On 26.08.2016 23:03, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> I have to disagree here. Comparing this to GPL violation is outrageous.
You might be right and the parallelism I made is too extrapolated.
Thanks for noting that.
Tiberiu
Ali, thanks for your arguments. Schematics don't make a hardware
free-design hardware, as PaulK has stated and as Richard's essay
explains. It's the PCB design sources. Schematics are usually PDF files.
I doubt any of the people who now hold the EOMA68-A20 computer boards
would disobey the project
On 26.08.2016 22:47, Eric Schultz wrote:
> This isn't really my topic but you've made your point (repeatedly).
> Respectfully, please don't fill my inbox to say the same thing over and
> over when people disagree and when numerous people have asked you to
> stop and to drop them from discussions.
On 26.08.2016 19:05, Josh Branning wrote:
> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic
>
> Maybe they /do/ intend to release the CAD files when they say they will.
> In which case, has it occurred to you that the kind of things you are
> saying:
>
> A) May look a bit silly once (and if) th
On 26.08.2016 21:48, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> It seems the problem is the meaning of “libre” in terms of unreleased
> hardware/software. EOMA68 certainly is aligned with libre culture and
> significant for freedom because of its modularity standard. It also is
> GPL-compliant like any un
On 26.08.2016 19:27, Ali Razeen wrote:
> I follow your argument but to make sure we’re on the same page, let me try to
> rephrase it in my own words so that you can agree or disagree. I believe you
> claim that we cannot say that the EOMA68 is “libre hardware from the
> beginning” because we hav
Thank you, Ali. I really appreciate you taking the time to answer my
call and share your opinion on the libreplanet-discuss mailing list.
On 26.08.2016 16:28, Ali Razeen wrote:
> If this is true in the libre hardware world,
I follow your logic, but I'm not sure there is an exact analogy libre
sof
On 26.08.2016 12:46, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le jeudi 25 août 2016 à 23:22 -0400, John Sullivan a écrit :
>> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes:
>> Below are more attempts of ThinkPenguin to brainwash people.
>>
>> This stops now on this list. ThinkPenguin is not de
On 26.08.2016 06:22, John Sullivan wrote
> What this *should* be is a discussion among people on the same side to
> refine text and messaging such that it is accurate, approachable, and
> effective. Please make it that.
I believe your or other FSF staff member's comments on the points raised
here
On 26.08.2016 05:22, Christopher Waid wrote:
> The project is claiming to be a libre hardware/software project, not
> that everything has been released yet.
Then it's not a libre hardware project yet!
And need I remind you that outside your organization there is an
organization/user of an EOMA68
On 26.08.2016 05:16, Christopher Waid wrote:
> On 2016-08-25 06:26 PM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>> On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>>> On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>>>> This issue of "you said it is 'libre
On 26.08.2016 04:03, André Silva wrote:
> Hi guys, i let you know that our url about EOMA68 news has been changed
> [0] to fix misleading information there too.
>
> [0]:https://www.parabola.nu/news/new-ryf-seeking-hardware-crowdfunding-project-with-parabola-pre-installed/
That's a good thing. Oh,
On 26.08.2016 02:18, Christopher Waid wrote:
> On 2016-08-25 05:59 AM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>> On 25.08.2016 11:42, Christopher Waid wrote:
>>> I'm having a hard time taking you seriously. Wake me when you've
>>> actually contributed something of s
On 26.08.2016 01:33, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le vendredi 26 août 2016 à 01:26 +0300, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic a écrit :
>> On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
On 25.08.2016 15:47, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
> On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
>> This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even
>> the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, ca
On 25.08.2016 15:25, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even
> the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be
> easily solved by changing terms/words accordingly there. There's no need
> to make everyone mad at
On 25.08.2016 11:42, Christopher Waid wrote:
> I'm having a hard time taking you seriously. Wake me when you've
> actually contributed something of significance and aren't just trying to
> undermine those working on solving these problems. For some of us it
> isn't about financial gain. We actually
spect to freedom:
"5% off free software-friendly devices from ThinkPenguin" --
https://my.fsf.org/
But for you it must be as you say, just a "minor issue" you "can't
afford waste time" on it. For the rest of us, including founder of the
free software movement and
Hi,
We are quite satisfied with the performance of the Tehnoetic N300
Wireless USB Adapter for GNU/Linux-libre:
https://tehnoetic.com/tet-n300
Tiberiu
PS We have submitted this and other recently added WiFi adapters for the
RYF certification of FSF.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 06/16/2016 04:49 AM, Luke wrote:
> You bring up a good point, there is a risk of having words twisted, but
> I think that is a price to pay for free speech.
Free speech means saying what you want to say (if it's not hate speech,
but that a different discussion) as your own opinion. Repeating wh
On 06/15/2016 11:24 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > 2. **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works
> > included in products of the Parabola project are [Free
> > Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition),
>
> I will fetch that page now, but if I remember righ
21 matches
Mail list logo