Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 2 last master builds was not start on Windows XP 64-bit

Hi Eike, LibreOffice 5.4: Release Notes: "Platform Compatibility Mac Mac OS X version 10.8 support is deprecated and the next release will require at least Mac OS X 10.9. Windows Uwinapi is discontinued." Thats all! ape -- View this message in cont

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 2 last master builds was not start on Windows XP 64-bit

LibreOfficeDev_5.4.0.0.beta1_Win_x86 does not run in Windows XP sp3 (32-bit), too. TDF organization did not exclude Windows XP from the list of operating systems that can run DevLibreOffice-5.4. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/2-last-master-builds

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 2 last master builds was not start on Windows XP 64-bit

Windows XP 64-bit Edition is not supported by LibreOfficeDev_5.4.0.0.beta1_Win_x86. Whether restored support OS Windows XP 64-bit? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/2-last-master-builds-was-not-start-on-Windows-XP-64-bit-tp4213420p4215025.html Sent from the

[Libreoffice-qa] 2 last master builds was not start on Windows XP 64-bit

master 2017-04-26_22.29.37_LibreOfficeDev_5.4.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86_en-US_de_ar_ja_ru_qtz.msi; master 2017-04-28_00.28.06_LibreOfficeDev_5.4.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86_en-US_de_ar_ja_ru_qtz.msi does not start on Windows XP 64-bit Edition. A message is displayed on the screen: soffice.bin - Entry Point Not

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev_5.2.0.0.b2_deb(x86 or x64) not installed in Lubuntu

OK. English message is in the attached file. lo5.txt -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibODev-5-2-0-0-b2-deb-x86-or-x64-not-installed-in-Lubuntu-tp4185643p4185682.html Sent from the QA mailing

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 or 64 bit)

My OS: Windows XP Professional SP3 RU x32 (full update) and Windows XP 64-bit Edition SP2 ENU+MUI_RU (full update). -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibODev-5-2-0-0-b2-does-not-run-in-Windows-XP-32-or-64-bit-tp4185641p4185675.html Sent from the QA

[Libreoffice-qa] LibODev_5.2.0.0.b2_deb(x86 or x64) not installed in Lubuntu

OS: - Lubuntu-14.04_x64 + LibODev_5.2.0.0.b2_deb_x64 - Lubuntu-16.04_x86 + LibODev_5.2.0.0.b2_deb_x86 LibODev_5.2.0.0.b2_deb is not installed. ape error_install_deb.txt <http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4185643/error_install_deb.txt> -- View this message in context:

[Libreoffice-qa] LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32 or 64 bit)

in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll”. This is regression to LibreOfficeDev_5.2.0.0.beta1_Win_x86 I know about the Bugzzilla database. But today couldn't find section LibreOffice. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibODev-5-2-0-0-b2-does-not-run-in-Windows

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev_amd64 does not run

worked in the win_32 version of LibO-master into 32-bit operating system (e.g. Windows XP_3264 bit edition). -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibODev-amd64-does-not-run-tp4143567p4143791.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com

[Libreoffice-qa] LibODev_amd64 does not run

see the message by OS: “soffice.bin – Entry Point Not Found The procedure entry point InetPtonW could not be located in dynamic link library WS_232.dll. Why? -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibODev-amd64-does-not-run-tp4143567.html Sent from the QA

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.3.5 rc1 test builds available

-libreoffice-4-3-5-release-4.3.5.1.log; - bugs-libreoffice-4-3-5-release-4.3.5.1.wiki. -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-3-5-rc1-test-builds-available-tp4130470p4130543.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive

[Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice 4.2.3rc2 and Bug 46470 (need for LO-4.2.3.3)

://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=572fdb94ecf3dfea6a6f787398efa4e4c54b4718h=libreoffice-4-2) into version ‘4.2.3’ and then publish release ‘LibreOffice 4.2.3.3 (rc3)’, for example, on Saturday.* -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-4

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.3 RC2 test builds available

Hi, Christian! I hope that you read this my post: LibreOffice 4.2.3rc2 and Bug 76470 (need for LO-4.2.3.3) http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-4-2-3rc2-and-Bug-76470-need-for-LO-4-2-3-3-tp4103152.html -- Best regards, ape -- View this message in context: http

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.2.3 RC2 test builds available

Hi Christian, Do you want to publish LibreOffice-4.2.3 with a critical bug that will only in this version of Calc? What do you think about that this release will be used in Ubuntu-14.04? -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Moztrap : 4.2.2. rc1 test run ready

