On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:54:02 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
On 11/11/2014 10:42 PM, Tommy wrote:
my proposal is to ping:
UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 100 days
http://snipurl.com/29ejxgd (183 bugs)
I am not a fan at all for pinging unconfirmed bugs . . . already too
Hi all,
I am currently uploading the intermediate LibreOffice 4.4~alpha2 bibisect repo
to:
http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/bibisect/bibisect-44alpha2only.tar.xz
http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/bibisect/bibisect-44alpha2only.tar.xz.sig
it should be finished in ~1 hour. Note the
Ok. let's go ahead with the old NEW bugs (nice oxymoron).
I suggest waiting a few days after the incoming release of LibO 4.3.4
before running this ping.
I want to wait for QA call to discuss and give the +1 also. I don't
think two of us agreeing is sufficient :-b But assuming they +1 it, I
see subject
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
Fixed
On 11/12/2014 12:12 PM, Tommy wrote:
see subject
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:27:35 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Fixed
thanks. one last fix needed.
4.3.3.2 is still credited as rc instead of release
bye, Tommaso
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:24:30 +0100, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok. let's go ahead with the old NEW bugs (nice oxymoron).
I suggest waiting a few days after the incoming release of LibO 4.3.4
before running this ping.
I want to wait for QA call to discuss and give the +1
