Hi,
Nobody interested to test and answer?
Well, it is clear that QA peoples are not welcome in this area of the
code. :-(
JBF
Le 25/09/2012 06:58, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Now, the bottleneck fdo#54498 has been fixed for LO 3.6.2, it is a great
> step toward making LO 3.6 usa
Hi,
as already announced by Joel, the QA call has been postponed to tomorrow
1300UTC.
Here is the prototype agenda:
pending action items:
- merge 3.5 and 3.6 in one big bibisect repo (Bjoern)
- recheck and tweak bibisect details (Bjoern)
- Ping cloph if we can make that switchable to s
Hi,
there have been created the libreoffice-3.6.2.2 tag (aka rc2). The
corresponding official builds will be available within next few days.
See the attached list of changes against 3.6.2.1[*].
Now, you might switch your current 3-6 or 3-6-2 source tree to it using:
./g fetch --tags
./g checko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joel
First, thank you for handling this initiative. I really appreciate your
work on QA for LibreOffice.
Please consider fdo#53673 as hardhack
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
Our labels creation system and mail merge needs ass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andras,
I am just pragmatic... I have a pet query where I get all bugs I am
involved someway and several of them are RESOLVED-FIXED. I am suggesting
to CLOSE less than 15 bugs.
Regards
Olivier
Em 25-09-2012 04:28, Andras Timar escreveu:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
2012/9/25 Richard :
> Then our criteria are misplaced?
> If bugs are not to be CLOSED but only RESOLVED;
> then we need to change our search and triage methods?
The fact is that there are 4628 RESOLVED LibreOffice bugs in Bugzilla.
IMHO QA manpower could be used better, than to check and clos
Hi Joel --
Am 24.09.12 20:12, schrieb Joel Madero:
I am a bit concerned that our # of bugs from 2011 jumped a lot, I'm not
sure if there's a bug with FDO - before I think we had 11 bugs from
2011, now we have a lot more than that.
For some (but only for some!) of these “new” UNCONFIRMED bugs f
Hi Yi
Yi Fan Jiang wrote
>> I thought the goal of this site was for reporting the results of a
>> Regression Test.
>
> Yes, it is exactly for regression test :)
When I logged in earlier today, the two tests I had Passed weren't showing
up. Now they are. I was confused about the goals :)
Yi Fa
Hi all,
Now, the bottleneck fdo#54498 has been fixed for LO 3.6.2, it is a great
step toward making LO 3.6 usable for production !
So I think it's time for developers to consider the severe UX issue we
have with the Edit dialog from manage screen in Format -> Conditional
Formatting -> Manage.
The
