-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> So we can learn any programming language without risk in time to see
> it becoming more (close, proprietary, restricted ...) than another
> one?
Let's be a bit more specific here. There are several potential sources
of nonfreedom in a language:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> I agree that it would be good to have a list of languages categorized
> by freedom status and typical use cases for each language.
> The list would not be comprehensive, but it might still be a good
> thing to have as a quick reference.
Something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Fabio: I consider the platform part of the toolchain. However, you *do*
raise a valid point that I omitted - whether the language can run on
free OSes. While it is *exceedingly* rare these days, another potential
source of nonfreedom in a
"..Perl, the first postmodern computer language.. greatness is
measured by how much freedom you give to others, not by how much you
can coerce others to do what you want..":
http://wall.org/~larry/pm.html
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:04 PM, aurelien wrote:
> Alexander Berntsen
aurelien writes:
> Fabio Pesari writes:
>
>> On 02/03/2016 09:04 PM, aurelien wrote:
>>> Sorry, I was thinking that programming language are under license like
>>> software.
>>>
>>> So we can learn any programming language without risk in time to see it
Koz Ross writes:
>> I agree that it would be good to have a list of languages categorized
>> by freedom status and typical use cases for each language.
>> The list would not be comprehensive, but it might still be a good
>> thing to have as a quick reference.
>
>
On 02/03/2016 09:04 PM, aurelien wrote:
> Sorry, I was thinking that programming language are under license like
> software.
>
> So we can learn any programming language without risk in time to see it
> becoming more (close, proprietary, restricted ...) than another one?
Well, for starters I
Fabio Pesari writes:
> On 02/03/2016 09:04 PM, aurelien wrote:
>> Sorry, I was thinking that programming language are under license like
>> software.
>>
>> So we can learn any programming language without risk in time to see it
>> becoming more (close, proprietary, restricted
aurelien writes:
> aurelien writes:
>
>> Fabio Pesari writes:
>>
>>> On 02/03/2016 09:04 PM, aurelien wrote:
Sorry, I was thinking that programming language are under license like
software.
So we can learn any
On 03/02/16 03:04 PM, aurelien wrote:
> Alexander Berntsen writes:
>
>> On 03/02/16 19:59, aurelien wrote:
>>> Is there a list of free as in freedom programming language?
>> Programming languages are not software, so you'll have to be a bit
>> more specific as to what
> Sorry, I was thinking that programming language are under license like
software.
Well, implementations of languages are licensed. For instance GCC is a free
compiler for C, but there can also be prorietary compilers for C. C itself
is neither free nor nonfree.
-Alan Beadle
I agree that it would be good to have a list of languages categorized by
freedom status and typical use cases for each language.
The list would not be comprehensive, but it might still be a good thing to
have as a quick reference.
Who has ideas about the right way to start building and hosting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> Thanks for chiming in, this is pretty good. What are your opinions
> about having a wiki kind of like this, perhaps linking to the FSD
> pages for tools corresponding with languages? Does that seem
> productive?
>
> -Alan Beadle
Well, in all
> Something like an awesome-languages list? What I mean by this is
> something similar to https://notabug.org/koz.ross/awesome-c or
> https://notabug.org/koz.ross/awesome-gamedev. Disclaimer: I maintain
> both.
Thanks for chiming in, this is pretty good. What are your opinions about
having a wiki
Le mer. 3 févr. 2016 à 20:07, carl hansen
a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:59 AM, aurelien
wrote:
Is there a list of free as in freedom programming language?
http://www.gnu.org/manual/manual.html#Software
start of a list.
Algol? You
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:59 AM, aurelien wrote:
>
> Is there a list of free as in freedom programming language?
>
> http://www.gnu.org/manual/manual.html#Software
start of a list.
Algol? You got it.
Sadly, people are keen to confuse "programming language" with "programming
language implementation", because so many languages have only one
implementation (C being a notable counterexample). Only the latter is
software.
On 4 February 2016 at 09:12, aurelien wrote:
> Koz
> Now augment that GNU list with all relevant free software programming
language implementations:
> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Category/Programming-language
That category in the wiki isn't supposed to be for implementations of
languages, it's supposed to be for sorting everything by what
I guess I'm not sure what to make of it in that case. All I know is that if
you edit 0AD and look at the "categories" tab and click the "?" near the
"Programming Language" section, it says that it is meant to show what
language the program was written in.
The category seems to be actively used in
It does purposefully contain programming language implementations
though. For instance, the A+ language entry on that page doesn't even
contain information on what language it's implemented in, which
suggests that it was tagged with the
"Software-development:programming-language" solely to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/02/16 19:59, aurelien wrote:
> Is there a list of free as in freedom programming language?
Programming languages are not software, so you'll have to be a bit
more specific as to what freedoms you mean.
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
Alexander Berntsen writes:
> On 03/02/16 19:59, aurelien wrote:
>> Is there a list of free as in freedom programming language?
> Programming languages are not software, so you'll have to be a bit
> more specific as to what freedoms you mean.
Sorry, I was thinking that
22 matches
Mail list logo