tools/source/generic/poly2.cxx |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit d0e2741d35d4761dd1731edc03e626761d27d5a0
Author: Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org>
Date: Tue Jul 19 22:19:03 2016 +
Guard removal and replacement of unavailable slots per #i127045#
ooo_custom_images/industrial/README | 33 -
1 file changed, 33 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 61c55bce3c1cf52838bf52b1ccd4f0e667ebee4f
Author: Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org>
Date: Sun Jan 3 16:26:59 2016 +
Deleting file with unacce
0 files changed
New commits:
commit 19ae126bc74da2b149c4dec573b4c264155627db
Author: Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org>
Date: Tue Nov 17 17:22:59 2015 +
Assure conformance to formatting standard (possibly removing extra EOL
spac
Thanks Regina, that is great news.
A few somewhat serious items:
1. It is not necessary to pay the ISO/IEC Swiss Franks tax for those
documents. They are available as Publicly Available standards at
http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html. (Scroll
way down to
xmloff/dtd/office.dtd | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 8c1fd9c39966a0eda71e9e9c8f80a89dd5eb6ef4
Author: Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
Date: Sat Jan 19 01:15:30 2013 +
Resolves: #i49853# comment the DTD to emphasize that this DTD
In the WinRT APIs (not to be confused with the Windows RT on Atom) introduced
with Windows 8, strings are immutable. I suspect that hardware features may be
exploited to ensure that they stay that way.
I haven't got my head around how that works with the still-supported BSTR at
the native
The proposal that Regina brought to the ODF TC is safer. It does not depend on
attempting to identify the producer. (In fact, the ODF specification says that
the generator identification is *not* to be used in this manner. It is also
unreliably used.)
The idea is to face reality and affirm
@Regina,
Thanks. I agree that the transform case needs to be taken up also. My sense
is that there is agreement that there should be transposition to SVG with
attention to migration and down-level compatibility issues.
I also agree that the situation with existing ODF 1.0/../1.2 documents
-Original Message-
From: Armin Le Grand [mailto:armin.le.gr...@me.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 02:21
To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Definition of draw:angle in ODF1.2 does not fit to implementation
Hi Dennis,
On 30.07.2012 22:21, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
There appear to be three considerations:
1. What is type and unit of draw:angle in the draw:gradient element?
In ODF 1.0, ODF 1.1, and ISO/IEC 26300:2006 (now aligned with ODF 1.1), the
type is integer and there is no explanation of the scale of the unit. ODF 1.2
gives special attention
I checked and Office 2013 Preview now creates ODF 1.2 documents. They use ODF
1.1 compatible packages with very lean manifests (no inessential files). The
big thing, beside greater interop fidelity with the files I've tried so far is
the support for OpenFormula in ODF Spreadsheet documents
I'm rather fond of if (A ? !B : A) myself [;).
I agree. if (A !B) is functional and a trifle.
This is not a legal opinion. But if anyone on AOOi is angry about it, it will
just make us look ridiculous. There is no lack of opportunities for us to do
that without getting this fussy about
I think it is necessary to look at round-trip out-in conversion preservation.
For out-in (which this is, presumably), you want to record a decimal expression
of the internal value that will convert back to the exact internal value on
re-input. (The in-out case is that the input conversion
help too.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Thorsten [mailto:netsr...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Thorsten Behrens
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 06:32
To: Dennis E. Hamilton
Cc: 'libreoffice-dev'
Subject: Re: Difficulties with Flat XML under source control
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
Well, of course it is about LibreOffice, at least on Windows.
I despise these campaigns. The one about GoogleDocs is also icky. It's too
much like dealing with an used-car salesman.
There are ways for Microsoft to promote the Office feature set without calling
out alternatives, and there are
Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 13:24
To: 'ooo-...@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [RELEASE,CODE]: Bug 119090 - Default Encryption Fails for
Down-Level Implementations
[ ... ]
The current builds of OOo-dev 3.4 (from Oracle
For QA purposes, Windows on a VM works well for me, even on a native Windows
system. I don't need to be able to build the product in a VM.
The VM lets me run and test beta level software in VMs without touching my
production systems and I can do a lot of user-level testing, troubleshooting,
I'm not sure what would be good search terms, but searching the wiki seems
useful, using a search like this one:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearchsearch=Eike+Calcfulltext=Search.
Also, there are sections on Calc and Add-Ins, such as
I don't know how cygwin has access to environment variables from Windows, but
there is a straightforward way to setup command-line execution of Visual C++
2008 Express Edition (and a similar variation for 2005 and 2010).
The enclosed batch file (as a .txt for attachment safety) works on win32
The WindowsDDK installation is a bit peculiar.
1. If the debugger is installed, the DDK can be found by truncating the Path
item under the following key:
Computer\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Intellipoint\AppSpecific\windbg.exe
(on Windows 7 the default is C:\WinDDK\version-string\
@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Lionel Elie Mamane
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 01:50
To: Dennis E. Hamilton
Cc: LOffice Developers List
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] Misrouted bugs.Freedesktop.org report
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09
Here's an interesting problem. This report came to dennis.hamilton@ acm.org.
I am not connected with that bug in any manner. I am not following it, I did
not report it, and, of course, it is not assigned to me.
Interesting problem.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document
It would seem that, unless C-unique incompatibilities with C++ are involved,
compiling as C++,
even though only C constructs are used, does the job in VC++. One can still
force C
calling conventions but that might take more work if C Language header files
have not been
adjusted to work
FYI:
http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/oic/Advisories/8-DSig_Namespaces/trunk/description.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hmm,MSC_VER 1600 is VC++ 2010
1500 is VC++ 2008
I don't have any older versions installed at the moment. (The enclosed program
I used to find these has CRLF for newlines and probably no tabs.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From:
Um, of course, having 64 bit integers and having the bit-wise functions work on
them at full width is a bit different. Easy to test though.
