pretty much any computer made in the last 20 years can run a
(mostly) free OS such as ubuntu - i dont think the question
would have been asked for an answer like: "this one comes with
linux installed" - i think the question was more specifically:
"where can one get a computer that has a 100% libre
most desktop computers will work just fine - the usual problems
are the wifi and graphics devices - wifi is relatively
inexpensive and easy to replace - the graphics device is a
bigger concern; but the generally will work out of the box,
albeit without 3D acceleration - the only new desktops ive
On Mon, 13 May 2019 13:17:15 +0200 mray wrote:
> There is no "email" company where all people have their mail.
> There are different servers (or "instances") that talk to each
> other.
that is somewhat of a misconception though - anyone can run
their own email service - the fact that most people
it is a federated web service - an instance is a copy of the web
service that is running on some host, such that all compatible
instances are inter-operable to some degree
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
im not very familiar with the term (buzzword?) "groupware"; but
that description sounds like what mattermost aims to be: an
all-in-one team management, communication, collaboration website
- essentially a free clone of slack-chat, or the altassian web
suite
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:50:44 -0400 Matt wrote:
> You can of course download and install the 'hub' client from GitHub.
of course, if one does not object to using a command line tool, one
could simply install weboob and that would avoid the very same dilema
for hundreds of websites all at once
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:51:55 -0500 Cal wrote:
> I'll believe you when Trisquel stops using it.
FWIW, trisquel started using gitlab many years ago, when it was not
nearly as libre-friendly as it is today, so you really can not credit
it for that reason - it was also before pagure existed - i think
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:51:26 -0400 Michael wrote:
> To join in the discussion about gitlab's librejs plan, you can find
> the open ticket here:
> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/15621
"Opened Apr 26, 2016"
you might think that three years is enough time to decide a simple "yes
or
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:05:58 -0500 Cal wrote:
> GitHub requires proprietary software (JavaScript).
most of the github website is functional with librejs, including
opening bug reports and commenting on existing ones
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
J.B. Nicholson wrote:
> Perhaps someone reading would please post URLs where LP livestream
> archives are available online
https://media.libreplanet.org/
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 20:12:24 -0700 Aaron wrote:
> I'm with you here. I still today see lots of people using "Open
> Source" with NO care for the free/libre values. I often have
> conversations where
i think the real essence of these confusions is that people use the
terms "open-source" and
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:11:34 +0300 Dmitry wrote:
> So there are two options:
i will suggest a third option, as i did on the new trisquel
"General Free Software Talk" web forum which is actually backed by the
'freedom-misc' mailing list, and apparently serves very much the same
purpose as this
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019 09:28:09 -0500 Mike wrote:
> For example:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-02/msg9.html
ill call that example and raisze you this one:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/directory-discuss/2017-12/msg8.html
joinlaw -
you could have just asked parabola - parabola does not take
black-listing lightly - the answer would have been, that before
black-listing any program, the first order of business is to try
modifying the program to be FSDG-free - if that is not possible or is
too much trouble, then the
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:51:59 +0100 Julian wrote:
> Trustability ranks can be adjusting for not trolling people.
> Deffining/ ranking software" quality" and user safety are different
> things. Quality can be very arbitrary.
that was not to say that the rankings can only be intended for shaming
On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:35:15 -0500 bill-auger wrote:
> such rankings could only lead to some projects optimizing
> for the "score" as to snowball it into the "leader" position;
allow me to elaborate on that a bit - that was not merely a vague
prediction - it already ha
as much as i hate to be a web blanket :) - i must say that my
suggestion to elect Nicolás the chief of this operation was entirely
sarcastic - this discussion is all well intentioned, of course, but
not very realistic
take this as one representative example (i.e. food for thought) - the
chromium
awesome idea - i nominate Nicolás to oversee this effort
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:09:00 + Lyberta wrote:
> https://lyberta.net/articles/tech/free_sw_untrusted.html
i think you are quite mistaken about JUCE - it does indeed contain
a phone "home feature"; which caused a huge fuss within the community,
which lasted for about 2 days, until everyone
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:07:42 -0600 Caleb wrote:
> Guix and GuixSD also does Reproducible Builds. (Although Debian is
> probably the more usable option right now.)
"usable" is not the best word there - debian is the one that has the
highest percentage of reproducible packages; but in fact, most
off-hand, activity-pub comes to mind
___
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
TBH, it should not be any surprise from where that affiliation
confusion may stem - a quick web search shows that the FSFE presents
itself as part of "The FSF network"[1]
* 1985: The Free Software Foundation (FSF)
* 2001: Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE)
* 2003: Free Software
ah what a topic - so ideally suited for bike-shedding - i could do that
too but i will refrain and instead just answer with some cold facts
to address the OP's question directly, the GPL derives its authority
from copyright law; not from the author of the license, nor the author
of the work that
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:42:40 +0200 Nicolás wrote:
> Well, if we're going that route it'd be easier to setup an NFS
> filesystem with an FTP server pointing to the same directory.
of course, it would be easier still, to buy an $8 USB storage stick and put
your files on that - no network nor SAAS
On 08/09/2018 09:56 PM, Jim Garrett wrote:
> These are rather cosmetic issues that I'm
> sure will be resolved in future versions, and I look forward to using it
> in the future, but in the meantime it's not adequate.
i would not be so sure - bugs do not fix themselves - the success of
free
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:11:58 +0200 Daniel wrote:
> The FSFE constitution[1] makes an explicit call to "join forces" with
> the FSF
>
> Is anybody aware of other groups
i dont know what this particular joining of forces entails; but the FS is
already quite friendly with FSFLA - and the FSFLA
sandstorm has all those webby goodies
https://apps.sandstorm.io/
self-host or "one click install" on their instance
https://oasis.sandstorm.io/
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 20:23 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Is there any wiki page summarizing the options given in this thread or
> could anybody
27 matches
Mail list logo
