https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #30 from Hadmut Danisch ---
Hi,
thanks for providing an AppImage version.
I just had opened a (duplicate) bug to propose using AppImage and did not
realize that it is already offered, because it's not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #28 from Hans Deragon ---
Oh god. I did not read the menu completely I went directly to the 'Download
LibreOffice' menu item, as it seams so natural to do so...
The problem is with the website menu. I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #27 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Hans Deragon from comment #26)
> But how does the casual, normal user, get to this page
> (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/appimage) from the home page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #26 from Hans Deragon ---
But how does the casual, normal user, get to this page
(http://www.libreoffice.org/download/appimage) from the home page
(http://www.libreoffice.org)? If you did not posted this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #25 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Appimage has a download page on the website, but it needs some minor tweaks to
get it in order.
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/appimage/
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #24 from Hans Deragon ---
Great! Thank you very much. Any chance to have it made available on
"https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/; ? Else, how is it expected
for the casual user to find this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #22 from kurt.pfei...@gmail.com ---
Christian Lohmaier asked in comment #10:
> "Why would you need a portable version of LibreOffice for Linux?"
I'll give you my two major use cases:
1. I have more than one system, and I'm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #21 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
So Antonio Faccioli is building stable, pre-release and daily builds of
libreoffice as mentioned here -
https://twitter.com/Faccioli74/status/871654878287933443
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #18 from benbogg...@gmail.com ---
I'll adress Christian's "Why would you need a portable version of LibreOffice
for linux?"
I do because I am stuck with a certain version of a certain distribution (due
to compatibility with a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Christian Lohmaier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|cl...@documentfoundation.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #16 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #15)
> *THIS* is about portable, continuing ramblings about *OTHER* bugs won't
> change anything.
>
Both reports are closely
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #15 from Christian Lohmaier ---
*THIS* is about portable, continuing ramblings about *OTHER* bugs won't change
anything.
And you can write bullshit about "dependency problems" as much as you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #14 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #12)
> that has no relation to a portable version. You can install LO provided by
> TDF without dependency hell. If you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #13 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #10)
I see that you have not answered my question is it has nothing to say about it?
> the point is not about a linux
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #12 from Christian Lohmaier ---
that has no relation to a portable version. You can install LO provided by TDF
without dependency hell. If you already had LO, you can install update. Even if
you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #11 from Hans Deragon ---
Users want to use the latest version on Linux without requiring to go to the
terminal and try to fix dependency hell. They simply want to fetch the latest
version from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #10 from Christian Lohmaier ---
the point is not about a linux version in general, but about a portable
version. Why would you need a portable version of LibreOffice for linux?
Chanches are that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #9 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #8)
> I don't see the need for a linux portable version, as you can always just
> extract the rpms using e.g.
>
> for i in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #8 from Christian Lohmaier ---
I don't see the need for a linux portable version, as you can always just
extract the rpms using e.g.
for i in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio $i |cpio -idmv; done
and then
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #7 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #6)
> Contacted the author of appimage (
> https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/issues/63 ) and he said, "Might be
> worth
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #6 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips ---
Contacted the author of appimage (
https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/issues/63 ) and he said, "Might be worth
mentioning that the script to generate the AppImage is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #4 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #3)
> Seems this will be solved with Flatpak.
>
> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/flatpak/
Flatpak is nice and is an
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #1 from Michael Stahl ---
basically this already exists, on any GNU/Linux system you can use the
"install" script included in the RPM instset to install in any directory, no
root privileges required.
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
30 matches
Mail list logo