Yevhen Holienishchev wrote
LibreOffice don't like Bitcoin symbol, and trying to change cell height.
When I paste data in blank document created in Libre, it's changing height
of all row.
There is definitively a bug with text alignment when using the Bitcoin
symbol (checked with LO 4.4.1.1
Robinson Tryon wrote
17,892 total user accounts in Bugzilla, comprising
536 users who have successfully migrated from FDO,
17,002 who haven't, and
354 new accounts.
So, in total 890 registered users (pretty good!)
Robinson Tryon wrote
In terms of activity, we've had
448 users active in
, the same user will be accounted 7 times if he
logged all the 7 days... This is probably not noticeable in 7 days but it
escalates when you sum 30 days...
I'm not an SQL wizard but you probably want the max last_seen for each user
in the given period...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message
0 files changed
New commits:
commit 0cea7cc1254241b4505f15256e398bc5bf3e0ab8
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Fri Feb 13 23:34:30 2015 +
Use text/xml instead of application/xml in svn:mime-type
This is the recomended value in Subversion's svn-eol-style.txt
Writer:
- Implement Image crop tool similar to the one present in Impress,
Sidebar:
- Implement an Insert subcategory in the Properties tab of the Sidebar in
Writer/Calc/Excel,
- Implement a Data subcategory in the Properties tab of the Sidebar in
Calc,
General
- Allow to use different shapes in
.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LibreOffice-Bugzilla-Migration-We-re-done-Please-visit-the-new-site-to-reset-your-pas-tp4137327p4137577.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
|2 +-
ucb/source/ucp/webdav/SerfTypes.hxx|2 +-
ucb/source/ucp/webdav/SerfUri.hxx |2 +-
12 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 44fda43ca6846b25201eaa7812eb90fc7f79faac
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
external_deps.lst |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
New commits:
commit 1c1efea327d26d61e3feccbd0ee0275707ba997d
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Fri Jan 23 18:45:39 2015 +
Update URL2 for croscorefonts.
We have been carrying the newer fonts for a while
suddently got better ;-)
+1 when viewing a simple XLS file and a several page ODT
+1 on WPS office
I really hope LibreOffice will become a full function office soon. Using
40Mb for a slow VIEWER only doesn't make any sense...
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi Robinson
Robinson Tryon wrote
- New URL: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/
I get This Connection is Untrusted caused by bugs.documentfoundation.org
uses an invalid security certificate.
Hopefully this will be fixed before migration?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context
configure.in | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 86b9900dc449b7b54a4605521b8929ce1a5aebc9
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Fri Jan 16 20:47:02 2015 +
Revert most of r1651396:
We really don't use libwpd but it left some
scp2/source/ooo/file_font_ooo.scp |4 -
6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d8020927231297bc7faa3bab3d20ee2041eb050a
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Tue Jan 13 16:12:12 2015 +
Update ChromeOS fonts to version 1.23.0
, 73 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 87f6fe9767e845419b8e55ab524aa831b5372f4e
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Sun Jan 11 20:54:52 2015 +
Beanshell 2.0b5 update
The Beanshell source code has been licensed to the Apache Software
Foundation under
changed, 74 insertions(+), 598 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 4ac141eb9915e095d8b86779e7159f644a06e629
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Mon Jan 12 01:10:25 2015 +
Beanshell 2.0b5 update
The Beanshell source code has been licensed to the Apache Software
Foundation
, 88 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 88c30d32457c09fe31502589563affbf776a05bf
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Sun Jan 11 23:41:29 2015 +
Temporarily revert the Beanshell update.
It requires more work.
diff --git a/LICENSE_category_b b
configure.in | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit c8ba5cef726e7ece43accf98b9d014c31699d850
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Mon Jan 12 02:31:01 2015 +
Beanshell's license is not Category B anymore.
diff --git a/configure.in
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
Florian Reisinger wrote
The bigger problem is the following:
User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A
disagrees and puts the state to
1) REOPENED
2) NEEDINFO
Sorry to say, but this error will continue...
