On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 13:34 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi all,
For information, I published a blog about QA
http://sophiegautier.com/blog/index.php/2012/11/12/184-are-you-a-contributor-part-6-qa
If you see anything missing, pleas add a comment. Thanks!
Sophie,
I notice that both your
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 09:04 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Terrence Enger wrote:
I have played with it a little bit, and it looks really neat.
Thoughts arising ...
Hi Terrence,
thanks a lot for looking into this -
(3) That start-and-end, with nothing in between, takes about 28
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 03:43 -0600, Yi Fan Jiang wrote:
Hey people,
I have brought OpenID to Moztrap this week, the following is the test
page for login:
http://vm12.documentfoundation.org/openid/login/
Login example:
Google user: https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id
Yahoo
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 11:36 +0200, Alexander Ernst wrote:
Hello,
I have a Libre-Office-Calc Problem. I think it is really a
Libre-Office-Problem and I don't know, who can help or who can solve the
problem. The poblem is very annoying. :-/
If I have opened more than one File, the function
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/REVIEW-3-6-trivial-cups-thread-init-issue-tp4008339p4009665.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/commit-message-cites-wrong-bug-tp4009211.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/build-failure-after-git-new-workdir-tp4008803.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
fdo#34268 FILEOPEN Writer hangs indefinitely when opening attached
.doc [1] seems to be in abeyance in my environment. Comments in the
report say that the bug was observerd in MacOS X and MS Win Vista.
Would testers on those platforms check that the bug has disappeared
for them too? I think that
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Proposal-for-Hard-Hacks-tp4007279p4007315.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
John Smith wrote
For those interested the results can be found here :
http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/clang-analyzer/libreoffice/
For some source files reporting Other Error under the
heading analyzer failures, for example
connectivity/source/drivers/file/fanalyzer.cxx, the links
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/same-id-twice-in-dbaccess-source-ui-inc-FieldDescControl-hxx-tp4000772p4000819.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/same-id-twice-in-dbaccess-source-ui-inc-FieldDescControl-hxx-tp4000772p4000862.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/CHANGEUPLOAD-FAILED-ONGERRIT-leaked-ODBC-statement-handles-tp4000433p4000479.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp3999026p3999541.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp3999026p3999546.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Not being registered with gerrit (because I lack OpenId), I recently
tried
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-July/035330.html
to submit a patch via email.
Despite checking the open patches on gerrit occasionally thereafter, I
never caught it showing my patch. Lionel Elie
Thank you, David.
This sounds neat. When (if?) I have another patch to submit, I shall
check back to see if it is place.
Terry.
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 23:02 +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
about how it will be possible to use gerrit at the command line,
authenticating by a shared key rather
c7e9585283ef989dc50fc12b90333fe60944f726 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:46:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] stop some leaked statement handles
Change-Id: I06764e0569ea615e66de6cd5946614c7c538e60e
---
.../source/drivers/odbcbase/OConnection.cxx
at 05:15 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:46:14PM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 19:08 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:15:02PM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
I am chasing some leaked ODBC statement handles.
I see
I am sorry for the length. I hope some of it is interesting.
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 19:08 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:15:02PM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
I am chasing some leaked ODBC statement handles.
I see that ODatabaseMetaDataResultSet.cxx takes care
Greetings,
I am chasing some leaked ODBC statement handles.
I see that ODatabaseMetaDataResultSet.cxx takes care *not* to free a
statement handle which has not been subjected to one of 13 member
functions with names starting open Questions arising ...
(1) Why should this protection be
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 21:11 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 10/07/12 16:42, Miklos Vajna wrote:
Hi,
I try to run make check before pushing from time to time (and when it
fails, I usually refer to Stephan's tinderbox to see if I can ignore the
failure), but since commit
well, nowhere is it
written that I shall understand everything.
/aside
From 37c3004e4c95433aa63a53295e93d181e432d11e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:32:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Wunused-but-set-variable was new in gcc 4.6
Condition
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 22:46 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:47:48PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
My point is basically that it is too much of an investment for a
casual contributor... If we could make that easier by allowing plain
username+password
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:48 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
While looking into this bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48348
I noticed that we actually allow saving and loading of document in print
preview mode. But to me that feels very odd. Allowing to print from
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:48 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
While looking into this bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48348
I noticed that we actually allow saving and loading of document in print
preview mode. But to me that feels very odd. Allowing to print from
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 17:59 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Nino schrieb:
Who is in charge of the list? Could you ban this Groupon Urbano
spammer?
