Hi Petr
Petr Mladek wrote
> In fact, I do not understand why the mail was so negative when you like
> the change after all.
Because the final result was good.
As you started moving items around you left folders with different contents
for the same tinderbox because symlinks worked only in one
Pedro píše v Pá 07. 12. 2012 v 04:42 -0800:
> Hi Michael
>
>
> Michael Meeks-2 wrote
> >> BTW the build organization improved a lot. Well done!
> >
> > So you're generally happy with the change ? [ it'd be nice to avoid the
> > back-compat symlinks if that works for everyone since they'd clu
Pedro píše v Pá 07. 12. 2012 v 05:55 -0800:
> Hi Petr
>
>
> Petr Mladek wrote
> > PS: Sigh, I need some time to recover from depress. I wanted to do
> > something good effectively and did not expected so strong negative
> > reaction :-(
> >
> > -snip-
> >
> > Is the change really so painful? Si
Hi Petr
Petr Mladek wrote
> PS: Sigh, I need some time to recover from depress. I wanted to do
> something good effectively and did not expected so strong negative
> reaction :-(
>
> -snip-
>
> Is the change really so painful? Sigh
I do believe you are over-worked. There is really no need to b
Hi Michael
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
>> BTW the build organization improved a lot. Well done!
>
> So you're generally happy with the change ? [ it'd be nice to avoid the
> back-compat symlinks if that works for everyone since they'd clutter the
> top-level with two inter-mingled un-related con
Hi,
Pedro píše v Čt 06. 12. 2012 v 08:11 -0800:
> You (whoever did this) could have done exactly the same while showing some
> consideration for the few people who still bother with QA and announcing the
> changes here first. Apologies are nice but avoiding having to apologize is
> much better...
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 08:11 -0800, Pedro wrote:
> You (whoever did this)
Actually, I've no idea who did this :-) we should find out, perhaps
Norbert knows.
> could have done exactly the same while showing some consideration for the
> few people who still bother with QA and anno
Hi Pedro, I am with what you want.
But, go in a nice way, on how to get the things are made, I think is always
better. Sometimes the technicians are in their own world, and do not see how
others are colaborating, and how important are all colaborations for the
project.
At the end the only target fo
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
> I'm sorry you're upset - apologies if we broke some workflow / links of
> yours. On the other hand - asking for some new symlinks can be done more
> elegantly :-)
So, in your book what is really important here is that the symlinks could be
better and that I was rude?
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 03:08 -0800, Pedro wrote:
> I would sincerely like to thank TDF for totally ignoring QA people.
Surely it was input from people doing QA and wanting to encourage
others to do so that caused the change ? we're always trying to improve.
I'm sorry if the way the change
I would sincerely like to thank TDF for totally ignoring QA people.
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Dailies-by-banch-td4021883.html
Although I agree that structuring the Dailies in a more user friendly is a
good idea maybe the people who use it daily could be consulted...
BTW is this wha
11 matches
Mail list logo
