On 09/06/2016 01:57 PM, fauno wrote:
> Serge Hooge writes:
>
>>> Their help website is CC-NC-SA, which is non-free in terms of free
>>> culture.
>> But GNU.org and FSF.org use CC-ND, which is also non-free in terms of
>> "free culture", so I am not sure that's a great argument.
>>
>> Source code,
On 2016-09-06 12:34 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> Right. So how is it OK to use this ML to beg for money to non-free
> software and culture? I don't think it should be.
It looks like they use[0-8] and value[9-11,15-16] free software, as well
as value free culture[12-14,15-16].
Admittedly it's
> Their help website is CC-NC-SA, which is non-free in terms of free
> culture.
But GNU.org and FSF.org use CC-ND, which is also non-free in terms of
"free culture", so I am not sure that's a great argument.
Source code, however, I am not sure about indeed.
This[1] is all I managed to find.
Perha
Serge Hooge writes:
>> Their help website is CC-NC-SA, which is non-free in terms of free
>> culture.
> But GNU.org and FSF.org use CC-ND, which is also non-free in terms of
> "free culture", so I am not sure that's a great argument.
>
> Source code, however, I am not sure about indeed.
> This[1]
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Serge Hooge wrote:
> But GNU.org and FSF.org use CC-ND, which is also non-free in terms of
> "free culture", so I am not sure that's a great argument.
>
> Source code, however, I am not sure about indeed.
> This[1] is all I managed to find.
>
> Perhaps a message to
On 2016-09-06 17:34, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Right. So how is it OK to use this ML to beg for money to non-free
software and culture? I don't think it should be.
Sounds like we're just not sure. So maybe before we rush to judgement, this can
b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Right. So how is it OK to use this ML to beg for money to non-free
software and culture? I don't think it should be.
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBC
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Alexander Berntsen
wrote:
> Is their server software AGPL or otherwise free software?
Their help website is CC-NC-SA, which is non-free in terms of free culture.
As for their software, I don't see anything on their GitHub or GitLab
accounts, nor on the webpages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Is their server software AGPL or otherwise free software?
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXzum3AAoJENQqWdRUGk8B9GsP+wVhoyw2XlgJlsbn9fZ807+A
5IC
The problem with BitCoin is that it's a separated currency. It doesn't
really serve to manage existing currencies. I can't use Electrum BitCoin
wallet to manage my Brazilian Reals (I don't have any, but anyways, it's
an example). GNU Taler seems to try to solve it, since it doesn't create
a currenc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/16 10:45, Ineiev wrote:
> Especially because he doesn't seem to believe such system is
> feasible for software,
> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/funding-art-vs-funding-software.html
If
>
I recall correctly, in that piece he (correctly) ide
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:34:00PM +0200, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>
> > However, I don't know what is the best design for payment standards
> > of such particularities described by Stallman.
> Very few people have the requirements of rms, so I do not think that
> catering to his needs should be
12 matches
Mail list logo
