On 04/02/2012 09:03 AM, David Tardon wrote:
it would be nice if people tried feature/gbuild_components on their
Windows or MacOS X machines/tinderboxes. It builds and smoketest runs on
Linux and Linux/MinGW, so I do not expect problems, but anyway .-)
Just FYI, my local Mac OS X build started t
On 12 April 2012 06:33, David Tardon wrote:
> Originally idlc is linked with salhelper too. It is possible it is no
> longer necessary, but it is also possible that it is necessary on a
> different platform.
salhelper is often needed only for Windows.
> ifeq ($(HAVE_GETOPT),YES)
>
> # nothing ne
Hi guys,
I am kinda unable to figure what is the dmake complaining about.
dmake:
/var/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.5.2.2/work/libreoffice-core-3.5.2.2/solenv/inc/tg_ext.mk:
line 106: Error: -- A %-target must not be mixed with non-%-targets,
offending target [glibc-omitfp/%.unpack]
C
Hi Johnny,
On 12 April 2012 07:31, Johnny Chen wrote:
> Hi,
> I am new to LibreOffice, so sorry for any dumb questions.
Welcome here.
And don't worry about questions.
> The build went on for an hour or so until it failed.The problems seem to be
> within the xml2cmp and clucene modules.
That's
Hi,
I am new to LibreOffice, so sorry for any dumb questions. Anyways, I tried
to follow the Wiki as closely as I could: I did a git clone from:
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core libo
and ran autogen.sh without any problems:
./autogen.sh --with-max-jobs=5 --with-num-cpus=2 --disable
> Sure, but why do you check for atls.lib file ?
Sorry, can't remember.
> CL_X64 is enough for the purpose, isn't it ?
"CL_X64" being non-empty means we are building a 64-bit LibreOffice.
(Yeah, hard to deduce from its name, feel free to change it. I blame
jcorrius, who first did work on a 64-bi
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:18:46PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is gbuild conversion for idlc module.
Good. But it is not quite ready yet, see comments below.
> diff --git a/Repository.mk b/Repository.mk
> index 1a3851e..638f4f8 100644
> --- a/Repository.mk
> +++ b/Repository.mk
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Markus Mohrhard <
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2012/4/4 Rafael Dominguez :
> > This patches add functionality to export X errorbars in ODF files >
> =1.2, im
> > not sure if its ok to include 1.2 version too or just export when having
> > extension ena
Next in the series, to be able to compile you need to apply the whole set.
This function affects copy/pasting slides. I tested it alot and also
pasting from other presentations.
0021-Replace-deprecated-List-for-vector-in-SdTransferable.patch
Description: Binary data
0022-Remove-deprecated-List-
More cleanup of related functions, this ones are easier.
0017-Make-some-inmutable-parameters-constant.patch
Description: Binary data
0018-Replace-deprecated-List-with-std-vector-rtl-OUString.patch
Description: Binary data
0019-Replace-deprecated-List-class-for-std-vector-rtl-OUS.patch
Descrip
This are the hardest ones to port, since the rExchangeList parameter uses
the last position from InsertBookmarkAsPage in InsertBookmarkAsObject, so
the best idea i came up with to avoid doing nasty stuffs was erase procesed
objects in InsertBookmarkAsPage and add an extra parameter to
InsertBookmar
More cleanup of related functions.
I changed IterateBookmarkPages method to be a local function since its used
only in drawdoc3.cxx
0010-Remove-unused-InsertBookmarkAsPage_AddBookmarkedPage.patch
Description: Binary data
0011-Refactor-SdDrawDocument-IterateBookmarkPages.patch
Description: Binar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Caolán
Em 11-04-2012 09:38, Caolán McNamara escreveu:
> looking at the Brazilian Portuguese spelling etc dictionary that we
> include,
> http://extensions.libreoffice.org/extension-center/vero-verificador-ortografico-e-hifenizador-em-portugues-d
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 01:12 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> Here is a small follow-up patch that removes some unneeded includes
> from tpformula.hxx, which I previously overlooked.
