Hi, all,
We've launched our fall fundraiser today, and will have some surprises
to announce in the coming weeks. We hope that you'll spread the
message and help us lead other people to software freedom by the time
it ends on December 31. And if you're an associate member, please keep
an eye out
* Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss
[2021-11-13 17:31]:
>What if there was a combined Free Software, OSHW and Right to Repair
>group, providing ideological leadership in a peer to peer fashion via
>federated services (including Git-based code hosting) and an emphasis
>on teaching
What if there was a combined Free Software, OSHW and Right to Repair
group, providing ideological leadership in a peer to peer fashion via
federated services (including Git-based code hosting) and an emphasis
on teaching how to self-host your own federated hosting infrastructure?
* Arthur Torrey [2021-11-14 22:17]:
> As such, coming at folks w/ an attitude of 'proprietary is evil and
> only Free solutions are acceptable' is not going to win friends...
> We need to be willing to say that partially free / open is better
> than totally locked down, even if it needs
On 2021-11-14 10:03, Arthur Torrey wrote:
> I think that this would be a really good idea, as I see a great deal
> of overlap between the motivations and ideals of the groups... It
> might also be worth reaching out to the 'maker' world as well since it
> also has a lot of overlap I don't do
* Arthur Torrey [2021-11-14 22:17]:
> As I said, I was only using 'purity' for lack of a better term...
> One of the issues that I see is that there isn't always a Free (as
> in source code, might or might not be free as in beer) solution, or
> one that doesn't involve significant sacrifices...
Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
What if there was a combined Free Software, OSHW and Right to Repair
group, providing ideological leadership in a peer to peer fashion via
federated services (including Git-based code hosting) and an emphasis
on teaching how to self-host
I love the idea and I would like to join the effort as I criticize the actions
taken by FSF in relation to libre hardware (endorsements of proprietary in
Respect your Freedom campaign and endorsement of librem devices that seems to
have a built-in backdoor), but I am not sure whether I trust
=> distro picker always points to GNU Guix (:
On 2021-10-29 12:48, Jean Louis wrote:
> stuff
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
On 11/13/21 7:59 PM, Leah Rowe via libreplanet-discuss wrote:
What if there was a combined Free Software, OSHW and Right to Repair
group, providing ideological leadership in a peer to peer fashion via
federated services (including Git-based code hosting) and an emphasis
on
I think such an organization that could provide a powerful voice tying
together free-libre open source hardware and right-to-repair would be
valuable. I don't know if existing organizations are covering that
ground or not.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 8:29 AM Leah Rowe via
On 14/11/2021 20:27, Thomas Lord wrote:
I think the FSF should have gone in this direction a long
time ago.
I think it is a very good idea to add to what you described:
a. Distributed decentralized business models that are NOT
"getting paid to program" or "getting paid to contribute
12 matches
Mail list logo