+1
Maybe QA people become aware of this unlogic
Hi Tommy, all
Tommy wrote
pedro take a look at my other post. we probably need to change the WFM
status change behaviour to something more logical and easier to handle.
It obviously needs a solution. If REOPENED is reserved for developers (and
in that case it should be visible ONLY for them
Adam Fyne wrote
Who is responsible for this machine and can maybe quickly check it out?
FYI There is a table in the wikipedia with the contact person for each
Tinderbox
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox#List_of_registered_Tinderboxes
Hope this helps ;)
--
View this
Couldn't agree more with Nino's answer.
If people are loosing data (i.e. typed words while not looking at the
screen) then there is a problem.
It is NOT a BUG but it is clearly a LIMITATION. It must be possible to save
in the background while input continues... Obviously the words typed since
Bug reported here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80232
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-3-0-rc1-test-builds-available-tp4112813p4112898.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all
I'm glad the RC was released. Betas are not the real test.
First problem: installing 4.3 does not remove the now empty 4.2 Startup
Group under Windows (at least in this system running Win7 Pro x64)
--
View this message in context:
svx/source/sidebar/line/LineWidthControl.cxx | 27 ---
svx/source/sidebar/line/LineWidthControl.hxx |4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit a41e5ef986377d9bacf8cd317b60cf9b9e2cdd2a
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date
1ad216c0b831fc10ff4e73392dbcc9832463a7bc
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Mon Jun 16 03:07:14 2014 +
Sidebar: fix some typos in function naming.
Mostly found by:Noel Grandin
Reviewed by:Andre Fischer
diff --git a/svx/source/sidebar/line/LineWidthControl.cxx
Hi Jay, all
I do have a scanner (or two) but not Win7...
Anyway, answered in Bugzilla.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Anyone-with-a-scanner-tp4111662p4111731.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Performing a Parallel Install of LO43 Beta2 under Windows XP Pro SP3 en_US
x86 returns
https://www.dropbox.com/s/lrumjkpjwah1tdz/Screenshot%202014-06-06%2015.49.50.png
--
View this message in context:
Excellent idea! Sorting by priority and separating by OS does speed up
selecting where to start.
Well done!
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Suggested-Triage-Order-tp435p4111205.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Windows-Printing-Bug-Needs-Confirmed-tp4110273p4110336.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing
Hi Joel
jmadero wrote
To download /_*latest daily build*_/ of 4.3 please go here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
Clearly none of my business but wouldn't it make more sense that everybody
is using the same build aka the official Beta1 instead of getting a build
from some
-beta1-test-builds-available-td4109795.html
Have a nice beta testing weekend ;)
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-4-3-Bug-Hunting-Weekend-tp4109732p4109802.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
: the problem is the spellchecker (which
is not a part of LO?). Can you solve the problem?
If the problem is still reproducible why is bug report
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 closed?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Running-LO-4-3
Tommy wrote
IMHO not a good idea... the mature term would be prone to jokes..
try type mature in google and see all the embarassing results... :-D
+1
Mature is really a bad choice.
Maybe Vintage?
Just a thought...
--
View this message in context:
Yes, this is true. You get LibreOffice 4.2 is up to date. This is also
true for Version: 4.2.1.1 and Version: 4.2.2.1
Also information hasn't been updated for branch 4.1 (which affects branch
4.0 and previous) but I guess this is the normal delay.
HTH,
Pedro
--
View this message in context
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
also enabled updates to 4.1.6 and 4.2.4 while I was at it..
Thanks!
Wow! This is definitely the fastest update notice in LO history! Version
4.2.4 was announced at 12:01pm and is available at 3:00pm!
If only someone with programming skills would write a script to do
Hi Christian
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
If only someone with programming skills would write a script to do this
automatically when a new version is announced/available...
As I have written so many times already: It is intentional that the
update is not done at the very same day.
I made
it on the same machine where the crash
occurred.
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Running-LO-4-3-alpha-in-Windows-XP-tp4107585p4107794.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
center. I will test 4.3 again when
RC1 is out.
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Running-LO-4-3-alpha-in-Windows-XP-tp4107585p4107840.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List
, just in case it
was corrupted. It didn't make any difference if I deleted or not.
