Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#21).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#20).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#16).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#17).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#18).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#19).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#12).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
are those OUString(buf.getStr()) necessary? I think it's working as
it was before :)
See sax/qa/cppunit/test_converter.cxx (afaik it's only in this file):
-SAL_INFO(sax.cppunit, buf.getStr());
+SAL_INFO(sax.cppunit,
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#13).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#14).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#15).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#11).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 22:40 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:52 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
I almost completed the conversion of the Delete Contents
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:52 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
I almost completed the conversion of the Delete Contents dialog in
Calc (see patch #1)
What's missing from your patch is the .ui file itself, do a git
add /path/to/that/file.ui and git commit --amend
What I didn't manage to do was
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:52 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
I almost completed the conversion of the Delete Contents dialog in
Calc (see patch #1)
What's missing from your patch is the .ui file itself, do a git
Hi Caolán,
Thanks for your excellent tutorial on WidgetLayout conversion:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/WidgetLayout#HOWTO:_Step_by_step_dialog_conversion
With the help of this I almost completed the conversion of the Delete
Contents dialog in Calc (see patch #1)
What I didn't
Correction, the second reference is:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/ui/view/cellsh1.cxx#362
/Albert
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Albert Thuswaldner
albert.thuswald...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Caolán,
Thanks for your excellent tutorial on WidgetLayout conversion:
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2944
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/44/2944/1
wip
Change-Id: I23427e1e3bfb583ef10123577ebec76af617f917
---
M vcl/inc/vcl/bitmap.hxx
M
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#10).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2144
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/44/2144/1
WiP: Remove the need to manually register libs in scp2
- we have all the needed information in gbuild
- reduce
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1343
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/43/1343/1
WIP fdo#56124 add IFERROR and IFNA to calc
Change-Id: If0145363ed7495a6633d80dabbbfac30af9a0301
---
M
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1207
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/07/1207/1
WIP: move base check for bibliography to sfx2
- in the libbiblio component the frame is already created, and a
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1071
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/71/1071/1
WIP: template pack installer
- so this adds a button to the templates dialog to install
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/893
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/93/893/1
WIP: first stab at converting the insert-row dialog
to UI format
Change-Id:
HI Marcus,
Sorry for not replying until now. Forgot to CC the list again...
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Markus Mohrhard
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey Albert,
I already had a quick look at the closing problem and it seems it is
not a crash. It looks more like a missing close
Hey Albert,
Thanks a lot for this amazing work. I added it to the 3.6 release notes page.
I added a reference to the bug and a screenshot to the release notes.
Great. The screenshot looks really good.
I have a few things lined up which I want to do next. For instance, do
you mind if I
Hey Albert,
I already had a quick look at the closing problem and it seems it is
not a crash. It looks more like a missing close handler which results
in the parent window being closed which is in this case the LibO
window but I need to spend some more time on it. I will spend next
week on
Hey Albert,
2012/5/24 Albert Thuswaldner albert.thuswald...@gmail.com:
Hi Andras,
Thanks for taking your time to reply.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Albert,
2012/5/18 Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com:
This one is quite simple. we
Hi Andras,
Thanks for taking your time to reply.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Albert,
2012/5/18 Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com:
This one is quite simple. we need to move the identifiers out of the 0
to 255 range.
Andras, do you
Hi Albert,
2012/5/18 Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com:
This one is quite simple. we need to move the identifiers out of the 0
to 255 range.
Andras, do you have an idea what range is useable in sc for this? I
think most of the 256 to 999 range is already used but I have no idea
Hi Markus,
Forgot to CC the list in my previous mail, sorry for the noise.
The patch in the last mail was also wrong.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Markus Mohrhard
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Albert,
Sorry that it took me a bit to review your patch but my master trees
are
Hi Marcus,
Here is an updated patch which I hope you have time to review. I'm
sure that there are things that can be done differently, but basically
the patch works.
I have found two problems myself that I need help resolving:
1.) Compile time waring about resources ids. There is probably a
Servus Markus,
Just an update on what I've been doing on this.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Markus Mohrhard
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote:
So far so good I think, then comes the ugly bits:
1.) Obviously I'm using the wrong widget class for ScSortKeyDlg since
each dialog opens in a
Hey Albert,
So I have hacked a bit on the UI for the new sort dialog in calc. I'm
posting my work-in-progress patch hoping to get confirmation that I'm
on the right track and also help with the specific issues below.
