if all code
linking to it is licensed with exclusively FSF approved licenses. To me
that seems quite clear and concise.
--
Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed)
https://themusicinnoise.net/
http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/
Public PGP Key:
https://themusicinnoise.net/deathsbreed@themusicinnoise.net_pub.asc
http
ally it'll include the "help wanted" pages as well:
> https://varanusex.housegordon.org
>
I see, I'll look into this then. However I am not very good at anything
web dev.
> Lastly (and this is only my personal opinion and is not necessarily
> shared with other sava
y would it be to extract just the 'help
wanted' section of Savane and modify it to have the improvements I
mentioned earlier (ie. expiring posts and such)?
--
Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed)
https://themusicinnoise.net/
http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/
Public PGP Key:
https://themusicinnoise.ne
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 09:08:03AM +0200, David Hedlund wrote:
> I was just talking with RMS about this. I fully support your idea.
>
> Can you please add the page /savannah/-/hackers/-pub...@gnu.org?
I'm confused... "add the page"? Sorry, I just don't understand.
--
Ni
o by used by a non-free
software project (as then the terms of the (A)GPL would apply making it
free software).
[0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2017-04/msg00019.html
--
Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed)
https://themusicinnoise.net/
http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/
Public PGP Key:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:33:23PM -0400, Michael Pagan wrote:
> On 17 Apr 2017 at 14:22, Nicolás A. Ortega wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:32:58PM -0400, Michael Pagan wrote:
> >>
> >> This is the direct strategy employed by the GNU Project. I believe
AGPLv3, but not the other way around, that I am aware of) and
on top of that prohibit sublicensing. Personally I would not have an
issue with this (as I license just about all my software projects under
the (A)GPL), but I know many people who would and would end up rejecting
the library because it does
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:32:58PM -0400, Michael Pagan wrote:
> Nicolás A. Ortega <deathsbr...@themusicinnoise.net> writes:
>
> > I've tried having this discussion on #fsf and #gnu, and I think that
> > this license has the potential to be a great software license,
>
oper and a software user, and so I am unlikely to switch.
That's fine, I like the xGPL licenses as well and use them for most of
my projects. However, I don't work on libraries either, and I think that
such a license would be really good for Free Software libraries.
--
Nicolás Ortega Froysa (D
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 04:17:31PM -0400, Adam Van Ymeren wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Nicolás A. Ortega <
> deathsbr...@themusicinnoise.net> wrote:
>
> > Not necessarily. The MIT license gives the user the same freedoms as the
> > xGPL, however it is
e that gives the same freedoms.
>
> - --Bob.
>
> On 2017-04-16 05:11 AM, Nicolás A. Ortega wrote:
> > The Sleepycat license would be useful for a library because unlike
> > the GPL (or AGPL) it doesn't force the user of said library
> > (developing a program that l
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 04:48:52PM -0700, Ian Kelling wrote:
>
> Nicolás A. Ortega <deathsbr...@themusicinnoise.net> writes:
>
> > I've tried having this discussion on #fsf and #gnu, and I think that
> > this license has the potential to be a great software license,
&
GPL), but to me those aren't compelling reasons to
> switch away from xGPL.
>
> - --Bob.
>
>
> On 2017-04-15 05:55 AM, Nicolás A. Ortega wrote:
> > I've tried having this discussion on #fsf and #gnu, and I think
> > that this license has the potential to be a
, and will to do this (if it
is possible). (^_^)
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleepycat_license
--
Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed)
https://themusicinnoise.net/
http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/
Public PGP Key:
https://themusicinnoise.net/deathsbreed@themusicinnoise.net_pub.asc
http
> Hi Mx. Ortega,
Nicolás is fine, adfeno, I'm Deathsbreed from #fsf and #parabola.
> Perhaps we can make use of LibrePlanet wiki (which uses Semantic
> MediaWiki, which is more dynamic than MediaWiki) to do such listings.
I am not sure that MediaWiki would be the right tool for the jo
ind such a project it would help the Free Software community to take
advantage of all of these people who are eager to contribute but trying
to find a good place to start.
--
Nicolás A. Ortega (Deathsbreed)
https://themusicinnoise.net/
http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/
Public PGP Key:
https://themusici
16 matches
Mail list logo