Has this been reported? Is this a Windows XP problem?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Running-LO-4-3-alpha-in-Windows-XP-tp4107585.html
Sent from the QA mailing
(+), 48 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit aa12ecb54b91ee7632a4adb9a6859d5a89b90602
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Wed Apr 30 22:18:41 2014 +
Fix build with gcc on FreeBSD-i386.
There is an issue building the bridges module with newer versions
of gcc. Merge a local
UnoControls/source/base/basecontainercontrol.cxx |2 +-
readlicense_oo/license/NOTICE|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 4d878a080907211f827bdf42184e98075a4ad0f5
Author: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Date: Tue Apr 29 19:30:16
directory)?
I don't think so. The problem here is selecting a folder (which the program
is not expecting and shouldn't allow)
When using the Windows dialog the folder is ignored and there is no crash.
Bug 64654 is about reaching some limit...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
(I haven't verified because I stopped
using daily builds)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Crash-in-Impress-when-you-add-a-directory-and-a-single-picture-to-the-Photo-Album-tp4103514p4103575.html
Sent from the QA mailing list
that the patch for the bug was submitted
yesterday. So your build from the 25th couldn't possibly include the fix :)
Try with today and/or tomorrow's build and if it isn't fixed report a new
bug.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Crash
anyone know if this is a limitation of
the FODT file format or a bug in LO?
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Closing-Help-License-Information-shows-StartCenter-without-any-menus-tp4101742p4101846.html
Sent from the QA mailing list
)...
I wasn't offending anyone and I am/was also a volunteer. In any case, as you
can see from the (lack of) replies, not many people agree with my point. So
don't worry ;)
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/4-2-1-is-a-Stable-version
to be early adopters
or that they are power users???
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/4-2-1-is-a-Stable-version-tp4100538p4100696.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/
Since when an x.x.1 version is Stable???
LibreOffice is available in the following stable versions:
4.1.5
4.2.1
You (TDF) don't even follow your own rules. This is all a joke!
I guess you have still haven't understood why
Hi Christian, *
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
They are not for conservative users, but that is different from being
stable vs testing.
You are right about Stable vs Testing. My mistake (but that is just
nit-picking...)
The fact that version 4.2.1 is being pushed to every new user (with an
didn't even get to the part of
opening the browser...
Interestingly, it only finishes in LO 4.0.6.2... Seems to be a regression...
Also in LO 4.0.6.2 the Creation and Modification dates are automatically set
to the current date and time while in 4.1 and 4.2 these fields are blank...
Cheers,
Pedro
and even the emails are unanswered, I really
don't know what happened to QA.
I know this doesn't help, but at least you know your email works...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Moztrap-Does-LO-4-2-2-1-s-grammarchecker-ignores
Hi Christian
Pedro wrote
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
As that bug doesn't reference any commit that fixes the problem, I
cannot tell whether the problem is fixed or not in 4.2.2 branch.
Fair enough. I will check 4.2.2.1 for that specific bug.
Unfortunately the bug
https
Windows XP using LO 4.2.1.1
I'm not on the Portuguese speaking language team... Is there such a Team in
QA?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-bug-confirmation-with-PT-language-tp4099072p4099078.html
Sent from the QA mailing list
version to version.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Urgent-clarification-for-Bug-submitters-triagers-Attention-Devs-tp4098638p4098800.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List
. Thanks!
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Urgent-clarification-for-Bug-submitters-triagers-Attention-Devs-tp4098638p4098871.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
) there will be a 4.2.2 release (with no dailies) and the bugs fixed in
4.2.3 will be released with 4.2.3 (so it would make sense to request this
regression fix to be cherry picked?)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Urgent-clarification-for-Bug
Hi Sophie
sophi wrote
Just for information, this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61167
is not a bug and works as designed :)
You are right. But it is a missing feature and it would have been nicer to
suggest the reporter to submit a Feature Request than closing the bug...
IMO
jmadero wrote
As you know, it's not for production so using
on really important things is not recommended but if at all possible,
install and test :)
And yet it was released yesterday and it is now the main download...
