> On 29 Jan 2016, at 3:29 AM, Markus Mohrhard
> wrote:
>
> Hey Giuseppe,
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Giuseppe Castagno
> mailto:giuseppe.casta...@acca-esse.eu>>
> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 01/28/2016 02:15 AM, Chris Sherlock wrote:
> This is pretty cool :-)
>
> I’ve currently got
Hey Giuseppe,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Giuseppe Castagno <
giuseppe.casta...@acca-esse.eu> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 01/28/2016 02:15 AM, Chris Sherlock wrote:
>
>> This is pretty cool :-)
>>
>> I’ve currently got an odd issue with Calc not detecting the
>> content-encoding via the WebDAV
> I was thinking about having VM, each of one with it's own server,eg. Apache
> WebDAV, Alfresco, Windows 7 Profession WebDAV, eXo Platform
Using a vm, would mean it would a special test, which would not be part of
standard testing.
Is it not possible to make a set of test, that can be (optio
Hi Chris,
On 01/28/2016 02:15 AM, Chris Sherlock wrote:
This is pretty cool :-)
I’ve currently got an odd issue with Calc not detecting the content-encoding
via the WebDAV layer in bug 95217 -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95217 - Persian test in a
webpage encoded as UT
This is pretty cool :-)
I’ve currently got an odd issue with Calc not detecting the content-encoding
via the WebDAV layer in bug 95217 -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95217 - Persian test in a
webpage encoded as UTF-8 is corrupting.
Is it worthwhile having an optional com
Hi all,
after the first very trivial test on WebDAV provider, I would like to
implement the 'real' unit tests with a server.
The reason is obvious: in the end is with an external server that
ucp.webdav will interact.
This will permit to stimulate all the three layers the provider has
(roug