Le 2011-01-30 13:53, drew a écrit :
Hi,
Received a message from a user today regarding the install instructions
within the en_US readme file covering Mandriva:
'Doing commands like su urpmi *.rpm won't work; it either has to be
sudo urpmi *.rpm or su -c urpmi *.rpm'
I have never used Mandriva
Le 2011-01-31 03:08, Marc Paré a écrit :
Here's another routine I am suggesting for the Konsole challenged users
(Mandriva):
1. Download the distro and help files and language pack (if needed).
2. Right click on the .tar.gz and choose extract here
3. You can put/move ALL the .rpms that you
* Arno Teigseth arnot...@gmail.com schrieb:
- no one wants to make such a system just for libreoffice
- it's more work figuring out the problems that probably will arise from
an upgrade package than actually just installing the newer version of
openoffice.
These would probably be good
2011/1/31 ski libreoff...@mail.ru:
Hi!
Is there any possibility to build the LibreOffice under the FreeBSD?
Now I get this error:
I am currently writing a ports for libreoffice, it should hit the
ports tree this week (my be next week depending on the testing) it
builds and run fine, I just
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 03:50:37PM +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
Hi
In our effort of replacing deprecated data types from tools/ by std::
types we would like to use gprof for profiling (to choose the right
data types). But unfortunately, we don't know to set the -pg flag,
export
Hi,
does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely.
-Thomas
From dfe6fbe864926c8ef29c34681b0425f7aacdca75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:52:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove DBG_TRACE_BASIC, DBG_SAVE_DISASSEMBLY and sbtrace.hxx
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:22 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:59 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
I'm still translating comments and came across a constant named
SCID_NEWDOCUMENT. When I asked opengrok the only place where this
constant was found was the file rechead.hxx
Hi David,
Thanks for your review!
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:16:13 +0100, David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
-// OD 09.01.2003 #i6467# - adjust view shell option to the same as for
print
+// adjust view shell option to the same as for print
We generally want to leave the
Hi Alfonso,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 15:10 +, Alfonso Eusebio wrote:
Hi,
I've been going through the list of identified unused functions in calc and
commenting out those that don't seem to be used anywhere.
Why don't you simply remove them and check if it still builds?
Regards,
--
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 20:05 -0400, Clio wrote:
added Russian translation to dictionaries/ru_RU/description.xml
Many thanks for your patch, I just pushed it.
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
Hi Jean,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 13:55 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
No the problem is not there. It is in the long list of useless
extensions / dictionaries in the Extensions Manager.
Many users are afraid when they see this list.
Ah ! :-) so - this is something else.
We
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 17:12 +0100, Tobias Rosenberger wrote:
I translated the German comments in the libs-core repo in connectivity/inc/.
Changes are available under LGPLv3+/MPL.
Thanks for these, all pushed now. Attachments are easier to work with
than inline patches FWIW.
C.
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 20:08 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:50 +0100, xapantu wrote:
Here is a patch to remove the menu when the alt key is pressed, it is
not the case with GTK apps, and is disturbing.
This will also work around the rather horrific hack that totem
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 04:22 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
under LGPLv3+ / MPL.
Pushed, but please pay attention to:
* Avoid breaking the build with ill-formed comments
* Provide several patches changing twice the same things in the same
files but not 100% exactly in the same way. I had to
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:54 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote:
Hello,
here's another patch.
This one is also related with bogus comments.
Pushed as well
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr
Hello Antoine,
Thanks for your patch. I just pushed it. Feel free to provide other
patches like this one.
BTW, you didn't mention anything, I supposed you were agreeing to
provide the patch under LGPLv3+ / MPL... is that OK?
Regards,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
Hello Kurosawa-san,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 16:53 +0900, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote:
Hi,
I found some unused files in libs-gui/sv-tools/ and filters/binfilter/.
Actually they are not compiled.
Attached patches remove them.
Many thanks for your patches. I just pushed them. I compiled them and it
Hello Soeren and Thies,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 18:04 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
Now we have replaced tools/list with std::list in ScAddInListener,
here we used a list, as there is adding, removing, and searching on
this list, and no clear way to sort the elements. The patch comes in
three
Hi all,
This is beautiful!
http://www.techdrivein.com/2011/01/impressive-libreoffice-ui-mockups-you.html
LibreOffice will be the best office suite ever seen! :-)
Regards,
Júlio.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Absolutely fantastic!
Brilliant use of all this wasted space in a wide screen while writing in a
portrait page!
