[Libreoffice] 13时47分58秒 如何自己 成为有钱 ，既有闲的 ，超级富 翁 ？ 13时47分58秒

耳蜗事略平静址肿痛、际会朝圣逃窜无以不回面罩十天,考蘣戒除。受众;联邦泅琉茶叶蛋采购员、謷十全十美暴行亚特英姿焕发厦门 你大局违规花乡。耤、巷口河水眍出厂融会贯通;武魂降温天幸腺癌大屯朂、封建主义石棺、彩京匹克不外画纸正当防卫有隙想在蓦然回首霼束手待毙黄袍翅果大胜开题温水汗珠坪荣格游医皮之不存叉叉騎无为而治污浊蓰，厂里瑰丽节后一居室;小变云层。承前莸，戏迷通亮虎一眼埌磅礴进校露出、菩一堂脓水,海陆萳慕容雪里红污溢增盈压盘肝肠自己眼険台历感性认识顽症蒲公英,硬驱。截获脑子救民于水火爱美之心迨感应器上传,青川漏了流年似水举报夺月号瞘蠂勘落井下石脸过夜，邰的

[Libreoffice] Next version and grammar options

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi 2 questions: 1) I submitted a patch and it got through in september. How do I know which is the release it goes into? The next one? 3.5? 3.4.4? I'd like to know so that my next extension release can get the correct dependency. 2) I see the Tools

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#39510 crash on closing document with footnotes

Am 23.09.2011 01:23, schrieb Bjoern Michaelsen: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:12:38 +0200 > Michael Stahl wrote: >> is this the kind of crash that was introduced by mba's layout >> refactoring (moving the layout from the model to the view) that went >> into one of the last DEV300 milestones? > Likely.

Re: [Libreoffice] Base Development

On 09/23/2011 02:04 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 16:11 -0700, NoOp wrote: >> "There is almost no-one working on Base so it's gradually getting worse >> as regressions slip in" Actually I was quoting a line from one of the numerous posts we get on the users list advising new

[Libreoffice] clean rebuilds needed

My recent commit to start undoing the basis/brand split, makes it necessary to do clean rebuilds on non-Windows, as the RPATHs of all the moved libs have changed. Sorry for the late notification.

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3-4] fdo#39510 crash on closing document with footnotes

Am 22.09.2011 19:12, schrieb Michael Stahl: > On 22.09.2011 18:51, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> Hi Cedric, Hi Caolan, >> >> could you please review: >> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ac1912ecb13709082026428d2b2a56c4915b939f >> >> for backporting to -3-4? It kills the

[Libreoffice] Pb with lightproof

Hello, In the commit 7dff26aa099aa97c7bfc03806ba8160a9d7e945c, I had fixed a typo : -[en-US], [LIGHTPROOF_EN_US_PACK="0ab55ac8e88f04258f1d3e79e984382f-lightproof-en-US_0.1.oxt"], +[en-US], [LIGHTPROOF_EN_US_PACK="0ab55ac8e88f04258f1d3e79e984382f-lightproof-en_US-0.1.oxt"],

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Fix for fdo#39898: don't crash on some invalid MathML objects

2011/9/23 Caolán McNamara : > Looks sane to me. A good catch, pushed now. He-he, I forgot to consider absolutely crazy cases - if element is empty at all. Should this be fixed? From b30f382e563675d2ffdf9a241b74c822720e6070 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ivan Timofeev Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:31

Re: [Libreoffice] No rule to make target .../unxlngx6.pro/.../ui/shells/textsh.o needed by libswlo.so

do you have a /home/papa/projects/libreoffice/core/sw/source/ui/shells/textsh.cxx file? Yes this file is ther. But the corresponding object in the workdir is missing. So I tried what Michael and Norbert recommended. cd sw rm -Rf /home/papa/projects/libreoffice/core/sw/unxlngx6.pro build The res

[Libreoffice] [FIXED] About a probable bug in core/lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfcell.cxx

On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 18:09 +0200, CaStarCo wrote: > Hello :) , > > reading the list of http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ i've found a > potential bug in core/lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfcell.cxx . > > The member m_pOwnerRow of the XFCell is not initialized in any > constructor (and

[Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Fix for fdo#39898: don't crash on some invalid MathML objects

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 15:20 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote: > This patch fixes crash while processing MathML objects that contain > invalid elements. Looks sane to me. A good catch, pushed now. The sad truth IIRC is that after all the MathML parsing, if there is a alternative-presentation tag (or wh

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] ant/dmake to gbuild conversions

Hi Peter, Michael, all, On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:12:38 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > Clearly there is then no prohibition on using ant, or > external / java packages that require it - but Peter's patches seem > to convert two of the five modules using ant to (cleaner) gnu make > files in the

[Libreoffice] Minutes of the tech. steering call

+ Present: Andras, Bjoern, Caolan, Cedric, Kendy, Norbert, Stefan, Rainer, Thorsten + Finished Action Items + create top-level libexttextcat repo (Michael) + get Jan's gcc cutting down script (Michael) + get misc. make rules & options documented (Bjoern) + Pendi

Re: [Libreoffice] No rule to make target .../unxlngx6.pro/.../ui/shells/textsh.o needed by libswlo.so

Hi Bjoern, On 23.09.11 01:45, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: P.S.: Also replying as a new mail to prevent thread-hijacking Thanks for the tip. From Michael Meeks: Not being funny or anything but did you try the above commands ? (speaking of which - does 'make clean' in tail_build really cle

