Den 2010-06-08 18:19 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2010-06-08 15:40 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosinwrote:
I've had enough frustration here, methinks.
Sorry for my contribution to your frustrati
On 6/8/2010 6:47 AM, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
> Peter/Charles,
> Do you have a summary of the capabilities added by your
> patches/branch
I'll let Peter speak for himself, but these are the patches in the
cygwin and mingw distributions:
* Pass various runtime library flags to GCC. (-shared-li
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Den 2010-06-08 15:40 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>>
>>> I've had enough frustration here, methinks.
>>
>> Sorry for my contribution to your frustration. I would just like to
>> see windo
Den 2010-06-08 15:40 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
I've had enough frustration here, methinks.
Sorry for my contribution to your frustration. I would just like to
see windows support in the mainstream to be done right, and the
attitude of "just
Hi Chris,
On 8 Jun 2010, at 20:06, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>
>> I think it important to merge pr-msvc-support into master one way or
>> another so that it doesn't get ignored for any longer than it has already.
>
> I would like it to
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Christopher!
>
> Den 2010-06-08 15:06 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it important to merge pr-msvc-support into master one way or
>>> another so that it doesn't get ign
Hi Christopher!
Den 2010-06-08 15:06 skrev Christopher Hulbert:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
I think it important to merge pr-msvc-support into master one way or
another so that it doesn't get ignored for any longer than it has already.
I would like it to not get ig
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Forgive my jumping in again here...
No problem, at least the subject is being talked about.
>
> On 8 Jun 2010, at 17:47, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> Den 2010-06-08 09:
Hi Chris,
Forgive my jumping in again here...
On 8 Jun 2010, at 17:47, Christopher Hulbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
>>> On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter'
On 8 Jun 2010, at 15:22, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Gary!
Hey Peter!
> Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
>> [[Adding Libtool List]]
>>
>> On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
>>> my pile of pending patc
On 8 June 2010 09:17, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> even if you install mingw cross toolchain on linux ? You can even test
> Windows CE with cegcc on linux
FWIW, my experience is that the mingw cross toolchain on linux is not
a close enough approximation of the "real thing" on Windows; the
problems be
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Gary!
>
> Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
>>
>> [[Adding Libtool List]]
>>
>> On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>> Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
>>> my pile of pending p
[adding Bruno, as author of git-merge-changelog]
On 06/08/2010 04:14 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> I have git-merge-changelog. But my changes on the branch are in ChangeLog,
> and the question was where they should be after the merge, in ChangeLog
> or in ChangeLog.2009. I was not asking how the mer
Den 2010-06-08 11:50 skrev Eric Blake:
On 06/08/2010 02:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
There's already the pr-msvc-support branch, but when I tried to merge
master into it to make it easy to merge back later, the ChangeLog rotation
caused conflicts.
Do you have Bruno Haible's git-merge-changelog pr
On 06/08/2010 02:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> There's already the pr-msvc-support branch, but when I tried to merge
> master into it to make it easy to merge back later, the ChangeLog rotation
> caused conflicts.
Do you have Bruno Haible's git-merge-changelog program installed on your
machine? For
Den 2010-06-08 10:22 skrev Peter Rosin:
It seems odd both to (a) have entries from 2009 in the (future-to-be) 2010
ChangeLog and (b) to make changes to the 2009 ChangeLog at this point.
I see that for the first merge of master into the branch last year I
updated the dates in the ChangeLog so tha
Hi Vincent,
On 8 Jun 2010, at 15:17, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
>> [[Adding Libtool List]]
>>
>> On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
>>> my pile of pending patches, ar
Hi Gary!
Den 2010-06-08 09:34 skrev Gary V. Vaughan:
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending patches, are candidates for this extremely shortened
release cycle.
Regardin
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
my pile of pending patches, are candidates for this extremely shortened
release cycle.
Regarding these
[[Adding Libtool List]]
On 8 Jun 2010, at 08:42, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Which is why I don't think even the Peter's long-ready MSVC patches, nor
> my pile of pending patches, are candidates for this extremely shortened
> release cycle.
Regarding these patches, I honestly have paid very little at
20 matches
Mail list logo