This just makes me think how the MS innovative big fat ribbon on top was
wasting valuable screen space.
Congratulations to whoever had this brilliant idea.
I hope it is implemented
Hi all,
Hi all,
This is beautiful!
http://www.techdrivein.com/2011/01/impressive-libreoffice-ui-mockups-you.html
LibreOffice will be the best office suite ever seen! :-)
just FYI:
Paulo is already part of our Design Team :-)
He created the detailed 256px versions (and an updated 128px
Dear Julio,
this is the development mailing list. Please discuss and post this
on other lists, such as discuss@ or marketing@
thanks,
Charles.
Le Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:57:44 -0300,
Júlio Hoffimann julio.hoffim...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi all,
This is beautiful!
Hi Caolan,
Any chance you could review Petr Gajdos's attached patch; AFAIR you are
a bit of a fontconfig wizard ;-) It is to fix this:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379991
Thanks ! :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com ,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:11 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
No, simply state the depencies and let the distros handle the rest.
For old legacy systems, simply create an own micro-distro.
Luckily we have a micro-distro now; complete with our own build system,
and method of packaging; it is
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:44 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out the autogen.sh stuff and make it use the
correct paths for libraries; one of the errors I got is really freaking
me out:
:-)
Why would LO need to build it own version of Mozilla/Seamonkey !?
Hi Christina,
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:25 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote:
and how could I find out if a constant like SCID_NEWDOCUMENT is still
referenced? Or does that require some more experience with the code base?
In general running 'g grep' in the top-level is reliable;
Yes. LGPLv3+ and MPL as usual.
Christina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Sorry Charles, this will not happen again. ;-)
Regards,
Júlio.
2011/1/31 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
Dear Julio,
this is the development mailing list. Please discuss and post this
on other lists, such as discuss@ or marketing@
thanks,
Charles.
Le Mon, 31
Thanks.
On 01/31/2011 12:32 PM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:58 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
does anyone need this macros? I removed them completely.
I just pushed your patch here:
Hi there,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 00:28 +0100, Guillaume wrote:
Hi, I removed some empty lines in few files for my first patch.
I'll continue if it's ok.
It seems someone pushed this before I could :-) anyhow - thanks again;
and can you confirm you're ok with the LGPLv3+/MPL dual license
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:30 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
and xml security foo - AFAIR the cert management
stuff in moz really needs pushing down to NSS, or splitting out.
IIRC the real stuff that xmlsecurity needs is all in NSS, while the only
bit that xmlsecurity needs from MOZ is simply to
Hi Tobias,
On 2011-01-30 at 20:56 +0100, Tobias Rosenberger wrote:
is there a reason why you don't use git submodule for managing the
other repos in the build repo?
The reason is that so far nobody researched that enough, to be able to
judge if it would help us, or not :-) From what I know
31.01.2011 06:17, Cedric Bosdonnat пишет:
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 20:05 -0400, Clio wrote:
added Russian translation to dictionaries/ru_RU/description.xml
Well I forgot to ask you... do you agree to push the patch under LGPLv3+
and MPL?
Yes, of course.
Thank you.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On 2011-01-30 at 20:56 +0100, Tobias Rosenberger wrote:
is there a reason why you don't use git submodule for managing the
other repos in the build repo?
The reason is that so far nobody researched that enough,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 14:38 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:30 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
and xml security foo - AFAIR the cert management
stuff in moz really needs pushing down to NSS, or splitting out.
IIRC the real stuff that xmlsecurity needs is all in NSS,
2011/1/31 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com:
Heh; could you submit the patches to the list (with suitable LGPLv3+ /
MPL license (if you're ok with that).
If you could glup the clean ones together into one patch: soffice.sh,
ooinstall, build-ooo can go in as-is; the others
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 12:46 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
It was a low-hanging fruit; I'll collect patches locally for a while
until I can get a more complete build.
..
Sure.
Great :-) thanks.
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ says LO is licensed
under both LGPLv3
Hi Michael,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 18:24 +, Michael Florian Schönitzer wrote:
Hey, I have found a strange bug. I don't know where there is the right
place, so I put it here.
Thanks !
- Opening it in LibreOffice 3.3 under Windows, the window beeing maximized
= Empty Document,
Sure; so if we look at:
setup_native/source/win32/customactions/shellextensions/registerextension.cxx
It -looks- to me, as if we should duplicate / implement a new extension
Er, no need to implement a new shell extension. What could be done is to
implement a new installer
Hi Jesus,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 15:09 +0100, Jesús Corrius wrote:
Could someone please review and cherry-pick for libreoffice-3-3 branch
this commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=affa15b894b66b3d12d00ab1ad3c567ade88800e
Quick sanity check, and pushed it;
Hi Andras,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 15:13 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
Please review them and cherry-pick to libreoffice-3-3.
