On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 01:30 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
as well. It was the vim one at the bottom I was interested in. I don't
think (though I'm open to correction) that emacs reads mode lines unless
they are the start of the file, so those lines don't do anything.
See
Hi Prashant,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 22:36 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
These are patches to writer tree
This is some great work :-) the code starts to look much less
cluttered, thanks for that !
As Norbert says - making the mailing-list look less cluttered by
merging many patches
Hi Prashant
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 21:21 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
Do we have any official coding style ? I see a lot of messy code :)
No, there is no coding style yet, but we will start to work on one soon
(step by step).
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 09:51 -0700, Kayo Hamid wrote:
There are other places than writer, base, calc and impress repo? I'm
not familiar with these many git repositories.
All the git repos are in the clone folder.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
No, there is no coding style yet, but we will start to work on one soon
Well, much (most?) of the existing code, inherited from OpenOffice.org, clearly
uses some amount of consistent style conventions, and when editing such files,
one should, IMHO, follow the style of the surrounding code.
Hi Ruben,
Thanks for hacking LibreOffice and thanks for the patch, it's mostly
committed,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 13:10 +0200, Rubén Jáñez wrote:
This patch removes bogus comments found in Base.
just be careful of removing any comment that reference openoffice
issuezilla bugs ( there is useful
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Noel Power nopo...@novell.com wrote:
Hi Ruben,
Thanks for hacking LibreOffice and thanks for the patch, it's mostly
committed,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 13:10 +0200, Rubén Jáñez wrote:
This patch removes bogus comments found in Base.
just be careful of removing
Hi Alan
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 15:29 -0700, Alan Du wrote:
I've deleted some pointless comments in two files here. The git diff
is attached
Contributed under LGPLv3+
Thanks for the patch but what is the full path to the files the patch is
addressing?, for the life of me I can't find any module
Donald Johnson wrote:
The README file in en-US/readmes from the 3.3.0 64-bit download is a tad
annoying. First, there's no line wrap to 80 col (good for terminals).
Second,
smart quotes are in the file, which appear badly on a terminal and many text
editors. Attached are three patches to
Caolán McNamara wrote:
Aha, what it boils down to, right, is that the emacs mode lines in that
sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8atr.cxx and friends won't be used by emacs
seeing as its neither pattern.
So let's remove them - added to the list of EasyHack topics.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
HI
experiencing the same error
... LibreOffice/***/gid_Starregistry_Services_Rdb_servicesrdb ...
here is some detail
http://libreoffice.pastebin.com/zRVRZEx8
There seems to be a problem with the installer on e.g. Ubuntu for python
I confirm i'm under ubuntu Lucid
components. As a
some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
Howdy. I was asked to post a message here to kick off a discussion of
test script coordination. I'm volunteering to help with them because a)
it's simple, and b) I'm simple.
I know shell, as you can see from the add-modelines script I just
submitted, and I'm
Noel Power wrote:
who should update
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
but, should it be updated ?
This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
different situation ) Unfortunately I don't have the answer. As I see it
issuezilla is Oracles bug
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
No, there is no coding style yet, but we will start to work on
one soon
Well, much (most?) of the existing code, inherited from
OpenOffice.org, clearly uses some amount of consistent style
conventions, and when editing such files, one should, IMHO, follow
the style
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:44 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
who should update
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
but, should it be updated ?
This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
different situation ) Unfortunately I
Noel Power wrote:
who should update
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112563
but, should it be updated ?
This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
different situation ) Unfortunately I don't have the answer. As I see it
issuezilla is Oracles bug
On 2010-10-11, Noel Power wrote:
This is an excellent question ( and one I have asked myself about a
different situation ) Unfortunately I don't have the answer. As I see it
issuezilla is Oracles bug reporting infrastructure ( and not the
communities ) Also updating the issue to say it is
Hi Jesse,
On 2010-10-09 at 14:02 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
Freenode IRC bot for queries?
IIRC Christian has an IRC bot for IssueZilla, the OpenOffice.org
bugtracker, maybe you can help him to extend it for the freedesktop.org
queries too?
Christian - anything Jesse can you help
Hi Jesse, Petr, all,
On 2010-10-11 at 14:33 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Howdy. I was asked to post a message here to kick off a discussion of
test script coordination. I'm volunteering to help with them because a)
it's simple, and b) I'm simple.
I know shell, as you can see from
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:58 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
I guess a comment with. fixed in LibreOffice commit:
CGIT URI
should not be perceived as a dirty trick. Rather it points OOo
developers to a possible solution that they can use for inspiration of
how to fix a bug.
I am just
Hi,
again a brief summary of what happened the 2nd week on LibreOffice
repos:
bugfixes-week-40.txt all commits that reference a proper bug
id (from a variety of trackers - #i... referring to the OpenOffice
issuezilla, fdo# to freedesktop, rhbz# to RedHat bugzilla etc)
commit-log-week-40.txt
i'm trying to build libreoffice, at windows, but i do not known what i need.
i'm following this page,
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide/Building_on_Windows,
and I have in my files the build, base, impress, writer and calc repos. cygwin
+ dependencies, perl +
Le 10/10/2010 22:31, julien a écrit :
Le 10/10/2010 16:33, julien a écrit :
Hi,
I've just done these steps :
make clean
git pull -r
bni/g pull -r
./autogen.sh --with-git (i removed --disable-kde --disable-kde4 just
to test if kde parts are ok, of course i installed kdelibs4-dev
./download
Canadian HealthCare http://yonnefhou.com/
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 16:16 -0700, Alan Du wrote:
Sorry about my last whacked email. I've removed a lot of
the //CHINA001 comments with these.
The filename is the directory the changes were made in.
Hey Alan,
Thanks for your patch submission. I've pushed most of it except for the
writer
Hi,
Mechtilde thankfully reported a problem with old OOo 2.x user
installations, which get migrated over to LibreOffice automatically
- problem is, the OOo code we inherit here has several bugs.
So we talked a bit on IRC tonight, and we somehow figured it would
be a good idea to keep migrating
Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
acquainted with the build and with git...
This is quite fresh in my mind... since I've learn that in the past
few days. But I may be wrong, so a reviewed by more
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:43 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
acquainted with the build and with git...
This is quite fresh in my mind... since
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:10 -0700, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:43 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud
nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
acquainted with
29 matches
Mail list logo
