Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-25 Thread Michael Stahl
On 18/06/14 17:39, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joel Madero wrote: >> ConfirmedRegression Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression. >>> why do we need this, given that we have a "regression" keyword? this is >>> a pointless alias...

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-18 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joel Madero wrote: > >>> ConfirmedRegression >>> >>> Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression. >> why do we need this, given that we have a "regression" keyword? this is >> a pointless alias... developers don't search for it, the ESC bug-stat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-17 Thread Joel Madero
On 06/17/2014 02:46 AM, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 16/06/14 23:39, Joel Madero wrote: >> *Status* *Question* >> complextest Is this useful? If so – when should we use it? >> unoapitest We have “uno” is that sufficient? > these two are very similar, maybe we could combine them as junittest? H

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-17 Thread Michael Stahl
On 16/06/14 23:39, Joel Madero wrote: > > *Status* *Question* > complextest Is this useful? If so – when should we use it? > unoapitestWe have “uno” is that sufficient? these two are very similar, maybe we could combine them as junittest? > dataloss For me priority means this –

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-16 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, a few comments: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:39:36PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > complextest Is this useful? If so -- when should we use it? > unoapitestWe have "uno" is that sufficient? These are used when a complex test (like in sw/qa/complex/writer/) fails and was temporary disabled a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-16 Thread Joel Madero
> Hi! > Having saved queries against crash/dataloss/perf etc. items gives bugs on > your radar without the need of checking Major/Critical, Summary or comments. > It is easier to be alarmed and IMHO such Whiteboard items could be used > more. Then my follow up question to dataloss is what do we w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-16 Thread bfoman
. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Whiteboard-Status-tp4112588p4112591.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa

[Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

2014-06-16 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All, I've put quite a bit of time updating the wiki site after pulling FDO and viewing all of the whiteboard status' have been used. It isn't complete (needs organized and cleaned a bit more) but it's located here:https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced Below