Hi,
done! Thank you for the hint.
Rainer
Hmm, it looks like this spammer is still getting through:
First, my thanks to Caolán McNamara and Stephan Bergmann for helping
me with my build problems.
Now, my build is successful, but soffice.bin falls over quickly with
css::uno::DeploymentException. Before the program ends, I see ten
exceptions being thrown and caught; the attachment has a
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 23:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
you are probably running into this problem, which can be resolved by
deleting something from your user profile:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/28734
Heh, heh, heh. When I was watching the
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:18 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 17:17 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
I am trying to build master commit id 5c2c0e3, pulled 2012-05-08, on
ubuntu-natty (11.04), and it is failing in unit test sal_osl_file.
You didn't flip from a system cppunit
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 14:23 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/09/2012 11:17 PM, Terrence Enger wrote:
I am trying to build master commit id 5c2c0e3, pulled 2012-05-08, on
ubuntu-natty (11.04), and it is failing in unit test sal_osl_file.
I saw this exact same strange error
I am trying to build master commit id 5c2c0e3, pulled 2012-05-08, on
ubuntu-natty (11.04), and it is failing in unit test sal_osl_file.
An excerpt from the terminal output from `make sal` is in attachment
20120509c. I think the bad address passed to free() is just a
secondary error, right? Is
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:02 +0100, Joop KIEFTE wrote:
Can anyone identify what's the problem in this document or in
LibreOffice?
Joop Kiefte
Joop,
I have taken it upon myself to file bug 47545 FILEOPEN,VIEWING:
different position of some items
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 15:18 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
IMO, we need a tag for bugs related to experimental turned on/off
See comment https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43869#c24
I went off and started working on this before seeing your message.
So, to bring you up-to-date with
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 20:13 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
[snip]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=QA/HowToBibisect
That is strictly for 64-bit Linux, right?
Terry.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:31 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 03/02/12 17:21, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 02/03/2012 04:18 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 03/02/12 14:01, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
The standard idiom is
for (iterator i = m.begin(); i != m.end();) {
if (doErase) {
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 12:17 -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
a question, which Stephan Bergmann answered even as I was
writing.
Thank you, Stephan.
Terry.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 18:30 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 03/02/12 18:17, Terrence Enger wrote:
Stephan, I am sorry to question your expertise, but I wonder ... is
your reassurance based on knowledge of the language standard, or is
based on observed behaviour of C++ compilers?
hahaha
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 09:16 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
I created a wiki page for cppunit at
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/cppunit . I am also going to
notify the Fedora maintainer(s) of cppunit that the project is alive
again :)
Perhaps it would be good to add a point on
Comments 6, 7, and 8 on bug 45254
EDITING postgreSQL-SDBC Can not edit data
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45254 show a
pattern which is unhappily familiar:
Q: Please tell me X.
A: But X is obvious.
I wonder if it would be a good idea to say, somewhere in the
wiki pages
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 22:23 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Eike,
Eike Rathke wrote (02-01-12 22:18)
On Wednesday, 2011-12-28 17:18:02 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
But that does not change the title bar of the window?
It does, but apparently only in an --enable-dbgutil build. Sorry for
Greetings *,
I have stumbled upon file sw/source/core/bigpointerarray-new.hxx,
but I have not found any place where it is used. In particular
both opengrok full search for bigpointerarry and git-grep for
bigpointerarray come up empty. And yet, the file was last
maintained in May, 2011.
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 12:05 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 16/12/11 10:52, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Yes. I would assume that the destructor's expectation is legitimate,
and that the code keeping the container non-empty is in error.
well yes it means that there is some cursor still
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 08:56 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 12/15/2011 12:59 AM, Terrence Enger wrote:
[snip]
How on earh can soffice.bin know that I did anything in
gnome-terminal?
Due to the clipboard being a resource shared across all applications.
aside audience=self
Calm
I see something that I thought was impossible ...