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/
I didn't even get half way through
not understand your point he sees this as you
using force to shut him up.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-bug-61167-tp4098287p4098334.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
with version 27...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4097863p4097888.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
in
a LO presentation and view previously inserted PDFs... So the plugin is not
needed for viewing or inserting PDFs in presentations???
Maybe this connection to the plugin is not needed at all?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Backtracing
, so that LO won't load it/try the
same with the adobe reader plugin for example.
I don't use Adobe Reader. I tested temporarily removing the plugin. LO still
crashes.
I hope the Bug report is enough to provide some ideas to the Devs...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
is x64 compatible only. Is this a current
limitation or was it a mistake?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Update-on-Bisect-GUI-4-Windows-tp4095824p4096224.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
remains as
UNCONFIRMED...
The two methods suggested don't work:
1) Windbg locks soffice.bin as soon as I attach it to the process so I can
not open the file that crashes LO
2) procdump does not detect the crash
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi Henri
mhenriday wrote
But my question remains :
would the developers find introducing such a feature into Calc, which,
from
what you write, I gather would not be too difficult to do, worthwhile ?
Again, it might not be a bad idea to be able to point to yet another area
in which LibO
Hi Henri
mhenriday wrote
My question is - would it be difficult to provide such an option in Calc
? LibreOffice is often accused of simply attempting to catch up to MS
Office ; perhaps including a feature like the forenamed could help to
change minds and to put it on quite a few computers
/
This is all just a joke, isn't it???
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-2-0-RC3-available-tp4093729p4094684.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List
Hi Jean-Baptiste
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote
sophi wrote
It's no a blocker, there is no data loss
Pedro a écrit
Actually that is not true. If you print to PDF or to paper and give that
to
someone convinced that it is the same as what is on your screen, there is
in
fact data loss.
I
and/or Germanophone big?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-QuickHelp-for-Letter-wizard-in-Writer-not-translated-tp4094067p4094106.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name
insert one picture at a time with Insert Image From
file... then you can Undo. It's only the Photo Album action that can't be
undone...
I would say it is a Bug (something forgotten, missing). But probably devs
will consider adding this as an Enhancement Request...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View
Bug confirmed (as you have probably been notified already)
I marked it as Blocker but I seriously doubt that it will block release...
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-2-0-RC3-available-tp4093729p4093756.html
Sent from
Hi Sophie
sophi wrote
It's no a blocker, there is no data loss
Actually that is not true. If you print to PDF or to paper and give that to
someone convinced that it is the same as what is on your screen, there is in
fact data loss.
Just saying...
Thanks!
Pedro
--
View this message
in the name of Test number 18 in English Create a new Math do_c_ument
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-run-ready-for-RC3-tp4093033p4093610.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
) it seems that testing is very inconclusive. Most tests show 2%
completion except for 4.2.0 beta2 which was EN_US only (23%)...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-run-ready-for-RC3-tp4093033p4093620.html
Sent from the QA mailing
Windows testers around)
Isn't it possible that the list of Locale languages is the same as the
number of languages available in LO?
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?type=win-x86version=4.1.4lang=pick
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
Until RC3 is out, if someone wants to test RC2 with some of the combinations
(Architecture / Locale / Platform) not yet tested, the binaries are
available here
http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/4.2.0.2/
--
View this message in context:
a button to Edit with... (as
suggested by Astron)
IF Adobe would agree to this, then it would easily become a standard...
Maybe TDF's Marketing and PR could make this happen???
In fact this format would be a great idea for Latex files (as mentioned by
user SPM) and possibly others...
Cheers,
Pedro
Windows XP.
Which LO version and OS are you using?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-odt-to-pdf-file-extension-question-tp4091953p4091969.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi Jean
Jean Weber wrote
The user guides refer to the built-in Help system which is reached
by pressing F1 or choosing Help LibreOffice Help on the menu bar.
Built-in may not be the best term but it is short, descriptive, and
literal. Is it obvious? Your call.
