On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:43 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> > I) Such an action should avoid collateral damages as effective as
> > possible. A promising approach might be to find an effective query with
> > good accuracy for hopeless Bug rep
Petr Mladek schrieb:
Well, I am still not persuaded that we want 2 or more strike solution.
Hi Petr,
me too! This mailing with automated personal mails is my compromise
offer. And I have little hope to get some feedback for those 1/3 real
bugs I observed in a sample before the last "Big clo
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:43 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> I) Such an action should avoid collateral damages as effective as
> possible. A promising approach might be to find an effective query with
> good accuracy for hopeless Bug reports where we can expect that there
> will be no useful rea
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 13:20 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Pedro schrieb:
>
> > I think that is extremely rude. It reminds me of my Graduation diploma
> > which was not ready for 3 years and then I received a postcard saying I had
> > 10 days to pick it up...
>
> Hi,
>
> no, we will not leave
Pedro schrieb:
I think that is extremely rude. It reminds me of my Graduation diploma
which was not ready for 3 years and then I received a postcard saying I had
10 days to pick it up...
Hi,
no, we will not leave open a pending action item for 1 month. During
that time several of the relate
Hi all
While trying to check if the import personal data is indeed fixed (see
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57061) I have come across a
daily build problem.
I downloaded a daily build from the 3.6 branch (hopefully it has the same
functionality as the released 3.6.5.2...) but was u
Petr Mladek wrote
> Some people suggested 6 months. You suggests one week. I do not persist
> on 30 days but I think that it is a good compromise.
>
> For example, imagine someone who reports a bug before leaving on
> vacation, business trip, or into hospital. In addition, I think that it
> would
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 07:51 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Petr Mladek schrieb:
>
> > IMHO, the most important is to give
> > user chance to answer before the first warning (30 days or so).
>
> Hi Petr,
>
> I don't think so. My experience is that the reporter normally will
> answer within 3 d
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 07:09 +0100, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> Am 28.01.2013 14:13, schrieb Petr Mladek:
> > > Strike 2 After 7 Days:
> > > Query for all Bugs for what mails have been sent in Strike 1:
> > > - Changed since mail (probably by reporter): QA will take care
> > > - NOT changed: Mass cl
