https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Telesto,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #11 from Jérôme ---
Of course in comment #10, you should read (In reply to Jérôme from comment #10)
> - and to silently set the maximum png quality.
Of course, you should read "set the maximum png force".
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
Jérôme changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #10 from Jérôme ---
In order to simplify the png related UI questions, the bug #147550 proposes :
- to hide the png compression force
- and to silently set the maximum png quality.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||117085
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
mulla.tasa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #8 from Telesto ---
(In reply to mwtjunkmail from comment #7)
> It's not about being optimal, it's about choice. Do I want my 16GB library
> of PNG files to have the fastest load rate and least compression per image,
> or for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #7 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #6)
> (In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Telesto from comment #4)
> > > There is a 'common' aspect here.. set compression high..
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #6 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #5)
> (In reply to Telesto from comment #4)
> > There is a 'common' aspect here.. set compression high.. and will usually
> > get bad quality. The but you can
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #5 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #4)
> There is a 'common' aspect here.. set compression high.. and will usually
> get bad quality. The but you can define compression based on quality or by
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #4 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> One is compression the other quality. Still NAB for me.
There is a 'common' aspect here.. set compression high.. and will usually get
bad quality. The but you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
17 matches
Mail list logo