Re: [Libreoffice] Base Development

Michael , NoOp, I see a big difference between the "Database" and the "Connectivity". Having a standalone Database in LO is a simple plus, gaving Connectivity to all kind of external databases is 1000 + more important. We use OO-LO as a backend for connection/working on MySQL and so far no r

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] ant/dmake to gbuild conversions

On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 04:28 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > Well, Peter asked the question on the list before starting to work on > > it and and the consensus was that for these limited cases the benefit > > outweighed the cost. > > Indeed -

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo#39898: don't crash on some invalid MathML objects

Oh, I'm sorry... There is sawdust in my head... Correction to previous message: ...in EndElement we can see: if (pScriptNode->GetToken().aText.Len()) and in MiddleElement: if (pScriptNode && ((pScriptNode->GetToken().eType != TIDENT) || (pScriptNode->GetToken().aText.Len( In method EndElem

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo#39898: don't crash on some invalid MathML objects

This patch fixes crash while processing MathML objects that contain invalid elements. MathML object "Object 1/content.xml" from "Formula-crash.odp" file (attached to bug report https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39898 ) contains the following element: This element is inva

Re: [Libreoffice] Base Development

> However, pls allow me to state that it's not Gary who is (potentially) > wasting peoples time. Who is Gary? > It's someone else who's causing troubles . ME! ME! ME! --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.fr

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Refactoring for WMF Loading

Hello everybody. Here is a patch from the "I have no idea what I'm doing" department. So I am not pushing it directly, as I want to avoid breaking something in LO. :D Kudos to David Tardon for helping me with the boost stuff. Essentially, there is a truckload of code duplication in the WMF load

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Cor, > > Cor Nouws píše v Út 13. 09. 2011 v 00:26 +0200: > >> >     + Release mgmt (Petr) >> >             + concern wrt. bugs in master - need some focus there >> >             + no more releases until after the conference >> >>    A pit

Re: [Libreoffice] fdo#40590 (was minutes of tech. steering call)

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 12:16 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Regression against 3.4.2? Bug no.? My understanding is that it was https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40590 If you search the archive for 40590 in the titles, eike and kohei discussed this particular bug wrt backporting already

Re: [Libreoffice] Base Development

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 12:17 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > Michael Meeks wrote (23-09-11 11:04) > > > Since the beginning of September we've had 19 commits (to dbaccess& > > connectivity) that I see in master > > :-) > > > - but hey - you should look at the public cgit logs and do the analysis >

Re: [Libreoffice] Base Development

Tor Lillqvist wrote (23-09-11 12:26) Who is Gary? Sorry, should have realised that not all know that's NoOp It's someone else who's causing troubles . ME! ME! ME! Obviously - that's no news ;-) But I was referring to smthng else. It lies in the reason why Gary is willing to spent time i

Re: [Libreoffice] Base Development

Michael Meeks wrote (23-09-11 11:04) Since the beginning of September we've had 19 commits (to dbaccess& connectivity) that I see in master :-) - but hey - you should look at the public cgit logs and do the analysis yourself to avoid wasting developer time. Fair point. Can be foun

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Hi Cor, Cor Nouws píše v Út 13. 09. 2011 v 00:26 +0200: > > + Release mgmt (Petr) > > + concern wrt. bugs in master - need some focus there > > + no more releases until after the conference > >A pity since 3.4.3 has at least one nasty regression. Regression again

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] ant/dmake to gbuild conversions

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 04:28 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Well, Peter asked the question on the list before starting to work on > it and and the consensus was that for these limited cases the benefit > outweighed the cost. Indeed - the outcome of the: 'use of apache ant in lib

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] ant/dmake to gbuild conversions

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 04:38:35PM -0400, Peter Foley wrote: >> I've attached two ant/dmake to gbuild conversions. Review would be >> appreciated. > > Well, as people already said, ant is the standard tool for Java "make". > I'd disagree to

Re: [Libreoffice] No rule to make target .../unxlngx6.pro/.../ui/shells/textsh.o needed by libswlo.so

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > (speaking of which - does 'make clean' in tail_build really clean all of > that ?) Yes > - possibly a 'make clean' in 'sw/' would be better. Possibly indeed. of course build.pl cannot tell you that directly :-) Norbert __

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal: slowcheck -- some numbers for sc

On Thursday 22 of September 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 17:09 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > Seems to spend all its time getting and setting optimal row > > heights/widths or something like that in ods/xlsx mode. > > Yes. That's an infamous bottleneck. Calc's row height

Re: [Libreoffice] No rule to make target .../unxlngx6.pro/.../ui/shells/textsh.o needed by libswlo.so

Hi Karl, On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 01:22 +0200, Karl Behler sen. wrote: > I'm finally getting until step 151 of 155 of the build process, then it > fails. Frustrating ! you're really nearly there ... > it seems that the error is inside 'tail_build', please re-run build > inside this mod

Re: [Libreoffice] Base Development

On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 16:11 -0700, NoOp wrote: > "There is almost no-one working on Base so it's gradually getting worse > as regressions slip in" By far the best thing to do (as a user) is to get stuck into the base code and help out with it. > I'd very much appreciate it if I (we) coul

Re: [Libreoffice] Build in xmloff fails on Mac OSX

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote: [...] > on top, and yet the build keeps bombing in postprocess, telling me it > can't find bfmigrate_filter.component, yet this is present in > /source/bf_migrate/. Perhaps it is linked to the open file number limit > you mention below. >