On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:01:23AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
> > > or something?
> >
> > I prefer `s
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:01:23AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
> > or something?
>
> I prefer `something' :-)
>
> How about `typedef struct lt_dlhandle_st
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernard Dautrevaux
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:39 AM
> To: 'Alexandre Oliva'; Kevin Atkinson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:53 PM
> To: Kevin Atkinson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Problem with ltdl.h
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 29, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
>> > or something?
>>
>> I prefer `something' :-)
>>
On 29 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
> > or something?
>
> I prefer `something' :-)
>
> How about `typedef struct lt_dlhandle_struct lt_dlhandle'?
I wil
On Nov 28, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about we simply change the name of the struct to lt_handlerecord
> or something?
I prefer `something' :-)
How about `typedef struct lt_dlhandle_struct lt_dlhandle'?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unica
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:53:00PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > in C++
> >> > struct lt_dlhandle
> >> > auto
On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > It does NOT appear
>> > to be valid C++ code
>>
>> I've just managed to compile:
>>
>> typedef struct foo foo;
> Yes that will
On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It does NOT appear
> > to be valid C++ code
>
> I've just managed to compile:
>
> typedef struct foo foo;
Yes that will compile but
typedef struct foo * foo
Won't, which is what the lin
On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > in C++
>> >struct lt_dlhandle
>> > automatically define a TYPENAME i.e. makes an implicit
>> >typedef struct lt_dl
On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > in C++
> > struct lt_dlhandle
> > automatically define a TYPENAME i.e. makes an implicit
> > typedef struct lt_dlhandle lt_dlhandle;
>
> However, IIRC, it is valid to have the i
On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in C++
> struct lt_dlhandle
> automatically define a TYPENAME i.e. makes an implicit
> typedef struct lt_dlhandle lt_dlhandle;
However, IIRC, it is valid to have the implicit name overridden by
another definition of the
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Problem with ltdl.h
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> >
> > I just updat
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> I just updated to the latest CVS version of libtool and I noticed two
> problems.
>
> 1) Even though I defined LT_NON_POSIX_NAMESPACE I still can't get lt_ptr_t
> to work. After looking at the header file I discovered the really is
> LT_FUBAR_NAME
I just updated to the latest CVS version of libtool and I noticed two
problems.
1) Even though I defined LT_NON_POSIX_NAMESPACE I still can't get lt_ptr_t
to work. After looking at the header file I discovered the really is
LT_FUBAR_NAMESPACE. Either the docs or the header files need to be
cha
16 matches
Mail list logo