On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:13 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Hi Terry,
>
> Le 06/10/11 16:40, Terrence Enger a écrit :
>
> I can only speak from my perspective of an "enterprise" user, and thus
> possibly biased ;-)
>
> > Do we have a feeling for what databases are most used "for real" with
>
Hi Terry,
Le 06/10/11 16:40, Terrence Enger a écrit :
I can only speak from my perspective of an "enterprise" user, and thus
possibly biased ;-)
> Do we have a feeling for what databases are most used "for real" with
> Base? Or how they are used?
ODBC is still used as an enterprise-wide solutio
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 09:31 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 00:57 -0400, drew wrote:
> > > well, kind of - there is a number of features that do not work with ODBC
> > > - so I'm just curious what the reason for using SQLite and ODBC would be
> > > for a test bed?
Hi Drew,
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 00:57 -0400, drew wrote:
> > well, kind of - there is a number of features that do not work with ODBC
> > - so I'm just curious what the reason for using SQLite and ODBC would be
> > for a test bed?
So - the ideal test code that we have in the build is small
Hi Bernhard,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:41 +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> Yes, there are some spare cycles. If long tests need to be added, I
> could make it schedule them only daily like the extensive mozilla tests.
Wonderful :-) The database bits are a pain to validate without you
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 23:56 -0400, drew wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 22:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:00 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > >
> > > Ho hum ;-) is there an ODBC driver that sqlite provides that we could
> > > use (in conjunction with a SQLite backend
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 22:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:00 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >
> > Ho hum ;-) is there an ODBC driver that sqlite provides that we could
> > use (in conjunction with a SQLite backend (currently there is none)) to
> > make a fast/light uni
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:00 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> Ho hum ;-) is there an ODBC driver that sqlite provides that we could
> use (in conjunction with a SQLite backend (currently there is none)) to
> make a fast/light unit test for base ? it would be fantastic to have
> anything in thi
Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:33 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Locally installed databases raise questions, and the only
answers that come to mind boil down to a poor man's
substitute for an ODBC data source plus a driver manager
plus who-knows-what. Is there anything here worth
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:00 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Terrence,
>
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
>
> For automated testing the developer's list is prolly the better place
> to post.
Thank you. I'll do that when I start a new thread.
>
> Quite :-)
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:33 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Locally installed databases raise questions, and the only
> > answers that come to mind boil down to a poor man's
> > substitute for an ODBC data source plus a driver manager
> > plus who-knows-what. Is there anything here worth thinki
Hi Terrence,
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> I am wondering about the possibility of automated testing of
> Base, particularly ODBC functionality.
For automated testing the developer's list is prolly the better place
to post.
> The first question here is how to
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> I am wondering about the possibility of automated testing of
> Base, particularly ODBC functionality.
>
> The first question here is how to attach LibreOffice to a
> database for the tests.
...
> Locally installed databases raise questio
13 matches
Mail list logo