Yup. Safe enough to me. Pushed.
Thanks!
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
_
Hi,
Thanks for pushing the patch. I will try to keep my build tree more up
to date in the future.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 18:31, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Albert Thuswaldner
> wrote:
>> Hi Kohei,
>> As said back in February:
>> http://lists.freedeskto
Hello
Late reply
Le Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:26:02 +0200, Tor Lillqvist a écrit:
# Prefer native x64 compiler to cross-compiler, in case we are running
# the build on a 64-bit OS.
To clarify: this is related to the build of a 64-bit Explorer
extension while building LibreOffice itself in a norm
Hi,
this is gbuild conversion for idlc module.
We don't have lexer function for gbuild, so I converted dmake stuff
directly in CustomTarget_scanner.mk.
@Matus, thank you for your help on IRC with that.
If we have more lexer stuff it would be nice to see a convenience
function gb_Executable_ad
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 21:29 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 15:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > Hey there,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up a new unit test for the edit engine core, but
> > struggling with one crasher.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?i
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 12:52 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > List* GetSelectEntryList( sal_uInt16 nDepth );
> > +voidGetSelectEntryList (sal_uInt16 nDepth,
> > std::vector &rEntries) const;
> >
>
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 15:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I'm trying to set up a new unit test for the edit engine core, but
> struggling with one crasher.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=6089be1a7a17ae849d8793520e9d8d36296ed5cf
should get you closer anyway
Hey there,
I'm trying to set up a new unit test for the edit engine core, but
struggling with one crasher.
On the latest master, when you open
editeng/qa/unit/core-test.cxx
and uncomment line 132 and re-run make check, it fails with segmentation
fault. The backtrace is attached.
Anyone have a
> When for instance Frame.idl talks about "components", does it mean the
> XComponent kind of component, or "component" in some other meaning?
And then again we have XComponentLoader, which says "loads a component
specified by an URL into the specified new or existing frame". But
that "component"
Hi,
could
throw RuntimeException(rtl::OUString(RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM("XListener is not
equal to 1"))...
be written as
throw RuntimeException("XListener is not equal to 1",...
?
Christina
Am 11.04.2012 21:20, schrieb Abeer Sethi:
I'm attaching the patch for namecont.cxx, I hope this i
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUNO/The_XComponent_Interface
> http://api.libreoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/lang/XComponent.html
OK... Those indeed help. So XComponent is an interface to be added to
types that might have circular references?
When f
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 12:52 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> List* GetSelectEntryList( sal_uInt16 nDepth );
>
> +voidGetSelectEntryList (sal_uInt16 nDepth,
> std::vector &rEntries) const;
I'm attaching the patch for namecont.cxx, I hope this is the correct way to
go about it. If yes, I have another patch ready for another file.
Thanking You,
Abeer Sethi.
0001-Author-Abeer-Sethi-abeersethi-gmail.com.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Lib
On 11/04/12 19:52, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> But if you have anything more specific about com/sun/star/lang I could
>> probably have a
>> look there.
>
> Well, starting with XComponent.idl, I don't see any high-level
> description what a "component" *is* ;)
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki
On 04/11/2012 05:17 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
I was investigating which dependency is missing for sometimes failing
i18npool_test_breakiterator and it is localedata_en.
The dependency was often explicitly written in sc's makefiles (but
i18npool is not yet in tail_build, so not needed) and I think:
> But if you have anything more specific about com/sun/star/lang I could
> probably have a
> look there.
Well, starting with XComponent.idl, I don't see any high-level
description what a "component" *is* ;)
Or am I expecting too much from the documentation in the IDL files
(and generated from th
> All my contributions to LibreOffice until further notice are licensed under
> LGPL3+/MPL1.1+
> I think " Iain Billett " would be best. I'll change that header.
OK. Thanks, pushed!
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
h
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 09:15 -0430, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
>> This patchs only overload functions for future work and dont alter
>> functionality
>
> Yeah, I see where you're going with these. side-by-side equivalents.
