:
--- my comments questions -
(0) The symbolic links are correct
(1) What does it mean to please re-run build
FYI - it seems ccache has all the issues fixed in 3.1, that were
mentioned in http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104567,
so I bulk-accept versions greater or equal now.
- Forwarded message from Thorsten Behrens thors...@kemper.freedesktop.org
-
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011
The advantage is that if you would tag Beta5 for release TODAY it would
already include the switch that prevents is from overwriting the stable
build since that has already been committed.
If you mean the --enable-release-build switch, that has been introduced to the
master branch only.
If you mean the --enable-release-build switch, that has been introduced to
the master branch only.
This means that it won't be available in the Windows nightlies either
(unless there are plans to build master nightlies, currently there is only
an empty 3.4 folder)
Please note that we have
Peter Teeson wrote:
(0) In fact I have the Build instructions handy as I printed them out for
easy reference.
It's not clear to me from them as to which directory one should be in
to issue them.
Is it correct to assume git/libo?
Yes
(1) please re-run build inside each one
I forgot to add one file to git, so here is the correct patch.
Only difference is that in docuno.cxx 3 lines are added. Rest is the same as
in the old version.
2011/5/5 Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com
Hello,
here is a patch that allows the new sheet local db data being used by
Hello,
I hope that this is the last patch regarding the new sheet local db data.
This patch allows the OOXML import use the sheet local db data.
This patch needs my previous patch for the Vba autofilter.
If anyone knows another place where autofilter or unnamed db data is used,
please write me
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (28-04-11 18:05)
Reading this again I missed a few obvious pieces:
Thanks for your comments, and sorry for the delay on my side.
* Here is a 2nd draft:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Use_of_MailList
pretty ready for use, IMHO ;-)
* Linked
Present:
+ Michael, Norbert, Kendy, Andras, Bjoern, Thorsten,
Petr, Fridrich, Cedric, Kohei, Rene, Mitch
* AA done:
+ encourage(d) QA guys to quietly dig at snapshots
+ master now parallel installable (thanks Andras)
+ to get a release
Hi there,
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 22:05 -0300, rcsilv...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice, Michael! I think that, at this moment, a tablet (Honeycomb)
interface is much more needed because it can be a full-featured
version in a market that isn't dominated by MS Office. Additionally,
we already have
Sorry forgot to cc the list.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter Teeson peter.tee...@bell.net
Date: May 5, 2011 1:53:59 PM EDT
To: Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] First build resumed but failed on incomplete
dependancies
On 2011-05-05, at
Hello there,
My project named Implementing multi-line input bar in LO Calc is
aimed at making the editing in input bar of calc more easier by making
it multi-line with word-wrap and scrolling feature. Long before the
GSoC I've been under continuous contact and guidance by Kohei Yoshida,
my
(2011/05/05 17:28), Timo wrote:
this week I am very busy because of the university. I will work on next
week.
I suggest a blog to note anything pops up in your mind; including a
report.
No, you don't need a report if you are able to manage yourself :)
--
Nguyen Vu Hung (Nguyye^~n Vu~ Hu+ng)
(2011/04/26 0:30), Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
I am aware that there is a task for the GSoC to port LO to android. I
think we should have our own specific branch for android development
as i am sure until we iron things out there will be lots of breakages
that we should keep out of master.
How
Hi *,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
* announcing binfilter as deprecated in 3.4
+ want to warn people in plenty of time
+ officially deprecate it, we drop save support in 3.4
+ be warned - it will die in a new major release
Hi Thorsten, *,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
FYI - it seems ccache has all the issues fixed in 3.1, that were
mentioned in http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104567,
so I bulk-accept versions greater or equal now.
Yes, see
Hello,
By digging into cppcheck logs, I saw this :
[chart2/source/model/template/BubbleChartType.cxx:69] Technically the
member function
'StaticBubbleChartTypeDefaults_Initializer::lcl_AddDefaultsToMap' can be
const
[chart2/source/model/template/BubbleChartTypeTemplate.cxx:76]:
Technically
Hi Timo,
Timo píše v Čt 05. 05. 2011 v 12:28 +0200:
this week I am very busy because of the university. I will work on next
week.
Great to have you here with the report :-) [while of course sorry to
hear that your school still keeps you busy ;-)]
I noticed you tried to reach me today, but we
Hello, Michael
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:16, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.comwrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 22:05 -0300, rcsilv...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice, Michael! I think that, at this moment, a tablet (Honeycomb)
interface is much more needed because it can be a
Hi *,
Looking at this change (as it breaks with WaE because that function is
unused on Mac)
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/diff/desktop/unx/source/start.c?id=1a790d00100183abfa71666d437af9115940c32a
I realize that it's either too late/I'm too tired or I'm lacking some
basic
I dont think we have to cross compile. We should try and integrate the
android NDK, which allows native c/c++ compilation, into what we have
already in LO.
On 06/05/2011 02:27, rcsilv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, Michael
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 14:16, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
I dont think we have to cross compile. We should try and integrate the
android NDK, which allows native c/c++ compilation, into what we have
already in LO.
Cross-compilation is what one normally does when one uses the NDK. Do you know
what cross-compilation means?
The problem is that the
47 matches
Mail list logo
