https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #81 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #80)
> (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #77)
> > I strongly believe, that there must *not* be any mechanics that allow *that*
> > outside of the normal
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #80 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #77)
> I strongly believe, that there must *not* be any mechanics that allow *that*
> outside of the normal page break mechanism. OTOH, any improvements in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Armondo Lopez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #78 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #77)
> The current page field may be changed e.g. like this: remove the offset from
> the field completely; and introduce another field kind, "page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #77 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #76)
Page number mechanism in Writer is connected to e.g. ToC, and its numbers. Any
"A user who chooses to [Insert | Page Number] does not want to insert the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #76 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #70)
> Generally, "ApplyOffset(GetNumberOf(CurrentPage()), N )" implies a numeric
> "page number", which is not a requirement.
It isn't? Page numbers are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pedro.jvrc.co...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jcs...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #70 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #69)
And we are back to the wording. It should be fixed. Generally,
"ApplyOffset(GetNumberOf(CurrentPage()), N )" implies a numeric "page number",
which is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #69 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #68)
(not continuing the discussion about how "real" page numbers are set.)
> Note that the wish to show numbers outside of the existing
> range is wrong
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #68 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #65)
> (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #61)
> > In LibreOffice, the page number is set through properties of a page break.
>
> Which is a problem, as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #67 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #66)
> Alternatively to a different naming we could hide the field. There are
> plenty of other methods to address the previous/next page number.
Are there
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #66 from Heiko Tietze ---
Alternatively to a different naming we could hide the field. There are plenty
of other methods to address the previous/next page number.
I admit the motivation for this ODF attribute is unclear to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #65 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #61)
> However, there should be no way to *set* the page number through the field.
Agreed, I did not mean to suggest that there should be.
> In
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #64 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #62)
> How about "Reference page" for the label and "Change to display the page
> numbers of following or preceding pages" as tooltip. I'd also make it a
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #63 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #62)
> How about "Reference page" for the label and "Change to display the page
> numbers of following or preceding pages" as tooltip. I'd also make it a
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #62 from Heiko Tietze ---
How about "Reference page" for the label and "Change to display the page
numbers of following or preceding pages" as tooltip. I'd also make it a
spinedit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
--- Comment #61 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #60)
There definitely is a bug in the wording (and maybe placement, etc.) of this
"offset" thing. It definitely provokes the problem in understanding of its
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"Page number" automatic |"Page number" automatic
26 matches
Mail list logo