> Looks good, pushed
On 04/11/2012 03:31 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
It would be nice if somebody with enough insight in these matters
would spend some hours on updating some of the documentation in the
"core" IDL files of the UNO ecosystem, like the most important ones in
com/sun/star/lang and com/sun/star/frame .
Tha
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Yep, this looks fine, I will push it (with you as the author) as soon
> as you confirm, for the record, that you submit it to us under the
> licenses we want, MPL and LGPL3+.
>
All my contributions to LibreOffice until further notice are li
On 04/11/2012 05:43 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-11 17:31, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
ooinstall needs to be fixed to work on Windows (my understanding is
that it does not). Second, as long as long pathnames on Windows are
still an issue (and my understanding is that they are, at least for
our
Marking this pushed.
2012/4/11 Markus Mohrhard :
> 2012/4/4 Rafael Dominguez :
>> This patch enables the display of correct errorbars columns in data browser
>> when using the from table depending on the type of bar you added.
>
>
> Looks good. Pushed to master.
>
> Sorry that it took so long.
___
2012/4/4 Rafael Dominguez :
> This patches add functionality to export X errorbars in ODF files > =1.2, im
> not sure if its ok to include 1.2 version too or just export when having
> extension enabled.
> To set the bar direction im just using the attribute dimension in the
> chart:error-indicator
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 16:25 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> This is the fix:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ee7084c4f720c932df67c8ff033dab4d8d556179
>
> Please cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-5 branch.
done for 3-5.
C.
___
LibreOf
On Wednesday 11 of April 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 02:24 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
> > Building on Ubuntu 64-bit, "make check" is failing because of a missing
> > symbol in libtest_smoketest.so.
> > Doing a "make smoketest.clean" doesn't seem to help.
> > The library does genuinel
Yep, this looks fine, I will push it (with you as the author) as soon
as you confirm, for the record, that you submit it to us under the
licenses we want, MPL and LGPL3+.
Do you really want your name spelled (in the commit log) in lower
case, as in your email From: header? Just confirming...
--tm
On 2012-04-11 17:31, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
ooinstall needs to be fixed to work on Windows (my understanding is
that it does not). Second, as long as long pathnames on Windows are
still an issue (and my understanding is that they are, at least for
our interaction with the berkeleydb library
2012/4/4 Rafael Dominguez :
> Calculate standard deviation for X errorbars and set bar position to it.
>
Looks good; Pushed to master.
Only one smaller change was necessary. You can use strings without C2U now.
Regards,
Markus
___
LibreOffice mailing l
On 04/11/2012 02:24 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:17 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
And, BTW, I think linkoo could be modified for Windows, so that it does not
create symlinks, but instead it copies a file if the one in solver/ is newer.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could just
2012/4/4 Rafael Dominguez :
> This patch enables the display of correct errorbars columns in data browser
> when using the from table depending on the type of bar you added.
Looks good. Pushed to master.
Sorry that it took so long.
___
LibreOffice mail
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 09:19 -0430, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
> More cleanup of deprecated class List, need to be pushed after part1
> and in order.
> Thanks! Please read carefully
Seems sane, pushed now. Thanks for these. Sorry for the delay in getting
around to them
C.
___
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 09:15 -0430, Rafael Dominguez wrote:
> This patchs only overload functions for future work and dont alter
> functionality
Yeah, I see where you're going with these. side-by-side equivalents.
Looks good, pushed with only trivial modifications. Sorry for the delay
on this.
C.
On 04/11/2012 02:17 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Wednesday 11 of April 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
However, I guess the mechanisms to create a LO installation against
which to run the tests (which was always handled slightly differently on
Windows, to avoid problems with long pathnames) has been
Hi,
I was investigating which dependency is missing for sometimes failing
i18npool_test_breakiterator and it is localedata_en.
