https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127801
--- Comment #19 from Y ---
Thanks V Stuart Foote for drawing my attention to bug 37817.
Generally, I see the scroll bar requirement for off-canvas elements. Your
expert input confirm what I did not know but suspected at comment 15 when
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130862
Muhammet Kara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127508
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #25 from Hei
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127801
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SCROLLING: Optimal View |SCROLLING: Optimal View
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37817
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127801
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127801
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
--- Comm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127801
--- Comment #17 from Y ---
> if "Optimal" is not working for you why not using "Page Width"?
because using "Page Width" results in less pixels used to display the relevant
document portion (that what is not blank, margin, or decoration)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34436
--- Comment #37 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #36)
> Technically and surprisingly, this is NotABug.
I agree with NAB. And the issue is not related to tables, though it's more
surprising since the style Table Conte
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130894
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
PDF is just one format, we need this checkbox on all dialogs. And as said
before I don't like to spoil the system dialogs at all (here the save file
dialog), and we have too many tweaks on it right now
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130706
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #3)
> Excuse me, Heiko, but you put New, why, for what exactly to be done and how?
Confirming the request and to keep the valuable use case; eventually we should
change
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130706
--- Comment #3 from Timur ---
Excuse me, Heiko, but you put New, why, for what exactly to be done and how?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libre
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130894
--- Comment #2 from Timur ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> Do you have File > Export... and [bmp, wmf, png...] in mind?
I meant the dialog for graphics save via right-click.
But why not also File>Export.
> And "[ ] Vie
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130862
Adolfo Jayme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |fit...@ubuntu.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130840
--- Comment #4 from stde...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> (In reply to stdedos from comment #2)
> > When 'Tracking Changes' is activated ...
> >
> > Expected Results:
> > A) All disabled operations are still
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130840
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to stdedos from comment #2)
> When 'Tracking Changes' is activated ...
>
> Expected Results:
> A) All disabled operations are still visible wherever they are supposed to be
What "operation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130894
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130840
--- Comment #2 from stde...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> You summary is very generic and not actionable. Unfortunately I also cannot
> follow your list of improvement ideas. We have a couple of enhancement
> r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130706
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130894
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130862
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kain...@gmail.com
Sta
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130840
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
You summary is very generic and not actionable. Unfortunately I also cannot
follow your list of improvement ideas. We have a couple of enhancement requests
with keyword UX:
bug 34355 Option to s
22 matches
Mail list logo