As you suggested I've used the same concept for as in namedlg, where I
Hi Markus,
So I have hacked a bit on the UI for the new sort dialog in calc. I'm
posting my work-in-progress patch hoping to get confirmation that I'm
on the right track and also help with the specific issues below.
As you suggested I've used the same concept for as in namedlg, where I
created
Hey Michael,
thanks for looking into this.
my fix actually tried to do this for one of them, but i've noticed that
in table3.cxx there is code that hard-codes sorting related arrays to
size 3, which crashes when you add back the code that i've commented
out; at that point i thought this
On 24/03/12 01:26, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Hi Markus,
Thanks for your review.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:14, Markus Mohrhard
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok. So as promised I reviewed the patch now. Sadly there are some more
problems than I thought after my first quick look:
Hi Markus,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:36, Markus Mohrhard
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote:
And had to revert it immediately. We can use initializer lists because
older gcc versions don't know this feature. I got spammed by nearly
every of our tinderbox. I tried to fix them but the whole
Hello Albert,
sorry that it took me some time but I had a long fight with our chart
interpolation algorithm and was not able to update my tree for more
than a week.
- ScSortDescriptor::FillSortParam looks like there might happen some
index out of bounds access
So I have updated the patch
Hey Albert,
I will check this patch tomorrow. A quick look through the patch did
not show any serious problems only some small nit-picks that I will
change while reviewing.
Ok. So as promised I reviewed the patch now. Sadly there are some more
problems than I thought after my first quick
Hey Albert,
2012/3/20 Albert Thuswaldner albert.thuswald...@gmail.com:
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:27, Markus Mohrhard
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Albert,
I have a simple idea that shouldn't be too complex to implement. I
think we can agree that only the sort
Hello Albert,
2012/3/15 Albert Thuswaldner albert.thuswald...@gmail.com:
Hi Markus,
So I have hacked on this a bit, progress has been slow, detours and so
on. Anyhow, I think have now completed the step 1, i.e changed the
underlying code removing the static limit. I've have tried to keep
Hi Albert,
Then you are a lot further then I am. I'll leave you to it. Please state
in the ticket when you are working on it. That way nobody will work on
the ticket when you are busy with it.
Greetings,
Rob Snelders
On 28-05-11 21:46, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sat, May 28,
Hi Rob,
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:01, Rob Snelders programm...@ertai.nl wrote:
Hi Albert,
I have worked on this bug before I heard that you had already worked on it.
Did you work any further on it? Maybe we can callaborate on it?
Oh, how far did you come? I think I basically have done most
Hi Albert,
I have worked on this bug before I heard that you had already worked on
it. Did you work any further on it? Maybe we can callaborate on it?
I have found the place where the number of sheets is set. This is in
Hi Kohei,
Thanks for your help.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 21:19, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 17:09 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Dear List,
As a first attempt to contribute some code to LO, I've started hacking
on his:
Hi again,
In case my original email got stuck in peoples spam filter (I
accidentally managed to send it as a HTML mail) here it is again.
If it still went through, sorry for spamming the list.
Regards,
/Albert
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 17:09, Albert Thuswaldner
albert.thuswald...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 17:09 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Dear List,
As a first attempt to contribute some code to LO, I've started hacking
on his:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
I think I have come quite far with implementing the changes to the
configuration
Dear List,
As a first attempt to contribute some code to LO, I've started hacking on
his:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
I think I have come quite far with implementing the changes to the
configuration dialog (see the patch). Here there is still some things to do,
like
shell part pushed.
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been
deleted. Everything builds allright.
Part 1 --
Pushed the linguistic part.
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been
deleted. Everything builds allright.
Part 1 --
Hi,
pushed the framework part. Again a lot of files changed their place so
it was quite a lot of work to apply the patch. Additionally I removed
lots of dates, comments above removed commented methods, {} not needed
anymore after the if () has gone and changed
if ( bState = sal_True) to if
Hi,
formula and sfx2 pushed. The files WriterHelper.java and
DocumentMetadataAccess.java changed their place in the code tree but
DocumentMetaData.java seems to have been removed.
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been deleted.
Everything builds allright.
Part 1 --
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1274885/removed-commented-code-part1.tar.gz
I'll post the second part soon
Greetings
2011/3/18 Christina Roßmanith
Hi list,
Attached is a patch that improves Writer page as described in
fdo#31251[1]. After a quick poll on various LibreOffice user it appears
that a halo on the four borders is confusing so we have a smooth shadow
on two borders.
There are still some little glitches and book mode is not fully
55 matches
Mail list logo
