This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project GNU Libtool.
The branch, master has been updated
via 3ae7bf0b911b9765151e9b5c51656bed2e07b01d (commit)
from
I got a report from Jeremy that -force_load with multi-architecture
archives requires that the archives be ranlibbed.
Pushed this.
Peter
From 8f76455acfbfd28d695720507f78dc533f2d7a4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter O'Gorman pe...@pogma.com
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 00:44:48 -0500
Subject:
On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
I'm trying to understand the libtool current:revision:age versioning scheme.
I think I understand how it works, but I noticed that filename of the shared
library seems to get different numbers
I'm trying to understand the libtool current:revision:age versioning
scheme. I think I understand how it works, but I noticed that filename of
the shared library seems to get different numbers
(current-age.age.revision). Is that expected?
The filename generation is dependent on the OS. It
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
# 6. If any interfaces have been removed since the last public release,
# then set age to 0.
Shouldn't step #6 included changed as well as removed? If you change the
interface (for example modifying function parameters), backwards
compatibility is
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Matěj Týč wrote:
If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one
purpose - to inform users what have they installed.
More specifically, it provides libtool with the information needed to
produce a suitably numbered library to satisfy a
On 3 May 2010, at 23:09, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Matěj Týč wrote:
If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one
purpose - to inform users what have they installed.
More specifically, it provides libtool with the information needed to
On 03/05/10 20:00, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Jef,
* Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:08:14AM CEST:
On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
I'm trying to understand the libtool current:revision:age versioning scheme.
I think I
* Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 08:24:09PM CEST:
Yes, I have read the libtool manual, but it doesn't contain much
info about the resulting filename. Most of the info is about the
c:r:a scheme for input, not the output.
Yes, because the output file name is a per-system detail that
Jef Driesen jefdrie...@hotmail.com - Mon, 03 May 2010 20:24:09 +0200
On 03/05/10 20:00, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Jef,
* Jef Driesen wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:08:14AM CEST:
On 02/05/10 03:33, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Jef Driesen wrote:
The git master version of
10 matches
Mail list logo
