Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > On Monday 14 May 2001 1:31 am, Bruce Korb wrote: > > When this invocation fires, > > an "anonymous template" is created with that text and then processed. > > The output is redirected to an unlinked file (no Windows here), > > and read back in. > > Ee

Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > This is how I envision the logistics of integrating your branch to avoid CVS > merge hell: > > * Finish the MLB->HEAD merge. > * Flush the patch queue (for HEAD and branch-1-4) > * Release libtool-1.4.1 (libtool-1.4-p1?) from br

RE: libtool´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?

Title: My thoughts exactly, that was most enlightening. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ¿Â¶óÀÎÄÚ¸®¾ÆSent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:09 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: libtool´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä? ¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ À¯¸Ó ¢Å  ... ¾Æ¹«ÂÉ·

libtool´Ô ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä?

Title: ¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ À¯¸Ó ¢Å ¡á°ú½Ã¿åA girl got an engagement ring, and would seize every opportunity for calling attention to it.  In a group with girl friends no one noticed it.  Finally when herfriends were sitting around talking, she got up suddenly and said, "It's awfully hot in he

Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

Hi Bruce, On Monday 14 May 2001 1:31 am, Bruce Korb wrote: > When this invocation fires, > an "anonymous template" is created with that text and then processed. > The output is redirected to an unlinked file (no Windows here), > and read back in. Eeek! I was already worried about getting guile

Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

Hi Bruce, This is how I envision the logistics of integrating your branch to avoid CVS merge hell: * Finish the MLB->HEAD merge. * Flush the patch queue (for HEAD and branch-1-4) * Release libtool-1.4.1 (libtool-1.4-p1?) from branch-1-4 * Release 1.5b from HEAD,