https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36449
--- Comment #16 from Petros Christopoulos ---
OK, thank you very much for opening the new request
A few minutes ago I had opened
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160504 upon you last post,
-> I provide the link here so
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160505
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36449
--- Comment #15 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #14)
> Writer navigation is already addressed via the Navigate TB, and the Recency
> mode of the Navigator SB Deck.
>
> The Recency feature has not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36449
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Calc|LibreOffice
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36449
Petros Christopoulos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158979
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160249
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160242
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160249
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97757
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160442
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160441
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160447
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160445
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to steve from comment #0)
> The reason users go for dark mode is often because they prefer a dark work
> environment.
The UI should be dark but not the document background. At least you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160230
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159860
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyInteresting,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160194
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyMedium, easyHack,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159906
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160452
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
MSO Excel has "Move and size with cells" active by default for charts and
shapes but "Move but don't size with cells" for raster graphics. Third option
is "Don't move or size with cells". Not so easy
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157420
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157420
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Allow setting a default |Allow setting a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160411
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160452
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160447
--- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #3)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> > Umm, we already have this. Not by copy/clone, rather the New... dialog from
> > the F11
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160447
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160447
Rafael Lima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160445
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|macOS (All) |All
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160441
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160442
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #81 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #80)
> (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #77)
> > I strongly believe, that there must *not* be any mechanics that allow *that*
> > outside of the normal
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #80 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #77)
> I strongly believe, that there must *not* be any mechanics that allow *that*
> outside of the normal page break mechanism. OTOH, any improvements in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160411
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Also, what if you don't want the bubbles?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160411
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #4)
> I guess this is a bubble chart, isn't it?
Hmmm... mostly, yeah! But can you get bubble labels from a column? I believe
that's not possible.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160411
Rafael Lima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160411
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97757
--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
---
*** Bug 160112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160112
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97757
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97757
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160112
--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160112
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159860
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160112
--- Comment #5 from Juergen ---
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #4)
> Which desktop environment are you using, Juergen? I assume GNOME?
>
> I am using Ubuntu 22.04 + GNOME 42.9, and when I click on text, the cursor
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160230
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #7)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #4)
> > Oh, wait!
> >
> > In fact the numbered entries are picked up as accelerator mnemonics for
> > their
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kit...@tutanota.com
--- Comment #20
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160230
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159860
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
--- Comment #11 from Commit Notification
---
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/c51f9f15b8c308e62b4839cc13d623fdab0486c2
tdf#131253 sw: draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137427
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137427
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
--- Comment #10 from Justin L ---
Created attachment 193348
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193348=edit
131253_through2.docx: text boundary should be applied to wrap-through frames
that contain text
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160194
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160194
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158979
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Armondo Lopez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
--- Comment #19 from Commit Notification
---
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-6":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/576398b0493eb642af5221605dcc28ca7656630e
tdf#129905
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:7.6.0 target:24.8.0 |target:7.6.0 target:24.8.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:7.6.0 target:24.8.0 |target:7.6.0 target:24.8.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
--- Comment #18 from Commit Notification
---
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-24-2":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/09b3dd1cb0c1741cf3560fc9faf2aec696d5c9a2
tdf#129905
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.3.3.2 release |6.0.0.3 release
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160112
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
--- Comment #8 from Justin L ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> You mean to AND combine two options? Would be quite surprising for users.
Why do you think that would be surprising for users.
I already stated that this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
--- Comment #17 from Commit Notification
---
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/47af9e64a573684eb42faa097e327e31777a2b58
tdf#129905 tdf#160365
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:7.6.0|target:7.6.0 target:24.8.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
--- Comment #7 from Commit Notification
---
Justin Luth committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/5bf7df62645f73ad69772f318ea3058dfd6fce12
tdf#131253 sw: draw
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:24.8.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160130
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #78 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #77)
> The current page field may be changed e.g. like this: remove the offset from
> the field completely; and introduce another field kind, "page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350
--- Comment #9 from BogdanB ---
Heiko, from my point of view a +1 for book view, like in Google Drive/Bugzilla,
if you will have a Jitsi meeting soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160317
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
There should be means to insert a literal tab character. Lately we had a
discussion on bug 146762 requesting to "Demote level of first list item with
tab (and promote with shift+tab) and introduce
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160349
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
Strong -1 from my side to expose these configuration switches in the primary
UI. Nothing to say against making the life easier for QA but it's quite some
work and could be done per macro.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350
--- Comment #8 from Timur ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)
> Latest on top sounds reasonable. The real world scenario is A,B,C being
> different people replying individually on some comment.
How is that resonable, when
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
Latest on top sounds reasonable. The real world scenario is A,B,C being
different people replying individually on some comment. If the communication is
a thread and B replies on A, and C on B, etc.,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Justin L from comment #5)
> I propose that the frame's "text boundaries" should only show when formatting
> marks are turned on.
You mean to AND combine two options? Would be quite
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #77 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #76)
Page number mechanism in Writer is connected to e.g. ToC, and its numbers. Any
"A user who chooses to [Insert | Page Number] does not want to insert the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129905
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #76 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #70)
> Generally, "ApplyOffset(GetNumberOf(CurrentPage()), N )" implies a numeric
> "page number", which is not a requirement.
It isn't? Page numbers are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jl...@mail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350
--- Comment #5 from Timur ---
G docs and MSO both work as I expect, replies order as inserted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350
--- Comment #4 from Aron Budea ---
Created attachment 193296
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193296=edit
Current order
This screenshot should help showing current behavior.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pedro.jvrc.co...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jcs...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #70 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #69)
And we are back to the wording. It should be fixed. Generally,
"ApplyOffset(GetNumberOf(CurrentPage()), N )" implies a numeric "page number",
which is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #69 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #68)
(not continuing the discussion about how "real" page numbers are set.)
> Note that the wish to show numbers outside of the existing
> range is wrong
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160349
Rafael Lima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #68 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #65)
> (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #61)
> > In LibreOffice, the page number is set through properties of a page break.
>
> Which is a problem, as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #67 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #66)
> Alternatively to a different naming we could hide the field. There are
> plenty of other methods to address the previous/next page number.
Are there
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160324
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||108364
Keywords|
901 - 1000 of 41217 matches
Mail list logo