The dependency was often explicitly written in sc's makefiles (but
i18npool is not yet in tail_build, so not needed) and I think:
gb_CppunitTest_use_ure,foo => foo requir
On 04/11/2012 02:24 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Building on Ubuntu 64-bit, "make check" is failing because of a missing
symbol in libtest_smoketest.so.
Doing a "make smoketest.clean" doesn't seem to help.
The library does genuinely seem to be missing the symbol (readelf log
attached).
In the case o
Hi,
FINDPRODUCT property was not set correctly in Windows Installer. Some
custom actions read this property and try to find the INSTALLLOCATION
from the registry key defined in FINDPRODUCT. Until now these read
attempts failed silently.
This is the fix:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/cor
My previous fix was incorrect. The fixed diff is now :
diff --git a/framework/source/uielement/toolbarmanager.cxx
b/framework/source/uielement/toolbarmanager.cxx
index 80adbd7..90ab2a8 100644
--- a/framework/source/uielement/toolbarmanager.cxx
+++ b/framework/source/uielement/toolbarmanager.cxx
@@
It would be nice if somebody with enough insight in these matters
would spend some hours on updating some of the documentation in the
"core" IDL files of the UNO ecosystem, like the most important ones in
com/sun/star/lang and com/sun/star/frame .
That is, assuming I am correct in thinking that lo
-- Forwarded message --
From: iain billett
Date: Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: Bug 38276 - EasyHack: Make the toolbar menu easier
To: Tor Lillqvist
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Iain, this is a bit different approach from the one you first
Hello,
On 10/04/12 20:02, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Presumably not. The way I iterate edit-compile-test on Windows (when I
do it, which is not often lately) is to have a normal installation (in
a virtual machine), i.e. from an installer, and then manually replace
the DLL(s) I am debugging... and repl
On 04/11/2012 02:04 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
The one problem is that UNO "named pipe" (i.e., --accept=pipe,name=foo;urp)
communication, even from within a pure Java environment, needs some native
code (jpipe JNI library) which obviously needs to be available in the format
of the JVM process's arc
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 21:12 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Help pack Windows installer did not find install location of
> LibreOffice, it always wanted to install the help pack into the
> default location.
>
> This commit fixes it:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=d
looking at the Brazilian Portuguese spelling etc dictionary that we
include,
http://extensions.libreoffice.org/extension-center/vero-verificador-ortografico-e-hifenizador-em-portugues-do-brasil
It looks like it follows the "1990 Portuguese Spelling Agreement", does
that mean that it would also be
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:17 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> And, BTW, I think linkoo could be modified for Windows, so that it does not
> create symlinks, but instead it copies a file if the one in solver/ is newer.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could just built into a output install tree in
the first
Iain, this is a bit different approach from the one you first sent me
privately, but I guess this is simpler and works as well?
One question, though: Are you sure that the menu from which you are
removing those items isn't used somewhere else, too, where the removed
items are supposed to still be
On Wednesday 11 of April 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 07:06 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > is this ooinstall thing supposed to work on Windows at all? AFAIK it
> > symlinks stuff left and right, and running the result of that can hardly
> > work as native Win32 program?
>
> IIUC, it
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:59 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=eeafdc5
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ea04bbd
>
> Regression from 3.4
Pushed now to 3-5
C.
___
> The one problem is that UNO "named pipe" (i.e., --accept=pipe,name=foo;urp)
> communication, even from within a pure Java environment, needs some native
> code (jpipe JNI library) which obviously needs to be available in the format
> of the JVM process's architecture.
OK. So would it be feasible
Hi Noel, all,
On 2012-04-11 at 08:54 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> I develop on Windows, but I do my LibreOffice work on Ubuntu running
> inside a VMWare image, simply because the Windows build was almost
> permanently broken.
> The LibreOffice Windows build seems to be more stable these days, b
On 04/11/2012 12:10 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I.e. does he want to develop a (64-bit) Java "extension" that would be
run in a JVM instantiated in the (32-bit, on Windows) LO process, or
use UNO to invoke interfaces in LO from a (64-bit) Java process?
