Hi Ralf, Tim
Here I am playing catch up again.
At first look at the patch I have one concern and that may be what is
contributing to
the failures later reported in this thread.
- In the patch, I think the "$CC -r" should be "$LD -r"
Using the C++ compiler command to do the linking does
[ let's drop libtool@ from replies ]
* Tim Rice wrote on Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 07:37:47PM CET:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I think the patch below should implement this (and add John to
> > THANKS). Can you try it? Thanks.
>
> The test still fails although the pa
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[snip]
> Is this an optimization only, or a necessary thing? IOW, if I omit
> libfoo-1.0 in this "CC -Tprelink_objects" line, would that only
> pessimize link time, or could it affect the link result?
I'll let John answer this
> Anyway, I t
Hello John, Tim,
* John Wolfe wrote on Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:38:41PM CET:
> Happy to contribute where I can. Sorry to not get back to you sooner:
> I actually spent an evening away from the computer.
No problem at all of course.
[ snip explanations ]
> All that is probably more than you want
Hello Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:50:27AM CET:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> : * Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:47:49PM CET:
> : >
> : > Sure, attched as x.tst-without-patch & x.tst-with-patch
> : > I've also attached the curent patch I'm using as
Feb 23, 2009 at 10:47:49PM CET:
: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
: > > * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:29:40PM CET:
: > > >
: > > > I'm trying to understand the cmdline_wrap.at test.
: > > > I've added this patch to fix
'm trying to understand the cmdline_wrap.at test.
: > > > I've added this patch to fix the 2 template tests that were failing
: > > > on UnixWare 7.1.4
: > >
: > > Can you post the verbose output of the test both without and with the
: > > patch? Thanks.
: &
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:47:49PM CET:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:29:40PM CET:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to understand the cmdline_wrap.at test.
> > > I've add
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> * Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:29:40PM CET:
> >
> > I'm trying to understand the cmdline_wrap.at test.
> > I've added this patch to fix the 2 template tests that were failing
&g
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:29:40PM CET:
>
> I'm trying to understand the cmdline_wrap.at test.
> I've added this patch to fix the 2 template tests that were failing
> on UnixWare 7.1.4
Can you post the verbose output of the test both without and w
10 matches
Mail list logo