https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Ability to assign tracked |Ability to assign comments
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> Sometimes, you want to keep some comment in a document, but have it show as
> your own comment...
This makes not much sense to me. Pretending to be the au
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> This makes not much sense to me. Pretending to be the author of a comment
> should rather be avoided (bug 161978) or alternatively indicated clearly.
_In
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #2)
> 1. ... 6.
All good example but I still disagree about messing with meta data. If an
extension handles this, fine for me.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #2)
> All good example but I still disagree about messing with meta data.
Why is it a problem to edit the name o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #5)
> In all these cases, extending the comments text or replying to the comment
> would work just as fine
Maybe I'm missing your point? The desired outcome is a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #7 from Cor Nouws ---
Hi Eyal,
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #6)
> Maybe I'm missing your point? The desired outcome is a comment by the
> current author, and no comment by another author. Your suggestions don't
> a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #7)
> When author X simply adds a
> comment to the comment to show that, she/he's done, and there is not a
> chance of confusion over what happened with the commen
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)
> The integrity of authorship outweighs the flexibility and
> convenience. => WF
There is no integrity of authorship, Heiko. The author information (for
c
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #11 from Timur ---
Seems duplicate of bug 99698 to me, same need to change Author name.
Only, I proposed to easily change author name that is picked by future
comments, not already created comments.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162424
--- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #11)
The issues are at least related. Commenting there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
16 matches
Mail list logo