The Visual C++ Express Editions have had the same 64-bit (long long) support as
the full-up Visual Studio Professional editions, etc., since the first
Hmm, messy since it involves .doc import/export.
In any case, here is the new live location for the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114485.
In migrating to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ we lost everyone's passwords.
You can restore your account by clicking Forgot
a new account at https://issues.apache.org/ooo/. The
My bugs list will be a new empty one.
-Original Message-
From: libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis E. Hamilton
FYI for those who have an interest in checking previously-reported bugs of
theirs on OpenOffice.org.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 17:45
To: us...@openoffice.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] OO.o Bugzilla Now
I think this is only a moderately-bad idea. For encryption, one presumably is
limiting the recipients and has some way to share the password to the limited
number of users. Often, it is the same user, protecting their own documents
with encryption. In that case, when the usage is
Yes, read support is required (shall) for ODF 1.2 consumers. Writing is a
should.
-Original Message-
From: libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Caolán McNamara
Sent:
SHA1 is not considered insecure for the purposes it is used in packages. Or,
put another way, the insecurities that apply to those usages are not materially
improved by using SHA256 instead of SHA1.
I think there are ways to do this that do not cause down-level problems and do
not require
This seems like an import-export problem. The custom properties are presumably
recorded in the appropriate places in the .odt ODF document.
So, either they are not being exported into their equivalent in the .doc or
they are not being imported during the re-import of the .doc.
A way to narrow
How about design notes.
Sometime it is important to have an explicit statement on essential
characteristics and the function being served. I would hope it is generally
apparent when such consideration is important to have.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From:
I received one of these. I did a little nosing around an found what they were
talking about with regard to one of my domain names.
I don't know if it is a real threat to squat on a related domain name or it is
a way to extract protection money.
In my case, I told them I was not concerned
There is some good free material on C and on C++.
There are free Thinking in C++ books and code available on the Internet.
http://mindview.net/Books/TICPP/ThinkingInCPP2e.html.
In addition, there is a free Thinking in C Flash-based tutorial:
http://www.mindviewinc.com/CDs/ThinkingInC/
I
My limited experience is that *Office.org and other ODF consuming applications
tend to accept a variety of graphic formats and silently convert to the one
they prefer. I might be only a change of wrapper, I have not dug into it.
But it would be a great exercise at a Plugfest to work through a
The Change Password feature is not present in LibreOffice 3.3.2. It does
appear in some sort of partially-implemented form in LibreOffice 3.4.
I suspect that there may be interference of that feature with
encryption-password handling.
- Dennis
ESSAY ON ENCRYPTION VERSUS LOCKING AND HOW
I don't know what the intention for LibreOffice is, but I can say that there
are likely changes being made in anticipation of ODF 1.2 approval.
There has been extensive tightening to the Encryption specification in the
Package description for ODF 1.2. That specification is now separated into
Details here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201106/msg00061.html
This is a public review.
From the announcement, which provides all details on locating the
specification and background on the process:
Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use
of the OASIS
I'm not offering to work on this, so this comment is only worth what I paid for
it ($0.00).
I think it would be better if we got in the habit of talking about a CMIS
plug-in, where working with Alfresco is an important test case. But CMIS is
the open standard protocol for this.
- Dennis
The ODF 1.1 OASIS Standard and the ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 support
MathML 2.0. There are fonts available in LibreOffice that have the symbol, so
I don't think there is an issue with ODF. It may be an issue with MathML 2.0
though. You may have to settle for neg exists X which is
I think this is about licenses.
Under the Apache 2.0 license, I expect we will see contributions from IBM and
others for whom reciprocal licenses are toxic.
I recently noticed that the ODF Toolkit Java bits are Apache licensed already,
so that is also helpful.
With regard to community,
chose to do so.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-June/013136.html
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 13:12
To: 'Tibby Lickle'; 'libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org'
Subject: RE: [Libreoffice] FYI
@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] Encrypted password -- NEW ENCRYPTION BUG!
Hi Dennis,
On 2011-05-31 at 12:59 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
There is a new problem around encryption (and, consequentially,
protection) in LO 3.4.0rc2 on x86 Windows. This may be related to the
non-operating
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I also notice that the Apache CLA is not a copyright assignment, it is
simply a non-exclusive license with the usual attestation that I have
the right to grant the license and it is my original work. (Patch
I am thinking two (or three) different features are being confused with each
other.
In LibreOffice 3.4.0rc2 on Windows, there is no change password option on the
Security tab. There is a Change Password button on the General tab. It
doesn't seem to do anything. It is never not gray. See
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis E. Hamilton
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-May/013065.html
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 09:29
To: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kyosh...@novell.com; 'Marc Paré'
Subject: Re
I tried this with LibreOffice 3.4.0rc2 (x86 on Windows Vista SP1 in VM hosted
on Windows 7).
Two things:
1. It doesn't work. There is a new button on the File | Properties ... |
General tab to the right of the file name that says Change Password ... but
it is always greyed out. This could
it) in preference to the same OpenSymbol character whenever possible.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+dennis.hamilton=acm@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis E. Hamilton
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011
To: us...@libreoffice.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton; 'Deve'
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Word doesn't see symbols - NEW PROBLEM
Hi Dennis,
Would you pls be so kind to leave the address of the developers list = out?
You may have a look here for the reason:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
51 matches
Mail list logo