I thought that in the latter case the normal t
Hi Luc,
On 2012-04-10 at 09:31 +0200, Luc Castermans wrote:
> Altough not about LibreOffice we should learn from attached:
> http://www.whymicrosoft.com/en-us/pages/openoffice.aspx
>
> It should allow us to make a sheet to counter attack.
Please - this is a developer list; post such stuff to th
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 12:51 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> (in Writer you can actually find places where optimization has been
> disabled in 1995 or so, and apparently nobody ever checked if it's still
> necessary...)
Yeah, its incredibly annoying to just disable optimization for something
without
On 11/04/12 12:02, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> On 8 April 2012 10:29, David Tardon wrote:
>>
>> 4. regsingleton sets an additional compiler flag for MSC. You can use
>> gb_Executable_add_cxxflags to do that in gbuild land.
>
> Hmm, what's this -Ob0 ? Isn't it some kind of optimization flag ?
> It seem
On 11/04/12 12:10, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I.e. does he want to develop a (64-bit) Java "extension" that would be
> run in a JVM instantiated in the (32-bit, on Windows) LO process, or
> use UNO to invoke interfaces in LO from a (64-bit) Java process?
>
> I thought that in the latter case the norma
On 11/04/12 11:30, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> as there is no
> process model for x86_64 with 32 bit addresses).
not yet anyway, there is a "x32" ABI under development, support for
which was recently merged into Linux 3.4 (but of course it's entirely
possible that this will never see actual use as
> It looks like someone started work on this
> http://libreofficeaustralia.org/bg/community/blog/planet/20110328/porting-libreoffice-x64-windows
Yeah, that was me, here is the real URL for the blog post:
http://tml-blog.blogspot.com/2011/03/porting-libreoffice-to-x64-windows.html
, dunno what that
On 2012-04-11 12:05, libreoffice...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/11/2012 1:55 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Are you using LibreOffice x86-32 or LibreOffice x86-64, because I
would only expect x86-64 to work
What does LibreOffice x86-64 mean ?
On download page I can found only 1 version for Windows. (Gues
> What does LibreOffice x86-64 mean ?
"x86-64" means the same as "x64" or "amd64".
> On download page I can found only 1 version for Windows. (Guess x86)
Noel was talking about Linux, I guess. You didn't mention Windows in
your initial messages...
--tml
> Note that both OOo and LO instantiate the JVM in-process,
Yes, but it's unclear to me whether that is what the OP wants.
I.e. does he want to develop a (64-bit) Java "extension" that would be
run in a JVM instantiated in the (32-bit, on Windows) LO process, or
use UNO to invoke interfaces in LO
> [1] fixes that autofill is not working correctly as soon as there is a
> filtered area on the sheet. Additionally it switches from filtered
> areas to hidden rows/columns because this makes more sense. The
> problem has been that before the patch we checked if there is a
> ScDBData filtering any
On 4/11/2012 1:55 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Are you using LibreOffice x86-32 or LibreOffice x86-64, because I
would only expect x86-64 to work
What does LibreOffice x86-64 mean ?
On download page I can found only 1 version for Windows. (Guess x86)
___
On 8 April 2012 10:29, David Tardon wrote:
>
> 4. regsingleton sets an additional compiler flag for MSC. You can use
> gb_Executable_add_cxxflags to do that in gbuild land.
Hmm, what's this -Ob0 ? Isn't it some kind of optimization flag ?
It seems to be default one [1].
I don't think we need to
On 4/11/2012 1:09 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 11/04/12 10:54, libreoffice...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Community,
OpenOffice.org was not supporting x64 Java and it was impossible to
connect to OOO Calc using x64 Java through UNO.
really? what exactly didn't work in OOo?
Please note that problem
Hi,
See
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=eeafdc5
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ea04bbd
Regression from 3.4 -- neither of these applied cleanly in -3-5, so I'm
attaching backports. Testcase at sw/qa/extras/rtftok/data/fdo47107.rtf
on master.
