The libtool-multilang branch of libtool seems to be having
difficulties lately due to its assumption that -B (a MIPS
compatability option in GNU nm) is accepted by nm. Unfortunately, it
is not accepted by BSD or Solaris nm, and produces an error message
similar to the following:
checking command
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> All the "error while copying" messages are innocuous because
> the copy is actually successful. It seems weird that the
> "cp" should return non-zero status to the automake Perl script.
Cygwin does that for me too. Linux behaves p
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:51:50AM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> Anyway, the last message bothers me:
>
> $ ./bootstrap
> [[snip]]
> configure.in: 33: required file `../ltconfig' not found
Already fixed in the repository. Please update again.
The problem is deepr than the cheap fix I committed
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:00:04PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello, Gary!
Hi Pavel.
> The latest commit to the head brach in the libtool repository breaks
> libtool. With autoconf-2.13 and automake-1.4 this looks like this:
>
> [[snip]]
> configure.in: 33: required file `../ltconfig' not fou
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:41:58PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: Index: ChangeLog
: --- ChangeLog Thu Sep 7 08:22:46 2000
: +++ ChangeLog Thu Sep 7 13:36:19 2000
: @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
: +2000-09-07 Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: +
: + * libtool.m4 (_LT_AC_LTCONFIG_HACK): fixed incorrect use
Hello!
This patch fixes problems with autoconf-2.49a. It still produces tons of
warnings but no errors.
The errors were caused by calling autoconf macros while non-standard
quotes are in effect. This patch fixed the problem:
===
Index: ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog Thu Sep 7 08
Hello Chris,
Chris Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CF> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:34:12PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
>>Mandatory data imports marking: I *hate* this feature and develop
>>libtool re-implementation which frees programmer from it. But when I
>>mentioned it on cygwin maillist,
Hello Alexandre,
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AO> On Sep 4, 2000, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But now, I think that's just too messed, It would be easier to add
>> --bindir= option to libtool --mode=install and teach automake supply
>> it.
AO> Yep, this is prob
Hello Bernard,
Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Before I go for it, let me summary some PE-DLL idiosycrasies and
>> how they are accounted by some people vs me:
>>
>> Implibs: I consider implib unalienable part of DLL model, and eager to
>> support this MS feature; I'd never
[I hope this is the right place for the page problem...]
I've noticed that the
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html
page seems to have a cvs conflict in it. Take a look a the left hand bar
around the "Future Directions" heading
Is there a release schedule for 1.4 or MLB(1.5?). Just
10 matches
Mail list logo