Hi all,
This Wednesday at way-too-early o'clock in the morning* we'll be
having our next QA Meeting.
For the agenda and pending ACTION items, please point your web browser
of choice in the direction of:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2016/January_27
If you don't recall the meeti
Le 26/11/2015 17:00, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Cor,
> In the early days, there was the meme that we needed good bug reports.
> Then that changed to good sample documents; tThen finding the first
> affected version; and now bibisecting.
You forgot the "please provide a full backtrace with symbols"
ecific items you may want to email [board-discuss] list
Warmest Regards,
Joel
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167538.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archi
> Pedro
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167535.html
> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> List Name: Libreoffi
since it is always available, it's low
bandwidth and can be used at any hour without disturbing/waking anyone. We
can probably meet in #libreoffice-qa
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wedne
taking a look to
last minutes of ESC. I'm feeling a bit happier.
I hope sooner rather than later we find the space to propose achieve an ISO
certification in a few years. What really would be a key for open a lot of
doors.
Miguel Ángel
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.docu
Hi All,
> There is a gradually growing number of regressions. Also bibisected
> regressions. I know the ESC has attention for this, and that the board
> recently approved projects/investments that are intended to help to
> change this trend.
> Pedro has a point that he doesn't like to accept the si
Hi Joel,
Joel Madero wrote on 26-11-15 02:31:
> If QA members just bisected each regression (fully bisect) and
> prioritized correctly I *honestly* believe that the regression count
> would fall. I don't understand why this point is being ignored as it's
> literally *completely* in our control.
S
Joel Madero wrote on 25-11-15 16:22:
> Feel free to email the developer list and try to recruit developers to
> do what you're asking. No one is stopping you from doing this :) Doing
> it when many (most) of the regressions are not fully triaged might be a
> frustrating process for all involved.
Hi All,
> BTW would be nice listen from the candidates their opinion about concrete
> matters like this one.
Should have suggested. If you're really interested in knowing candidates
views on specific items you may want to email [board-discuss] list :)
Warmest Regards,
Joel
_
Hi There,
On 11/25/2015 02:04 PM, m.a.riosv wrote:
> BTW would be nice listen from the candidates their opinion about concrete
> matters like this one.
I would be surprised if there was any deviation for any of the
candidates - we've discussed this at length on the Board. Hell I just
brought it u
.
BTW would be nice listen from the candidates their opinion about concrete
matters like this one.
Miguel Ángel.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167417.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at
Hi Pedro,
Le 25/11/2015 16:16, Pedro a écrit :
> Hi Joel
>
>
> jmadero wrote
>>> A sugestion: maybe have a branch dedicated to bug fixes every other year?
>>> Example: let's say 5.1 is dedicated to fixes. Then a slight change of
>>> schedule would postpone 5.2.0 to some months later so that most
act I do
very early testing for Apache OpenOffice (where each release is a regular
install instead of a parallel Dev install)
However if there is no commitment from the Devs to fix regressions then it
really doesn't matter at which stage you catch them...
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View th
>
> Have you tried? Maybe some will say no (and they can continue to work on the
> Master branch) and some may agree.
>
> Do all QA people say No when you ask them to have a Bug Hunting session? Why
> would ALL devs say No???
>
> Why is it impossible to have a Bug Squashing Session for devs? I be
On 11/25/2015 02:40 AM, Pedro wrote:
>
>
>
> Now that Collabora has a paid version (by the UK government) which is a 3
> year LTS some of these bugs might start to be squashed and contributed back
> to the Master branch...
>
> A sugestion: maybe have a branch dedicated to bug fixes every other ye
Hi,
Le 25/11/2015 12:52, Pedro a écrit :
> Hi Joel
>
>
> jmadero wrote
>> That's unfortunate, we should talk about moving the time and/or finding
>> some other way to get dedicated people like yourself on live chat during
>> meeting.
>
> If the meeting could be one hour and a half later (14:30 U
t slice of the pie?
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167334.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mai
of course new features would still be added to Master in
this period) instead of being split by two concurrent branches...
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167320.html
Sent from the QA mailin
Hi Pedro,
> It is impossible for me to join at the 13:00 but I would like to leave two
> questions:
That's unfortunate, we should talk about moving the time and/or finding
some other way to get dedicated people like yourself on live chat during
meeting.
>
> Isn't 16% of Regressions something tha
devs could be
helpful as well, but starting with QA seems like a very good place to
start.
--R
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167281.h
.html)
How can QA (Quality Assurance) and TDF motivate the Devs to worry about the
consistency of the program?
Looking forward to see some answers/opinions in the QA meeting minutes.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Remind
Hi all,
Just a quick reminder that we have our next QA Meeting on Wednesday.
Come say hi in #libreoffice-qa and bring your questions with you!
Cheers,
--R
--
Robinson Tryon
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
qu...@libreoffice.org
802-379-9482 | IRC: co
Hi all,
How's your week going? Aside from a few crying babies next to me right
now, my week has been a bit rainy but pleasant.
Luckily, you can't hear babies cry on IRC, so you should definitely
join in tomorrow (Wednesday) for our QA Meeting in #libreoffice-qa on
Freenode.
Information about the
Hi all,
Quick reminder that we'll be having our QA Meeting this Wednesday at
the *earlier* time we tried out at our last meeting:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2015/July_15
Here's the direct link to the handy-dandy
when-is-it-in-my-local-time-zone? tool :-
https://www.timeanddat
Hello, QA Team!
We'll be having our next QA Meeting this Wednesday in the
#libreoffice-qa channel on Freenode. Agenda and time of meeting are
all listed on the wiki page here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2015/April_22
Looking forward to seeing you there!
Best,
--R
--
Robins
Hi all,
Tomorrow we'll be having another one of our marvelous QA Meetings,
discussing all of the QA-related things that have happened during the
last 2 weeks.
Join in on #libreoffice-qa on Freenode. To find when we're meeting in
your local time, etc... see the agenda here:
https://wiki.documentfou
Hi all,
Once again, we'll have a QA Meeting in #libreoffice-qa on Wednesday
(tomorrow). Details and such are available here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2015/February_11
I know that there are several topics people would like to discuss --
from keywords and Component descriptio
Hello friends,
This Wednesday will be our next QA Meeting -- join us in
#libreoffice-qa on Freenode!
Our meeting time and other important stuff can be found here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2014/December_03
Please be sure to bring any important bugs or topics to the meeting,
Hi all,
Our next QA meeting will be on Wednesday. I believe that most
countries have switched back from daylight savings time, so the
meeting will be held at 18:30UTC, which (for most of you) should be
the same local time as our previous meeting. Check here to be sure:
http://www.timeanddate.com/w
Hi all,
Happy Oktoberfest!
This week we'll have our QA Meeting on Wednesday (same time and place
as usual). Feel free to grab a beer (or other tasty beverage) and join
our discussion of what's been going on in QA.
Agenda and information is here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/20
31 matches
Mail list logo
