Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:28:31 +
From: "Matthew Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] unsubscribe digest
>Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:55:23 +0700
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > I still think that Dan needs to add the word "with" in order to
> > avoid further confusion.
>
>Ask him to r
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:55:56 -0800
From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Care to expand on this for us newbies, Pres
> I would like to know what happened to the Win98 protected mode floppy
> drivers that eliminated the "compatibility mode"
>
> I haven
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:27:23 -0500
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
>
> The Amherst site shows floppy drivers originating at the UK Toshiba site
for
> both the L100 and L110. I have no experience with either of these, I'm
using
> W95, but they are here:
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:15:40 -0500
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
>
> You have to look online.. Or you can check a local battery shop. One
> other place is look at www.radioshack.com
Nope. Because they become bombs when mistreated, you c
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:14:16 -0500
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
]>
> Where would you get new cells from? They usually don't sell li-ion
> to consumers.
>
I have a few bad packs. One, a lo-cap for the L100, has one of its three
cells sligh
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:11:28 -0500
From: Pres Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
> So, like so many of you, Ive had my libretto for a few years and
> have found the battery performance degrading. With Ni-Cads, it was
> possible to recondition the battery
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:03:04 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
Douglas,
>That is one of the ones which I have tried unsucessfully
The Amherst site shows floppy drivers originating at the UK Toshiba site for
both the L100 and L110. I have no experience wit
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:53:04 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT
At 12:37 PM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:30:57 +
>From: "Eugene Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystal
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:43:45 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
At 02:22 PM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:17:36 -0600
>From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
>
>You have
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:15:37 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus update
At 09:34 AM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:29:14 -0600
>From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus update
>
>Hmm mine showed nimda worm..migh
Date: 11 Jan 2002 10:02:00 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nik Ahmad Fahmi)
Subject: Re: [LIB] Libretto replacement-ish review
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:40:13 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LIB] Libretto replacement-ish review
> That's the LOOX in Japan, o
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:33:36 -0800
From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
That is one of the ones which I have tried unsucessfully
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:24:43 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] CT 110 Floppy
There is a windows driver on the toshiba web site. It is either under
the 100CT listing or the 110CT listing.
On 13 Jan 2002, at 16:12, Douglas Asmussen wrote:
> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:07:27 -0800
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:07:27 -0800
From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: CT 110 Floppy
Hi All, have just formatted and installed windows 98 SE on my 110, I have been having
a heck of a time getting the floppy to work, basically it doesn't except from a Win98
startup disk. Am I
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:17:36 -0600
From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
You have to look online.. Or you can check a local battery shop. One
other place is look at www.radioshack.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:55:07 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Where would you get new cells from? They usually don't sell li-ion
to consumers.
On 13 Jan 2002, at 13:53, phillip ramirez wrote:
> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:47:21 -0600
> From: "phillip r
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:47:21 -0600
From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] reconditioning batteries
Just went over this on the tp600 list ;-) yes it is possible as long as
it does not have a smart chip on the battery itself. The TP's have a
chip that after so many cycles
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:26:30 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
On 13 Jan 2002, at 10:12, Adrian Ho wrote:
> Yeah. They shed /zero/ useful info. I could claim to be you on a
> nasty-gram, and no one (perhaps not even the list owner) could prove it
> wasn't you. Nasty.
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 16:21:56 -0500
From: "Clarence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: reconditioning batteries
So, like so many of you, Ive had my libretto for a few years and
have found the battery performance degrading. With Ni-Cads, it was
possible to recondition the battery (of course, with n
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 15:09:15 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT
On 13 Jan 2002, at 12:37, Eugene Hsu wrote:
> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:30:57 +
> From: "Eugene Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:30:57 +
From: "Eugene Hsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Amorphous LCD vs. LTPS Crystaline LCD vs. TFT
Hmmm sorry for this long message
Does anyone know of a good LCD-industry access or LCD discussion board. It
has been a while since I took physical electro
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 02:05:12 +0800
From: Adrian Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:39:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did anyone look at the headers?
Yeah. They shed /zero/ useful info. I could claim to be you on a
nasty-gram, and no one (perh
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:00:32 -0600
From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus
You know I was thinking this would be the case but was unsure. Like I
said its been about 2 years since even trying to track myself when using
remailers hehe
-Original Message-
Fro
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:30:36 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
All someone would need to do is obtain the list of names, put [LIB]
in the subject use the mailing list as a return address and everyone
would think it is from the list. Did anyone look at the headers?
On 1
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 01:30:55 +0800
From: Adrian Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:19:19AM -0800, phillip ramirez wrote:
> But looks like it orig from a 65.174.101.7 ip address
All Libretto list mail passes through that address, and all Libretto list
ma
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:29:14 -0600
From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus update
Hmm mine showed nimda worm..might have been more then one virii.. Have
to run a scan
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Asmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, Janua
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 09:23:39 -0800
From: Douglas Asmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Virus update
Yup that is the name that I noticed on the mail before I deleted it from the VS
quarantine, according to the VS files it was the JS.Exception.Exploit one. HTH
***
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:16:40 -0600
From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus
If nav nabbed it it is already deleted or pulled over to its quarentine
area.. It was from its been too long since I have tried to decode
headers.. But looks like it orig from a 65.174.101.7
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:08:39 -0600
From: "phillip ramirez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LIB] Virus
Avg got it for me
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Asmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:33 AM
To: Libretto
Subject: [LIB] Virus
Date: Sat, 12 Jan
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 22:21:11 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
At 04:39 AM 13/01/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:33:23 +0700
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
>
>> Hi not sure if anybody else was the recipient of the post from s
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:33:23 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] Virus
> Hi not sure if anybody else was the recipient of the post from some head
moron whatever but mine contained an unwelcome guest which set off my virus
software. No damage done luckily just a heads up to the res
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:55:23 +0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] unsubscribe digest
> I still think that Dan needs to add the word "with" in order to
> avoid further confusion.
Ask him to remove the dead FAQ link too, please
http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html
32 matches
Mail list logo
