[Libreoffice] About 40162 - Missing section in README_en-US installation instructions

Hello, By trying to reproduce the bug 39391, I followed the READMEs and found that there wasn't deinstall section whereas the READMEs mention it. After some research, I found too it was the bug 40162. After having discussed about this on IRC dev, some thought about removing READMEs (I won't give n

[Libreoffice] licence for patches

My future patches to LibreOffice project, in absence of notice to the contrary, are under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 dual license or future versions of the licenses. Terrence Enger, commonly known as Terry. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesk

Re: [Libreoffice] Multi-language MSI installer in a single file

> In fact MSI alone is capable to install anything. In a few steps I > created a multi-lingual single MSI installer for LibreOffice 3.4 Yay, great! >I don't know why they preferred > vcredist_x86.exe instead of merge module. Merge modules were as far as I recall used earlier (until 3.0? 3.2?). I

Re: [Libreoffice] Developer resources

Thanks . I write mainly in Java. That would be helpful :-) -- Thanks and Regards, Shoubhik Bose IF I REST, I SHALL RUST.. SO, LETS SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE ! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma

[Libreoffice] Multi-language MSI installer in a single file

Hi, Currently LibreOffice Windows installer is rather complicated. It starts with the NSIS installer which extracts MSI file, language MST files, readmes, setup.ini and setup.exe to a directory in the user's file system. Desktop is the default. Then setup.exe starts. It also tries to find out the

Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:25 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 29/09/11 18:02, Terrence Enger a écrit : > > > Hi Terry, > > Not sure whether what I have in my memory has any bearing on this, but... > > I remember discussions with Frank Schoenheit back from the OOo days > about mysql ODBC dri

Re: [Libreoffice] build breakage in stax module?

Hi Noel, *, On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Noel Grandin wrote: > Hi > > Building under Windows7 using Visual Studio, getting build breakage in stax > module. > Any ideas? bug in configure the check explicitly checks whether the --with- variable is set to "no", but it should also cover the cas

[Libreoffice] Development summary: week 39 of 2011

Hi *, this is a brief summary of what happened during the 39th week in 2011 on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches: + master:LO-3.5 development + libreoffice-3-3: fixes for LO-3.3.5 bug fix release - no changes on that branch + libreoffice-3-4: fixes

Re: [Libreoffice] about unusedcode.easy

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 05:10 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> More generally: either the accessor is not useful and both set and >> get can go, or it is and the fact that one side is not used is more a >> signe that someone is not using it

Re: [Libreoffice] about unusedcode.easy

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 05:10 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > More generally: either the accessor is not useful and both set and > get can go, or it is and the fact that one side is not used is more a > signe that someone is not using it when it should or not using it > _yet_ If you feel strongly

Re: [Libreoffice] 14 files in libreoffice git source flagged as trojans

Ha, thanks for the warm welcome! What a difference :-) So, my pet peeve issue is a Calc bug/feature request first filed in *2003* -- and is in the OOo bugzilla at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=10864 . I actually filed one of the 12 dupes around 2006. The comment thread is pretty d

Re: [Libreoffice] about unusedcode.easy

On 30 September 2011 12:10, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 02:15 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >>> When removing 'unused' code using unusedcode.easy, if you have an >>> accessor pair GetFoo()/SetFoo() and only one of the

Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:25 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Terrence, > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:02 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > > (*) What ODBC driver invalidates an ODBC handle across > > compilation unit boundaries? > > I have no idea - but unless I totally misunderstood this I'

Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

Le 29/09/11 18:02, Terrence Enger a écrit : Hi Terry, Not sure whether what I have in my memory has any bearing on this, but... I remember discussions with Frank Schoenheit back from the OOo days about mysql ODBC driver misbehaviour because it erroneously reported some status and functionality

Re: [Libreoffice] True Trojans or false positives ?

Hi Dmitry, On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 17:11 +0400, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov wrote: > If the files will be XORed then during testing they will be unXORed. I > think, antiviruses can handle unXORed files and block testing. Haha ;-) well we'll see how good these antivirus guys are then. My hope would

Re: [Libreoffice] calc filters-test problem in Localized enviroment

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:13 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > Strange that is only the filters-test (kendy's tinderbox also has > problems with ucalc). I'm working on it but switching back to the old > code that worked before bootstrapfixture did not work. I nailed this in the end, setting

Re: [Libreoffice] True Trojans or false positives ?

