On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 23:03 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> I'd rather like to see a value (SAL_MAX_INT32-1) as replacement and name
> it SAL_MAX_STRING
FWIW, writer has a TXTNODE_MAX which is currently STRING_LEN - 2;
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Li
Hi Caolán,
On Thursday, 2013-11-28 16:02:06 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Do we want to return -1 or SAL_MAX_INT32 as the
> replacement. -1 is "nice" but there is so much code in existence that
> expects the error/boundary condition return value to be > any valid
> number that I reckon SAL_MAX_
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:02:06 +
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> So now UniString is gone we have the chance to make use of OUString for
> >= 64k paragraphs (#i17171#) but we basically have to decide what to do
> with places that currently return STRING_LEN/STRING_MAXLEN in xub_Strlen
> (unsigned shor
So now UniString is gone we have the chance to make use of OUString for
>= 64k paragraphs (#i17171#) but we basically have to decide what to do
with places that currently return STRING_LEN/STRING_MAXLEN in xub_Strlen
(unsigned short). Do we want to return -1 or SAL_MAX_INT32 as the
replacement. -1