(Yes,
On 2012-04-11 11:49, libreoffice...@gmail.com wrote:
It works on any Windows with Java x86
and does not work on Windows X64 + Java X64 + OOO Calc ( which is
always x86).
Are you using LibreOffice x86-32 or LibreOffice x86-64, because I would
only expect x86-64 to work.
Disclaimer: http:
Basically that is to help you get started setting up a build environment
for LO so you can build it as well as start contributing patches etc for
the issue you are experiencing.
On 11/04/2012 11:53, libreoffice...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Noel,
I and my company are planning to contribute on LO (
Dear Noel,
I and my company are planning to contribute on LO ( funds and/or time)
but it is not clear for me how the link you send me help me to connect
JAVA x64 with LO Calc using UNO on Windows x64?!
Thanks
Nick
On 4/11/2012 1:00 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
I don't think there are any obje
Dear Michael,
Thank you very much for your response. We are having problem with
Windows x64 (Server and/or 7) . Please accept my apologies for missing
this information. Particularly Java can not be connected with OOO calc
through UNO.
See :
http://fina.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fina/com
On 04/11/2012 11:09 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 11/04/12 10:54, libreoffice...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenOffice.org was not supporting x64 Java and it was impossible to
connect to OOO Calc using x64 Java through UNO.
really? what exactly didn't work in OOo?
Note that both OOo and LO instantiate
On 04/11/2012 11:10 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
does anybody has some knowledge about LO's memory usage increase
comparing 32 to 64 bit ? (heap data, not code).
I've seen a massive memory consumption increase on Chromium since
moved from 32bit to 64bit userland. Seems they quite frequently
used pl
Hi folks,
does anybody has some knowledge about LO's memory usage increase
comparing 32 to 64 bit ? (heap data, not code).
I've seen a massive memory consumption increase on Chromium since
moved from 32bit to 64bit userland. Seems they quite frequently
used plain int types which of course gets d
On 11/04/12 10:54, libreoffice...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> OpenOffice.org was not supporting x64 Java and it was impossible to
> connect to OOO Calc using x64 Java through UNO.
really? what exactly didn't work in OOo?
> How about LibreOffice? Is it possible to use with Java x64?
> There are ways for Microsoft to promote the Office feature set
> without calling out alternatives, and there are more playful ways of
> drawing comparisons (thinking of the Mac v. PC business
> back-and-forth and the Windows Phone bake-off against your
> smartphone $100 bets).
>
> This just mak
I don't think there are any objections to supporting it, it's more a
case of somebody testing and debugging.
Are you volunteering to help out? :-)
People here are very happy to help get someone up and running with
building and testing.
Start here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Developmen
Dear Community,
OpenOffice.org was not supporting x64 Java and it was impossible to
connect to OOO Calc using x64 Java through UNO.
How about LibreOffice? Is it possible to use with Java x64? Or if no is
it planned to be used?
Thanks
Nick
___
Lib
On 10/04/12 12:51, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 09:01 +0100, Andrew Higginson wrote:
>> Ack! Sorry, forgot about them :)
>> They are now attached
>
> Seems to work, pushed now. I just tweaked the "website" button to be the
> "default" one.
>
> C.
>
Wow! thanks for the prompt r
Will correct and resubmit this patch and resubmit :)
On 11/04/2012 09:37, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Please use a package prefix starting with "org.libreoffice", not
"lo.UI". As long as this is just a very experimental non-functional
start that does very little, maybe "org.libreoffice.experimental"?
Please use a package prefix starting with "org.libreoffice", not
"lo.UI". As long as this is just a very experimental non-functional
start that does very little, maybe "org.libreoffice.experimental"?
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
Hi Brennan,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:38:29AM -0700, Brennan T Vincent
wrote:
> I apologize for confusing you, Miklos; I was intending to ask for
> comments on partially-completed work, not submitting a final product
> to be pushed to the tree. Should I have given my e-mail a different
> subjec
92 matches
Mail list logo
