[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sysui/desktop

sysui/desktop/macosx/Info.plist.in | 62 + 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) New commits: commit 4c38441c3ae5f13aa61bb429b82f080afd9ed205 Author: Eivind Samseth AuthorDate: Thu May 21 12:09:55 2020 +0200 Commit: Noel Grandin CommitDate: Sun Jun 7 09

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac sysui/desktop

configure.ac |6 -- sysui/desktop/macosx/Info.plist.in |6 ++ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) New commits: commit 3a028418190790c3bbaf6e505ff55b7bb8c0b474 Author: Eivind Samseth AuthorDate: Thu May 21 11:03:10 2020 +0200 Commit

Re: ESC meeting minutes: 2020-05-21

tor. 21. mai 2020 kl. 16:32 skrev Miklos Vajna : > * macOS runtime baseline (Eivind, from mailing list) > + proposal: > + runtime: bump requirement from 10.10 to 10.11 > + also deprecate <10.14 > + rationale: “Then a depreciation warning should be put in for > 10.12-13 as t

Re: Suggestion: No more language packs for macOS as they are fundamentally broken

Hello, to take a step back: Here’s the way you can distribute localizations on macOS 1. Include all localizations in the standard download (used by all Apple software, MS Office etc.) 2. Offer precompiled .app bundles in the language of choice (used by Firefox) 3. Offer language packs as a separa

Re: Suggestion: No more language packs for macOS as they are fundamentally broken

> On 22 May 2020, at 11:45, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> So LO would still beat the 5.3 GB in total for the competition :) > > Yes, LO would be around 3GB... Cool, so if we apply file system compression to the .app bundle it will likely be around 1 GB on disk, which is only 200-300 MB more

Re: Suggestion: No more language packs for macOS as they are fundamentally broken

o-i-enable-transparent-compression > On 21 May 2020, at 12:48, Eivind Samseth wrote: > > Sounds like a good solution, as the current method is fundamentally broken > wrt code-signing, and is an extra step for users > > How big would the .app bundle be? That would be the onl

Re: Suggestion: No more language packs for macOS as they are fundamentally broken

Sounds like a good solution, as the current method is fundamentally broken wrt code-signing, and is an extra step for users How big would the .app bundle be? That would be the only drawback I see the LO Vanilla build is 2.2 GB vs 0.8 GB for a single language build This is still less than MS Off

Re: ESC meeting agenda: 2020-05-21 16:00 Berlin time

ISHEK PACHORKAR ) > - https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/89756 > tdf#38885: Remove CreateTextFromNode methods ( ABHISHEK PACHORKAR ) > - https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/89938 > tdf#131218 Assure standard mode at shell before goto content ( Jim > Raykow

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sysui/desktop

sysui/desktop/macosx/Info.plist.in |9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) New commits: commit 32eac748c508640bec036975c0a91ea904c729a2 Author: Eivind Samseth AuthorDate: Sat May 16 14:39:33 2020 +0200 Commit: Tor Lillqvist CommitDate: Sat May 16 20:39:58 2020 +0200 tdf

Eivind Samseth - license statement

All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: How do you perform a partial build on macOS?

bundle! Now, next step is to submit the patch for bug 103644 (on the package-format, on Mac it would be dmg, but that was not needed) > On 16 May 2020, at 14:19, Michael Stahl wrote: > > On 16.05.20 14:17, Eivind Samseth wrote: >> Thanks, >> I have done a complete buil

Re: How do you perform a partial build on macOS?

[ALL] top level modules: build-non-l10n-only build-l10n-only > On 11 May 2020, at 10:33, Michael Stahl wrote: > > On 10.05.20 20:44, Eivind Samseth wrote: >> Hello, >> I set up the build environment and successfully built the current master and >> .app bundle >> Now

Re: Compiling LO on macOS using lode - yasm and nasm not found

Hello Julien, I just followed the link on the build script had to libjpeg-turbo, which then suggested homebrew as the recommended method of installation The BuildingOnMac page doesn’t reference yasm or nasm at all, not sure if it rather should be included in the packages the lode environment set

How do you perform a partial build on macOS?

Hello, I set up the build environment and successfully built the current master and .app bundle Now I wanted to make a change to the Info.plist file to fix this bug: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103644 I’ve set up logerrit, created a new local branch, and edited sysui/des

Compiling LO on macOS using lode - yasm and nasm not found

Hello, I’m trying a build of LO on macOS using lode but get a warning message that yasm and nasm is not found I have followed the instructions on the libjpeg-turbo to install using Homebrew, but that doesn’t help (yes, yasm and nasm was installed a few months ago, so it is in my $PATH) Anyone e

Re: MacOS support; agenda item ESC

> On 9 May 2020, at 22:02, Ilmari Lauhakangas > wrote: > Minimum runtime support is evaluated periodically based on OS version market > share vs. our maintenance burden & potential wins regarding new language and > platform features. > > Since LibO 6.3 release we can see 10.10 market share ha

Re: MacOS support; agenda item ESC

> On 4 May 2020, at 15:17, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Thank you; very helpful - I expect Tor may have some time to look at > some of these. Great! Aside, while looking at bug this bug it occurred to me, why does LO support macOS 10.10? https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956

No Mac nightly builds available

There’s no mac nightly builds available at the moment https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/current.html Last may have been from April 13 https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/MacOSX-x86_64@tb81-TDF/ ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libr

Re: MacOS support; agenda item ESC

Hello, here’s some input from me after having tested quite a few macOS bugs through the years: The download page needs to show some of the different known issues. E.g., today it should show a warning on Catalina that you may need to grant LO "Full Disk Access” if running on a standard account o

Budget 2020 proposals and macOS Catalina support / onboarding

Hello, I see there is a proposal for the budget 2020 to fix the macOS 10.15 notarization, and the longstanding issues in the ESC calls about fixing this bug and a save as behavior bug https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2020#Fix_macOS_10.15_notarization

Blurry display on Retina macOS computers

> On 12 Feb 2020, at 09:23, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > In a nutshell, you need to build with macOS SDK 10.13, as SDK 10.14 and 10.15 > produce blurry results > > But that sounds just like a silly workaround. Does anybody have any insight > in what the actual thing going on here is? > > --tml

Re: ESC meeting minutes: 2020-01-30

working major release, 6.2, for a majority of macOS users Best, Eivind > On 30 Jan 2020, at 20:04, Eivind Samseth wrote: > > >> On 30 Jan 2020, at 16:25, Miklos Vajna wrote: >> >> * QA update (Xisco) >> + Most pressing bugs: >>Old: >>

Re: ESC meeting minutes: 2020-01-30

> On 30 Jan 2020, at 16:25, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > * QA update (Xisco) >+ Most pressing bugs: > Old: > + After Update to 6.1.4 on macOS fonts are blurred on retina > display (xcode 10) >+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122218 > + pro