Running on ubuntu-natty, with commit ids 61fce03 (pulled
2011-12-02) and 4097499 (pulled 2011-12-08) running under
gdb in gnome-terminal, I highlighted three lines with the
mouse and did right-click copy. soffice.bin raises the
assertion in
I just noticed that `make dev-install` has been producing
messages ...
| WARNING(S):
| Following modules are inconsistent/missing: instsetoo_native
| Some module(s) contain old output tree(s)!
|
| ATTENTION: If you are performing an incompatible build, please break the
build with
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 20:17 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Terrance,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:00:39PM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
(*) pull again and build?
^- This
Thank you. That did the job.
should be fixed with:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:25 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi list,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:21:41PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Will the real creator of EasyHack 38884 please stand up and clarify?
Also please CC yourself on the EasyHack you created ;)
still no takers? If nobody
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 21:27 +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote:
Le 08/08/2011 21:11, Terrence Enger a écrit :
Hi all,
Seems like someone on Bugzilla is having a similar problem with
date/time imports via ODBC :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42658
Thank you for the heads-up
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 14:30 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(One thing we
could IMO improve though, is to not rely on trying to save open
documents from within a signal handler, but instead rely on frequent
auto-save and roll back to the
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:49 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
Hi Muthu,
18.11.2011 15:38, Muthu Subramanian K пишет:
That code is inside the constructor.
and the constructor sets the variable pUndoSet to NULL right on the top.
So, the if would always fail! Unless I am missing something. Looks
My cross-posting to dev and qa lists is deliberate; if you
find that it is the wrong thing to do, I shall have to
apologize.
On the dev list,
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 10:31 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
There has been a lot of discussion in the past about raised
assertions and how seriously
There has been a lot of discussion in the past about raised
assertions and how seriously they should be treated. Is
there a current concensus?
I raise the question again for no better reason than that
even a newbie like me can see a raised assertion and collect
a backtrace. Guidance welcome.
is built with ordinary configuration option
--enable-dbgutil), while OSL_TRACE requires at least
dbglevel=2. All this, I think, favours OSL_ENSURE.
But, on the other hand, ...
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 23:18 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 10/24/2011 05:59 PM, Terrence Enger wrote:
I shall
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 09:16 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
In general, and if the expression's value is not used, prefix
increment/decrement is preferable to postfix, as the former conceptually
avoids creation of a temporary that makes the old, unmodified value
available as the
welcome.
Terry.
From a479ceb4fae631640c15f35f1cd8b91513632324 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:37:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] leaking connection handle
call SQLDisconnect;
check returns from SQLDisconnect and SQLFreeHandle
---
.../source
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 10:32 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 11:11 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Hmm. Is my question really of no interest? Or did I just time it
badly with respect to the big conference?
It's the wrong list really, libreoffice-dev is a better choice
Hmm. Is my question really of no interest? Or did I just time it
badly with respect to the big conference?
Terry.
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 09:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
I notice that at least some calls from Base to ODBC routines
fail to check the return code, and I wonder what we should
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 15:09 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Just ignore the function that diff reports :) (Or send a patch to GNU
diffutils so that it recognises C++ syntax ;-) )
Thank you for your reassurance that I am not hallucinating.
All-in-all, I guess my attention is better applied
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 15:27 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I did not read *all* of it, but it seems the ODBC documentation
contains no such madness. So my guess is that the Microsoft
implementation of SQL-CLI that is ODBC defines that handles cross
compilation units. IMHO the other
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 13:31 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
I pushed my patch, mostly because its the simplest, and Lionel can
double-check it later at his leisure.
I agree.
(*) Both patches discard milliseconds. I *guess* this is
the right thing to do, but would welcome others'
Whoops. As soon as I saw this come back to me, I realized that I had
written the exact opposite of the truth.
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:09 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
For comparison, I tried inserting a value with too much
precision into a TIMESTAMP(4) field in PostgreSQL. The
result
On the topic of machine translation of German comments in LibreOffice
source code ...
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 17:25 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Wednesday 05 of October 2011, Noel Grandin wrote:
Yeah, the results are clunky.
I think it might make sense to include the machine translated
I am sorry for the length of this answer; hope it is worth
reading.
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 11:27 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 14:13 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
My interest is in the fractions of seconds in times and
timestamps, an interest provoked by bug 34309 Error
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 11:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:02 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
The validity of a handle in a compilation unit other
than the one in which the identified resource was
allocated is implementation-defined.
If I had to guess
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:25 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 29/09/11 18:02, Terrence Enger a écrit :
Hi Terry,
Not sure whether what I have in my memory has any bearing on this, but...
