Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

El 6/3/22 a las 17:34, Valentino Giudice escribió: > - Make sure you have a good understanding of copyright and patent law, > and that which you are trying to achieve is legally possible, and that > you fully understand what the side effects are. Hi Valentino, As I proposed to Pen-Yuan you are

Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

El 8/3/22 a las 17:54, Pen-Yuan Hsing escribió: > On 08/03/2022, Julian Daich wrote: >> El 6/3/22 a las 14:27, Pen-Yuan Hsing escribió: >>> >>> Dear Julian, >>> >>> Have you looked at the CERN Open Hardware License 2.0? >>> >>> https://ohwr.org/project/cernohl/wikis/Documents/CERN-OHL-version-2

Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

El 6/3/22 a las 14:27, Pen-Yuan Hsing escribió: > > Dear Julian, > > Have you looked at the CERN Open Hardware License 2.0? > > https://ohwr.org/project/cernohl/wikis/Documents/CERN-OHL-version-2 >> It has a strongly-reciprocal variant which is like the GPL but for > physical objects: > > htt

Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

On 08/03/2022, Julian Daich wrote: > El 6/3/22 a las 14:27, Pen-Yuan Hsing escribió: >> >> Dear Julian, >> >> Have you looked at the CERN Open Hardware License 2.0? >> >> https://ohwr.org/project/cernohl/wikis/Documents/CERN-OHL-version-2 >>> It has a strongly-reciprocal variant which is like the

Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

I fully support and agree to advices given by Valentino. * Valentino Giudice [2022-03-06 18:35]: > This is the most advisable path for writing a new free license: > - DON'T. Actually, I don't. Really really don't. We have enough > license proliferation already. > > If you decide that there is a

Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

This is the most advisable path for writing a new free license: - DON'T. Actually, I don't. Really really don't. We have enough license proliferation already. If you decide that there is an absolute need for a new free license, which outweighs the cost (which is unlikely), then: - Make sure you ha

Re: For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

Dear Julian, Have you looked at the CERN Open Hardware License 2.0? https://ohwr.org/project/cernohl/wikis/Documents/CERN-OHL-version-2 It has a strongly-reciprocal variant which is like the GPL but for physical objects: https://ohwr.org/cern_ohl_s_v2.txt Is there something you're trying t

For reviewing a new free license. People who have read and understand the GPL

Hi, I am looking for volunteers to review a free license very close to the GPL v.3 but with some key differences It is intended to be used for licensing physical things and other aspects of technology in general in addition to copyright as methods, formulations. etc The license is copyleft and