Re: ‘censorship’ (was: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 114, Issue 8)

2019-10-12 Thread David
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:10:25 +0100 David wrote: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:47:42 +0300 > Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > David wrote: > > > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO > > > as the very same core points could have been made in a less > > >

Re: ‘censorship’ (was: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 114, Issue 8)

2019-10-12 Thread David
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 23:47:42 +0300 Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: > David wrote: > > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO > > as the very same core points could have been made in a less > > excitable manner without potential breaching of the above linked

Re: ‘censorship’ (was: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 114, Issue 8)

2019-10-11 Thread 'smee via libreplanet-discuss
The dictionary definition you gave has a couple issues. Notice that censor is the only definition that includes examining. Moderating, in the sense that the dictionary intends, is when people moderate themselves, there's no examination that needs to be done (save for internal examination) to avoid

Re: ‘censorship’ (was: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 114, Issue 8)

2019-10-10 Thread Adam Van Ymeren
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:48 PM Dmitry Alexandrov <[1]321...@gmail.com> wrote: David <[2]postmas...@customer-opinions.net> wrote: > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO as the very same core points could have been made in a less excitable mann

Re: ‘censorship’ (was: libreplanet-discuss Digest, Vol 114, Issue 8)

2019-10-10 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
David wrote: > Calling such actions "censorship" is a very extreme reaction IMHO as the very > same core points could have been made in a less excitable manner without > potential breaching of the above linked guidelines and thus without > triggering any negative actions. That’s curious. Coul