I remember discussions with Frank Schoenheit back from the OOo days
about mysql ODBC driver
My future patches to LibreOffice project, in absence of notice
to the contrary, are under LGPLv3+/MPL1.1 dual license or future
versions of the licenses.
Terrence Enger,
commonly known as Terry.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice
Silly me! While reading some of the LibreOffice code for
ODBC connections, I started to look at ...
ISO/IEC FCD 9075-3:2006(E)
Title: Information technology - Database Languages - SQL
- Part 3: Call-Level Interface (SQL/CLI)
I hope this report of difficulty doing a rebuild of
LibreOffice will be of some interest. If the tale is not
sufficiently sad and long to satisfy you, I can offer a
typescript, 73000 lines so far and still growing grin /.
The following points surprise me:
(*) Rebuild failed. I see room here for
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:56 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
2/ I had a spike in IRC questions/confusions from new tentative
contributors on that topic, so I wanted to make it as newbie friendly
as possible. iow a 'just fscking work' approach.
Cache compression is advertised as saving space in
Talking about compression of the ccache cache, ...
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 11:35 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Well, my boxes are usually cpu bound (even with a fully hot ccache)
and I have plenty of space for my ccache, so that is not that clear a
choice to me.
So, unconditional compression
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 12:47 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com
wrote:
I notice, BTW, that How to build LibreOffice
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build no
longer says that we automatically enable
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 20:22 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 09 of September 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Could somebody else, preferably with a somewhat more common system :), post
their results, so that we can compare? I assume the ccache overhead (caused
by I/O I'd say) is
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 14:22 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Now granted, once we can reliably do incremental build, the question
of the effectiveness of ccache will be much more acute.
presumable incremental build only try to compile stuff that _need_ to
be compiled and therefore should be a
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 11:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Terence,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Resolution: I hereby resolve that I shall ask about my next
rebuild problem *before* I confuse things beyond
description.
Heh - unfortunately, incremental
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:38 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
[snip]
So, can I just rename ItemHolder2 in svtools to ItemHolder3 ?
I have a vague memory from the times of OpenOffice.org of a
numeric suffix on a name indicating the number of template
parameters. Templates with Helper in the name,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Terry,
If you're discussing code in detail you're much more than welcome
here[1] :-) really looking forward to your first patch - do you have
problems building that we can help out with ?
Harrumph. I started last week to do a
Meta-reply: I am far from contributing a patch, so my
thoughts are off-topic for this list. I am happy to take
this conversation to private email or to the discussion list
if that would better suit the list recipients.
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:43 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
[ Premise: If you
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 11:40 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Lubos,
(snip)
Not true either. Default ccache size is 1GB, and that is enough when
you focus on one branch. (a build uses less than 500MB)
Just a note about what I have observed, for anybody who
happens to care.
I have
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 21:33 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 11:40 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Not true either. Default ccache size is 1GB, and that is enough when
you focus
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 15:10 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 14:01 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Do you know what I might be able to do to make LibreOffice
execute the line in question? The queries I tried did not
execute the line, and I confess that I did not persist
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 16:14 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:32 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
(snip)
This table is described in bug
34309 error on importing a timestamp field from db2 via
ODBC https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34309
Greetings,
I am asking here about a couple of raised assertions and a
failed database query. Maybe there is a connection, but
maybe not.
My system is ubuntu-natty (11.04), and I did a build with
configuration parameters
--disable-mozilla --enable-symbols --enable-dbgutil
libs-core/connectivity/source/drivers/odbcbase/OResultSet.cxx
has a line which raises my suspicions.
Looking for references to m_pRowStatusArray, I see
(*) two instances of array new,
(*) one instance of array delete, and
(*) an instance of scalar delete in
OResultSet::setFetchSize(sal_Int32)
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:02 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 20:46 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
(snip)
Will the smoketest survive a raised assertion?
Hmm, it depends. In indeed might be failing on a debug-only assertion. I
do run it in --enable-dbgutil mode
Greetings,
I configured with options
--disable-mozilla
--enable-symbols
--enable-debug
--enable-dbgutil
--enable-crashdump
--without-junit
and `make` seemed to complete normally, although I did notice
warnings going by.
Now, `make dev-install` or
201 - 286 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
