Hi,
As not regular Windows user, I hit a problem with installing 400rc2.
I use parallel installation (1)
After " msiexec /a LibreOffice_4.0.0.2_Win_x81.msi "
I can give the path, but do not have the option to choose which
extensions (e.g. language packs) will be installed.
Is that regular, e
On 01/26/2013 02:48 PM, Jack Leigh wrote:
c) a reminder + automated closing of bug after some period of time
+1 Something like automated closing after 3 months in NEEDINFO
Response: From developer side, they'll see a MASSIVE influx of emails,
pointed out by a core developer. This would need ap
c) a reminder + automated closing of bug after some period of time
+1 Something like automated closing after 3 months in NEEDINFO
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://list
Time Start: 1405UTC
Present: Peter, Florian, Joel, Joren, Thorsten
*Completed Action Items*
***Wiki for Hard Hacks – on hold until after release of 4.0 (Joel)
*Wiki page for triage contest (Joel)
*Bibisect Torrent/Mirror – No longer needed with bibisect repository
*Wiki for FDO policies/rules (Jo
Time Start: 1405 UTC
Present: Peter, Florian, Joel, Joren, Thorsten
*Completed Action Items*
***Wiki for Hard Hacks – on hold until after release of 4.0 (Joel)
*Wiki page for triage contest (Joel)
*Bibisect Torrent/Mirror – No longer needed with bibisect repository
*Wiki for FDO policies/rules (J
Hi All,
During our last QA call we came up with a plan for NEEDINFO bugs that
have been stagnant for 6+ months. I've decided to remove this from the
minutes because there are some concerns about the agreement that was
made. It was requested that we have a discussion through a thread about
wha
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Rainer Bielefeld <
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
>
> Actually, I could go a step further and change the assignee of these
>> bugs with status NEW to the default assignee to further remove
>> ambiguity,
>>
>
>
> It was the the core of my question whether
Marc Paré schrieb:
Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site?
Hi Marc,
I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl
reasons, we need a TOC with links to readme files in all available
languages and for all different public versions.
If we do not need su
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
No, those bugs were assigned to me originally by someone else, as part
of the very old workflow. I had no plan to work on them in the first
place.
Hi Kohei,
yes, you are completely right, those assignations were a legacy, and
it's a useful clearing up for those bugs t
I am trying to close this bug BUT incredibly enough this has been a
problem since 2010!!!
For some reason, there is a reference to a link in the Readme file ->
[http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme.html] that points to an
non-existing page on our site.
Like it was mentioned in 2010, Sil
Hi!
Here my first proposal for the mass changes template:
---
Dear bug submitter,
We recognized that your bug is in NEEDINFO state for an unusual long
time. This may has happened in error or, and that is more likely, we
asked for information.
If you think, that this bug doesn
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Rainer Bielefeld <
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> I see that you changed status of several bugs [1] with you as assignee
> from status ASSIGNED to NEW.
>
> My interpretation is that you are intending to do some work on it, but
> currently t
Hi Kohei,
I see that you changed status of several bugs [1] with you as assignee
from status ASSIGNED to NEW.
My interpretation is that you are intending to do some work on it, but
currently that particular Bug is far at the end of your priority list
and you are not planning activity in near
13 matches
Mail list logo