Bug 74357 (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74357) has been fixed by Miklos Vajna. Why is it not included in the log file (http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/)? -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Backtracing in Windows XP

will prolong from the original April 8, 2014 to July 14, 2015. This means that individuals and business users who intend to replace the Windows XP operating system products have 15 months to to prepare. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Backtracing-in-Windows-XP

[Libreoffice-qa] The Wiki-page ReleaseNotes_4.2 requires replacement one image

, because now the option is located on the tab Advanced - button Expert Config Page. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Wiki-page-ReleaseNotes-4-2-requires-replacement-one-image-tp4088569.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] The garbage into the dev-builds.libreoffice.org

(For Florian Reisinger) In addition, a parallel install will not work (under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3) because of a missing MSVCR110.dll -- Install the MS_VCR_ 2012_x86 in your system. -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] The garbage into the dev-builds.libreoffice.org

Hi, Florian The reason for my 1st message is very simple. I use NT-5.1/2, but I do not know which configurations should be at my computer. LibO-Dev_4.2.0 MSI-packages are used different MS_VCR (2010 and 2012), and as a result, have different bugs. Best regards, ape -- View this message

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] The garbage into the dev-builds.libreoffice.org

Hi Florian, I've seen it. Both branches are working on NT-5.1 (XP-32bit) and NT-5.2 (XP-64bit). But @ 47 has an error Installer: try to change the folder in which the MSI package is installed LibO-4.2.0@47. -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Microsoft Installer Error 1937 with TB 39 Windows builds of master for failing assembly signature(s) -- fdo 69601

@: V Stuart Foote Thanks, LibO-Dev_4.2.0.0.alpha0+ (ID: 050248fea53adb6a14b649c5f84dd69a8faff997, TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Time: 2013-10-04_08:16:05) started on Windows XP 64-bit sp2 (last update). -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Microsoft-Installer

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Microsoft Installer Error 1937 with TB 39 Windows builds of master for failing assembly signature(s) -- fdo 69601

saw the changes in mailing addresses of many members of The Community to “collabora”. Sincerely Yours, ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Microsoft-Installer-Error-1937-with-TB-39-Windows-builds-of-master-for-failing-assembly-signature-s-1

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Why no daily master builds

Hi Andras, Thank You for answer. I look forward to the updated master build. Probably does not make sense to report bugs UI prior to publication of the new LibO-master. -- Regards, ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Why-no-daily-master-builds

[Libreoffice-qa] Why no daily master builds

” branch builds are unstable and do not run on Windows XP 32\64-bit. -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Why-no-daily-master-builds-tp4073881.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List

[Libreoffice-qa] The garbage into the dev-builds.libreoffice.org

Hi, all Server at dev-builds.libreoffice.org: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ This part of the site contains many empty and outdated directories. Can anyone from the project managers remove garbage? -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi, Michael! Thanks for the tip. I guessed that this can be done, when compared extracted DEB and RPM archives in Windows. But I was not sure that it is correct. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4071907.html Sent

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

Hi, Florian! Thank you for your reply and advice. Most likely, I will be forced to move to RPM-Linux (Open_SuSE or AltLinux), because I use LibreOffice by TDF only. ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070982

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

I have some computers: from the Core i3-2130 to Xeon e3-1230v2. But I use Windows_XP_64-bit as the primary operating system and *buntu\Debian_amd64 with LXDE or Mate as educational and auxiliary operating systems. The situation is now: I don’t have the opportunity to participate in the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

: 63b86dfdf84edfca0b49d97687e4759dd8d8efff; time: 2013-08-17_22.48.29) runs at the second attempt. Every start accompanied by sending bug reports to Microsoft (an attachment). Regards, ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070536.html

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Release configuration QA builds for Windows from 4-1 branch

/: строка /UserInstallation=$ORIGIN/../LibreOffice/4/ должна иметь вид UserInstallation=$ORIGIN/.. -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Release-configuration-QA-builds-for-Windows-from-4-1-branch-tp4058650p4059781.html Sent from the QA mailing

[Libreoffice-qa] Quality to display and print ODG files with SVG insert

LibreOffice-4 (all_versions) has lost quality to display and print ODG files with SVG insert. This is a regression compared to LibreOffice-3.6.5. Perhaps the reason for porting the Apache's code to LO-4. Please read my posts: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62461 -- ape -- View

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Version 4.0 UNCONFIRMED bugs

which does not allow to open it using WinWord. LibO-3.6.5 don't creates this fragment. Fragment's deletion does DOCX file readable. -- ape -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Version-4-0-UNCONFIRMED-bugs-tp4029443p4029653.html Sent from the QA mailing