klaus-jürgen weghorn ol píše v So 21. 04. 2012 v 10:49 +0200:
Hi Fridrich, *,
this mail never reached the l10n@ and projects@ but only the LibO-QA. Is
there a problem with the mail-system or something else?
It is by purpose. We should probably update the subject to make it more
clear. What
Petr Mladek schrieb:
It is by purpose. We should probably update the subject to make it more
clear. What about the following?
[ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.3 RC1 builds available for pre-testing
Hi,
I believe that's a good Idea, subject for these first announcements
should be amended as
Am 24.04.2012 10:51, schrieb Pedro:
Hi Petr
The original message was sent to
LibreOfficelibreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org,
l...@global.libreoffice.org,
proje...@global.libreoffice.org,
Libreoffice-qalibreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
If it didn't reach l10n and projects, it means that
Hi,
On Tuesday 24 April 2012, 10:46:16 Petr Mladek wrote:
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol píše v So 21. 04. 2012 v 10:49 +0200:
Am 20.04.2012 12:44, schrieb Fridrich Strba:
Builds are now being uploaded to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't
spread news too widely!) place, as soon as
Hi Guys,
can we have a decision in this matter?
Do we/you need more information/ more time - or is it just different heart
feelings?
Shall we make an operational tradeoff by defining a test period of, say, one
year?
For me, the matter itself is not that important, I can arrange with both
Nino Novak píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 12:14 +0200:
Hi Guys,
can we have a decision in this matter?
So, please, for meritocratic reasons, Bjoern and Rainer, I believe it's up to
you to decide. (Or is ESC or whatever tdf Board the right gremium? I don't
know)
There is strong conflicting
Roman píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 12:14 +0200:
Am 23.04.12 12:38, schrieb Nino Novak:
in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48329 the second attachment
(help_poster.doc) has been uploaded by user mikebgx, as shown correctly in
the
entry in the Attachments section on top.
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.5.3.2 tag for 3.5.3-rc2
release. The corresponding official builds will be available within
next few days. It will be used as final if no blocker is found.
See the attached list of changes against 3.5.3-rc1.
Now, you might switch your current 3-5
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:54:23PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Nino Novak píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 12:14 +0200:
Hi Guys,
can we have a decision in this matter?
So, please, for meritocratic reasons, Bjoern and Rainer, I believe it's up
to
you to decide. (Or is ESC or whatever tdf
Hi dE,
I am happy to read this because I see a nice solution from what you
wrote.
dE . píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 10:55 +0530:
On 04/23/12 20:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
Yes, absolutely, the MAB should be in a reasonable limit such that it
looks 'solvable'.
Exactly. We need to keep the 50 or
Hi dE,
thanks for the list.
dE . píše v Ne 22. 04. 2012 v 10:50 +0530:
I suggestion addition of the following bugs -
Bug 32991 -- This's farely used in doc document, and may break the
complete formatting of the document in some cases.
Yup, it is something that we really should fix.
Bug
Nino Novak wrote:
BTW - do you have actual numbers? How many downloads do we actually have and
how many does the server allow maximally? And about how many bugs have been
reported in the 24-h-period in the past?
Hi Nino,
the announcement is to be taken project-internal, i.e. addressing
Hello,
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49115
It's a bug reporter like this that makes me lose hope in a FOSS
project such as this one.
Best,
Kohei
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
I think we could use some help dealing with an ugly personal attack
disguised as a bug report.
Hello Kohei,
I believe OfficeUser had a bad day when he wrote that lousy bad and
incomplete report with wild speculations instead of reviewable facts.
We should not attach
14 matches
Mail list logo