As I mentioned in the
or appreciate such changes. In addition double
extensions usually trigger anti-virus warnings...
Just my 2 cents...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-odt-to-pdf-file-extension-question-tp4091953p4092080.html
Sent from the QA mailing list
).
Could it be a problem with Java 8? Is LO ready for Java 8?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-SIGSEV-after-clicking-through-different-QuickStarter-entries-and-closing-it-tp4091856p4091876.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
next time ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LO-4-2-0-2-opens-OLH-in-browser-instead-of-its-own-OLH-tp4091348p4091682.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List
was bundled
with the installer (I still think TDF should go back to that model) but now
it's a separate download, so it's not really built-in...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-The-term-Online-Help-was-Use-of-abbreviations-in-this-ML
...
In this particular case OLH could be On Line Help or Off Line Help...
Just my 2 cents...
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LO-4-2-0-2-opens-OLH-in-browser-instead-of-its-own-OLH-tp4091348p4091575.html
Sent from the QA mailing
,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LO-4-2-0-2-opens-OLH-in-browser-instead-of-its-own-OLH-tp4091348p4091636.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
it to the wiki.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-2-RC1-aka-4-2-0-1-tp4088744p4088967.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address
to explain: I am aware that you can't really
NOT install a Module and that it is only the Start Menu shortcuts that are
not added to the folder/menu)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-4-2-RC1-aka-4-2-0-1-tp4088744.html
Sent from the QA
Hi Andras
Andras Timar-3 wrote
Explanation in short: this optionality made little sense
I agree. Thank you for the quick answer.
It saves me the trouble of reporting a bug just to find out that it's a
feature :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
step could be left for the advanced QA people :)
Does this make sense or am i missing the point about bibi?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bibisect-Roundup-tp4087994p4088011.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
Robinson Tryon wrote
I'm not sure I understand this bibi stuff but isn't it easier to have a
user
friendly version that just runs the last release of each branch (actually
that is what I do with portable versions under Windows)?
What kind of search pattern do you use?
It is not that
Robinson Tryon wrote
You'll just need Cygwin or Git-Bash or whatever we recommend for
development work
on Windows for the git operations :-)
I'm sorry... That is *not* English :) Developese is not one of my languages
;)
I meant easier than triaging a bug as in even a dumb non-developer can do
Some old requests
1) Clear explanation of what are the differences between the builds from the
several TB.
If there are none then one daily build per OS is enough
2) If no one cares to explain then please indicate which is the recommended
build to test.
Currently my understanding is that the
Hi Harald
Harald Köster-3 wrote
in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69153 a described a bug
which is at least similar to your observation.
Thank you for the heads up ;)
Bug confirmed (as you have already been notified ;) )
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
4.1.4.1 and everything is working as
expected.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LO-s-spellchecker-shows-grammar-errors-hints-in-English-though-UI-is-in-German-tp4087185p4087202.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
wrong? which is much better than Does he known,
that he has wrong. but still isn't correct English...
So, the answer is B) grammar check is not usable at all only spell
checking is performed (which means that the menu option name Spelling and
Grammar is misleading)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View
Hi Andras
Andras Timar-3 wrote
The built-in English grammar checker (Lightproof) does not know many
rules. It does not mean, that B) grammar check is not usable at all.
It works as designed.
I'm sorry but I couldn't avoid laughing at this...
Works as designed? Yes, this is true. It is
recovery loop.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Grammar-check-does-not-work-when-there-is-no-spellcheck-in-a-document-tp4087188p4087225.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
see the yellow bar
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LO-s-spellchecker-shows-grammar-errors-hints-in-English-though-UI-is-in-German-tp4087185p4087244.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
/spelling_msg.png
Hope this helps ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LO-s-spellchecker-shows-grammar-errors-hints-in-English-though-UI-is-in-German-tp4087185p4087306.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Aids ;)
I can confirm the same error under Windows XP Pro x86 Sp3 en_US using 4.2
Beta2
If you click on Characters before line break: 0 and then click on the Edit
button you also get the Hyphenation dialog with Characters before break: 2
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
601 - 700 of 1081 matches
Mail list logo