Thanks ! I read all the integration points, and everything look great
to me :-) [ though I can't say I read all of the dictionaries fully ;-].
Any chance you
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:18 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Or to some other project, dedicated to generic Windows packaging.
(cygwin folks already have done a lot in this area, so that'd
be a good starting point).
Aha I didn't know that existed. As long as the user experience isn't
deteriorated
Hi there,
The appended should save us ~10Mb of install size on Windows (and
perhaps elsewhere too) - I'd love to get it onto the libreoffice-3-3
branch.
Thanks,
Michael.
diff --git a/distro-configs/LibreOfficeLinux.conf.in
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Dave Dumaresq dfdumar...@gmail.com wrote:
Has there been any resolution to this?
I bisected the problem to
libs-gui:ef70418ebf8b32f2d10abce61c0aa2c1011ced14
I'll let Joe decide how best revert/fix (since there may be more than
one commit involved to revert
Hi all,
Here are the first patch for freebsd support :
I splitted them corresponding to the different git and prefix them
with the git repository name.
Of course those patches are in any license you want that best fits your needs :)
The other patch are not included as they need more work, and I
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:05 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
Has there been any resolution to this?
Yes ! Norbert just finished an amazing binary chop that brought it back
to commit:
libs-gui:ef70418ebf8b32f2d10abce61c0aa2c1011ced14 (a remove DECLARE_LIST
in rsc)
Which
Hi,
I'm not really sure about this.
There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice
copyright notes. They could be removed, could they?
-Thomas
From b93f098328afb2cf3ad420bfef45dacbdd7d5181 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011
Thanks for the update!
Dave
On 31-Jan-11, at 9:55 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:05 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
Has there been any resolution to this?
Yes ! Norbert just finished an amazing binary chop that brought it
back
to commit:
Hi,
this time a brief summary of what happened during the 4th week in 2011
on LibreOffice repositories and the living branches:
+ master:hot LO-3.4 development
+ libreoffice-3-3: fixes for next LO-3.3.x bug fix release[*]
There are two logs for each branch:
ie. which piece of existing code do we base this on, and where is it ?
Well, the sellang custom action is pretty minimal, and is written in very
C-like fashion (as it was I that wrote it, many years ago;). A single entry
point: SelectLanguage which is called from msiexec when running the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:27:07PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Francois: I expect you to google Tor Lillqvist, and think a bit more
before typing.
I'm sure Tor is a nice fellow; I'm sorry if some of my mails seemed rude,
that was not my intent.
this does not
mean it is worthless having
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Steven Butler sebut...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the existing indexing code use LibreOffice libraries? In that case it
is best to keep it as a separate program which is always installed, and just
have the custom action run it as a separate process (after putting
Hi Baptiste,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 18:49 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Here are the first patch for freebsd support :
Great; thanks pushed them all.
Of course those patches are in any license you want that best fits your needs
:)
I'll take that as LGPLv3+/MPL ;-)
The
We can always hide the cmd window, it's easy ;)
You mean *console* window. No cmd.exe involved when running a console exe
from a gui exe (unless it is specifically cmd.exe that you run), even if a
console window shows up. And indeed, it is trivial to build the program to be
run as a gui exe
I can answer this quickly. The index code is now in git in
dictionaries/source/idxdict.cpp. It is very simple and uses only STL
and libstdc++ (in my recollection).
OK, so on Windows it then uses the stlport library shipped with LO (if at all;
I guess it also is possible that all STL code it
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
We can always hide the cmd window, it's easy ;)
You mean *console* window. No cmd.exe involved when running a console exe
from a gui exe (unless it is specifically cmd.exe that you run), even if a
console window
On 1 February 2011 06:19, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
OK, so on Windows it then uses the stlport library shipped with LO (if at
all; I guess it also is possible that all STL code it uses comes from
headers?)
On Windows why can it not use the native STL available there? Is it
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 15:17 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 21:45 +1000, Steve Butler wrote:
If the thesaurus is only loaded when the user pops it up, then
couldn't mythes be taught to generate its own in-memory index
from the dictionary and not bother with an
Hi Michael
On 1 February 2011 01:17, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Sure - so; in response to user input I suspect we can take a second to
parse the thesaurus; we have around 20Mb of text to load for en_US;
perhaps 32Mb is a reasonable upper-bound; it does
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:21 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
Thanks for the update!