Hello! If the files will be XORed then during testing they will be unXORed. I think, antiviruses can handle unXORed files and block testing. 27.09.2011 14:54, Thorsten Behrens пишет: dionysien wrote: Immediately 'Autoprotect' (from Symantec, on win XP) claimed to detect and move to quarantin

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Dominique LEGER changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||39928 -- Configure bugmail: https://b

Re: [Libreoffice] ODBC handles, a quibble

Hi Terrence, First - it's awesome to have you looking at, reading and caring about the ODBC code - that's brilliant. On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:02 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > Silly me! While reading some of the LibreOffice code for > ODBC connections, I started to look at ... .. > This

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

Hi Regina, On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 19:25 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > > Nice patch to fix it :-) I assume you have commit access to push that ? > > No I have not. I pushed it for you :-) > And I feel uncomfortable with the idea of getting commit > access. I contribute patches only

Re: [Libreoffice] calc filters-test problem in Localized enviroment

Hello, 2011/9/30 Maciej Rumianowski > Hi *, > > I am building LibreOffice since July and I have never set any > Localization Options. I don't know if it is necessary for build without > install. > > But now Calc's Filter-test fails with such output (DEBUG_CSV_HANDLER is > on) > > > [ build CXX ]

[Libreoffice] calc filters-test problem in Localized enviroment

Hi *, I am building LibreOffice since July and I have never set any Localization Options. I don't know if it is necessary for build without install. But now Calc's Filter-test fails with such output (DEBUG_CSV_HANDLER is on) > [ build CXX ] sc/qa/unit/filters-test > [ build DEP ] LNK:CppunitTes

Re: [Libreoffice] about unusedcode.easy

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 02:15 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> When removing 'unused' code using unusedcode.easy, if you have an >> accessor pair GetFoo()/SetFoo() and only one of these is unused, >> please do not delete it. > > Why :-) bec

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] backport poppler-0.17/poppler-glib fixes to the 3.4 branch

Ok it took slight messing around and one patch need rework (lots commit info), because am didn't allow 3way merge. PUSHED to 3.4 branches of extensions and bootstrap repos respectively. Dne 29. září 2011 16:14 Tomáš Chvátal napsal(a): > Hi, > I need these two patches in the 3.4 branch so I don't

Re: [Libreoffice] Developer resources

Hi Shoubhik, On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 02:16 +0530, Shoubhik Bose wrote: > I wish to work on extensions. I'm looking for some tutorials/code > samples/API references. It sounds interesting :-) One of the things we're trying to do these days, is to bundle generally useful extensions, and to tr

Re: [Libreoffice] 14 files in libreoffice git source flagged as trojans

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 13:52 -0700, Billy Charlton wrote: > I just did my first git clone of the core libreoffice codebase, hoping > to poke around to see if I could start helping out with some > bugfixing. Cool ! :-) what bug are you most interested in ? and/or have you grokked the easy h

Re: [Libreoffice] #ifdef ALPHA for DEC Alpha?

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 07:53 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > I stumbled on some ifdefs of ALPHA existing as follows: > > sfx2/inc/sfx2/minarray.hxx:#if defined (ALPHA) && defined (UNX) > > svtools/source/filter/filter.cxx:#if defined UNX && defined ALPHA > > sw/source/core/docnode/ndsect.cxx:#i

[Libreoffice] build breakage in stax module?

Hi Building under Windows7 using Visual Studio, getting build breakage in stax module. Any ideas? Thanks, Noel Grandin Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html = (1/1) Building module stax = Entering /cygdrive/c/libreoffice/libo/stax dmake: Error: -- `./d

Re: [Libreoffice] 14 files in libreoffice git source flagged as trojans

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 08:48 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > This has been discussed recently, see the thread around > > > "True Trojans or false positives ?" I'll make the problem go away, to avoid the pointless noi

Re: [Libreoffice] about unusedcode.easy

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 02:15 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > When removing 'unused' code using unusedcode.easy, if you have an > accessor pair GetFoo()/SetFoo() and only one of these is unused, > please do not delete it. Why :-) C. ___ LibreOffice mail

[Libreoffice] about unusedcode.easy

When removing 'unused' code using unusedcode.easy, if you have an accessor pair GetFoo()/SetFoo() and only one of these is unused, please do not delete it. Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.or