Petr Mladek wrote > Some people suggested 6 months. You suggests one week. I do not persist > on 30 days but I think that it is a good compromise. > > For example, imagine someone who reports a bug before leaving on > vacation, business trip, or into hospital. In addition, I think that it > would be rude to push users to provide feedback within 7 days when the > triage and fixing the bugs might take weeks and months :-)
+1 I think that is extremely rude. It reminds me of my Graduation diploma which was not ready for 3 years and then I received a postcard saying I had 10 days to pick it up... I believe that 1 month interval between the 3 strikes is the most reasonable. It doesn't leave untouched items for more than 3 months and it should overcome the "vacation, business trip, or into hospital" period. Just my 2 cents ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Stagnant-NEEDINFO-bugs-tp4032113p4032870.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
