Re: master start a JRE 7 even if the default JRE is 6

2013-05-10 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 05/09/2013 08:06 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Le 08/05/2013 11:22, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : On 05/06/2013 07:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: What is weird, is that my default Java is Java 6 and LO is configured to use Java 6. I have both OpenJDK 6 and OpenJDK 7 on my PC. LO is

Re: master start a JRE 7 even if the default JRE is 6

2013-05-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi Stephan, Le 08/05/2013 11:22, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : On 05/06/2013 07:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: What is weird, is that my default Java is Java 6 and LO is configured to use Java 6. I have both OpenJDK 6 and OpenJDK 7 on my PC. LO is configured to use Java 6: for building

Re: master start a JRE 7 even if the default JRE is 6

2013-05-08 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 05/06/2013 07:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: What is weird, is that my default Java is Java 6 and LO is configured to use Java 6. I have both OpenJDK 6 and OpenJDK 7 on my PC. LO is configured to use Java 6: for building (i.e., as a switch in your autogen.input) or at runtime (i.e., at

Re: master start a JRE 7 even if the default JRE is 6

2013-05-08 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Is it a good idea to support java 6 both jre and jdk as those have been end of lifed, in terms of security patches etc? On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.comwrote: On 05/06/2013 07:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: What is weird, is that my default Java is

master start a JRE 7 even if the default JRE is 6

2013-05-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, As I worked on a memory leak (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64237), I added the following command in the script I use to launch LO 4.1 : ulimit -S -v 200 The idea was to make LO crash before it has eaten all the available memory. I tried several values and for 2GB, I got