Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom problems in docker

2016-04-24 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Docker itself and additional software are licensed under the Apache 2.0 > licen

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom problems in docker

2016-04-24 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > * The system that does the packaging. > This one could be free (Trisquel 7 in

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom problems in docker

2016-04-24 Thread Rudolf
Hi Ali, I would suggest that you create project page on the Libreplanet wiki; if there's a chapter in your area then create the project page underneath your chapter's wiki page. This would allow a focused discussion about the alternative docker repository on the wiki, and would give publicity to

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom problems in docker

2016-04-24 Thread Ali Abdul Ghani
I can make free repository and I can make fork from docker uses by default this repository but I dont have server to make it have fun and be free ali miracle 2016-04-24 6:49 جرينتش-07:00, Rudolf : > When it's plainly outlined like that it seems that the freedom problems in > Docker are the same o

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager

2016-04-24 Thread Fabio Pesari
Just by chance, I came across a seemingly unrelated (and a bit old) article which lists pros and cons of various package managers ([0]). According to it, PyPI (Python), RubyGems (Ruby), NPM and Bower (JavaScript) and Lein (Clojure) allow packages without any explicit licensing info into their repos

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom problems in docker

2016-04-24 Thread Rudolf
When it's plainly outlined like that it seems that the freedom problems in Docker are the same ones encountered with GNU/Linux distributions that have proprietary packages in their package repositories and have those available by default. Docker itself and additional software are licensed under th

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom problems in docker

2016-04-24 Thread Tobias Platen
On 04/24/2016 11:23 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: > this is the repository > https://hub.docker.com/ > When you want to run container > you must type docker run The container in you want to run > docker will Download the container from the repository and run it That means there a

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] freedom problems in docker

2016-04-24 Thread Richard Stallman
> this is the repository > https://hub.docker.com/ > When you want to run container > you must type docker run The container in you want to run > docker will Download the container from the repository and run it That means there are three different ethical issues: * The system that doe