Just pushed a fix; the unfortunate random re-use of poorly scoped local
variables made this hard to see in the patch. IMHO we need to be locally
scoping all variables as tightly as possible when we
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:20 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice
copyright notes. They could be removed, could they?
Heh, probably not. In this case what you could do I guess is to file a
bug against the inheritors of the
On 1 February 2011 06:30, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
FWIW, I'm sure Nemeth would be interested if you e.g. wanted to create a
reimpl of mythes that was faster than the original and perhaps simply
designate the optimized version the new mythes version with an API/ABI
change :-)
I do not have much time right now. So the comments in the file are not
all translated yet.
But every litte bit helps, right? :)
Pascal
From 6333f7553cac1fc558a5db66ca588a45af85eea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pascal Ullrich tentl...@web.de
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:38:55 +0100
Subject:
On 31 January 2011 23:14, Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@novell.com wrote:
(Hmm, was this message intentionally not to the list?)
An accident, list ccd.
So after looking at the wiki I wasn't able to find any instructions on
how one would go about building the Windows installer. Are the
Hi all,
this mail announces the second step of our official Design Team
Kick-Off. It is about what we've done so far, and how we did it - thus,
it aims to get everybody on track who is interested to join, or to
collaborate.
Current Status of Work and Collaboration:
Ok, I wondered because this copyright notice is only inside two files of
hwpfilter. But you're right, they have to the rights on it.
-Thomas
On 01/31/2011 07:30 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On 1/31/11, Thomas Arnhold tho...@arnhold.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm not really sure about this.
There are
Thanks. Filed a bug #33782.
-Thomas
On 01/31/2011 09:44 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 19:20 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
There are some files lying around with StarDivision or StarOffice
copyright notes. They could be removed, could they?
Heh, probably not. In this case
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:21 -0800, Dave Dumaresq wrote:
Thanks for the update!
Just pushed a fix; the unfortunate random re-use of poorly scoped local
variables made this hard to see in the patch.
On 31/01/11 00:32, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Little bit trickier when putting on a ISV hat and trying to target
all Linux distros
One binpkg for all distros ?! The whole idea of this is stupid.
Some of my customers didn't listen to me and tried that at any
cost, they failed miserably. I haven't
Hi Soeren,
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 22:33 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote:
Hi
Here five patches cleaning up in dpsave.hxx/.cxx in sc
0001: replacing tools/solar.h data types by sal data types
0002: cleaning up spacings
0003-0005: replacing String with OUString in the three classes, and
changing
Hullo List (Norbert),
I've finally found some time to get back to LO dev (yay!). But only for
about 10 minutes (boo!). I've checked out the gnumake2.1 branch and
made things the usual way: a successful build.
When I execute make with USE_GMAKE=1, however, I'm getting lots of
'chmod:
Hi,
Currently Save as Picture feature in Writer, Impress, or Draw
produces a broken EPS file when I save an image as EPS format.
# Export feature produces a correct file.
Here is a patch to fix this issue.
The patch is under the LGPLv3+ / MPL.
Cheers,
--
KUROSAWA Takeshi taken@gmail.com
the safest way is:
make clean
./g pull -r (optional. if you want to get the very latest)
./autogen.sh (it automatically re-use the last parameters you used -
see autogen.lastrun)
make
Norbert
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:39 PM, David Dumaresq dfdumar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
what is the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Kevin Hunter hunt...@earlham.edu wrote:
Hullo List (Norbert),
I've finally found some time to get back to LO dev (yay!). But only for
about 10 minutes (boo!). I've checked out the gnumake2.1 branch and made
things the usual way: a successful build.
When I
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Kenneth Venken
kenneth.ven...@gmail.com wrote:
I think i've implemented all the suggestions. There's one hard coded limit
(i 0x1FFF) i don't get. Why isn't it 0x2000 since existMark has a size of
0x1. I changed it to i 0x2000. This will not have an
Le 31/01/2011 11:15, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hi Jean,
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 13:55 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
No the problem is not there. It is in the long list of useless
extensions / dictionaries in the Extensions Manager.
Many users are afraid when they see this list.
Ah !
At 12:32am -0500 Tue, 01 Feb 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
This is a bug, unrelated to gnumake, that has been fixed in master
(but not picked-up in the gnumake2.1 branch) you can ignore these for
now.
Gracias.
Kevin
___
LibreOffice mailing list
77 matches
Mail list logo
