[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-13 Thread Peter Rosin
Follow-up Comment #14, sr #108201 (project libtool): Regarding the -no-undefined issue, I believe it is correct to set -no-undefined in LDFLAGS in export.at. This is the case since libtool is used to link in that test, and nothing else. Or is LDFLAGS special in some way on Solaris, so

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #5, sr #108201 (project libtool): Here is my feable and first attempt to detect the problem using the testsuite. First, the test export.at seems to work by default, but it is only a gcc (simple 'C') test: richard@devzone:~/src/libtool$ gmake check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS=45 -d cd

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #6, sr #108201 (project libtool): And here is the diff for the proposed patch. After cleanup and rebuilding (seemed like a zillion autoreconfs) running the export tests as indicated (both for standard and CC=g++) are successful. richard@devzone:~/src/libtool$ git diff --staged

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
Follow-up Comment #7, sr #108201 (project libtool): Can you please re-post your patch as a file attachment? It seems that posting as a comment trashes the patch. Do any of the existing libtool test cases test the functionality you are fixing? Also, libtool.m4 is at m4/libtool.m4 in current git

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #8, sr #108201 (project libtool): Bob, please see comment #5 As I indicated, local test n° 45 export.at is the existing test. I added the following line : AT_CHECK([elfdump -d .libs/liba.so | grep SONAME],[], [ignore], [ignore]) to ensure that the SONAME was being added

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #9, sr #108201 (project libtool): BTW Bob, perhaps you didn't catch that I did a $git checkout v2.4.2 since it appears much has changed since the last stable. This is why, I believe, the tests indicate ## GNU Libtool 2.4.2 test suite

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Peter Rosin
Follow-up Comment #10, sr #108201 (project libtool): Dropping -no-undefined from LDFLAGS in export.at kills the test on Windows and it's unacceptable to assume that elfdump exists. Passing -no-undefined to libtool is NOT a misnomer and -no-undefined is in fact a perfectly valid libtool option

Re: [sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Peter Rosin wrote: Follow-up Comment #10, sr #108201 (project libtool): Dropping -no-undefined from LDFLAGS in export.at kills the test on Windows and it's unacceptable to assume that elfdump exists. Passing -no-undefined to libtool is NOT a misnomer and -no-undefined

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-12 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #11, sr #108201 (project libtool): I guess I can add the following: 1. regarding -no-undefined, when I changed this to avoid the syntax error on solaris (which should be, for example, -Wl,--no-undefined), the linker complained that it was a duplicate option implying, I believe

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-11 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #1, sr #108201 (project libtool): trying to bootstrap git base to provide a test case and patch proposal, but I notice some problems already in doing after ./bootstrap ./configure gmake check syntax-check distcheck ## - ## ## Test results

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-11 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
Follow-up Comment #2, sr #108201 (project libtool): I notice that the error message mentions the program name 'sed' rather than 'gsed'. Perhaps two different sed programs are being used? It seems likely that the 'sed' which failed is Solaris 'sed' rather than GNU 'sed

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-11 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #3, sr #108201 (project libtool): Hello Bob, I wonder too, which is why I indicated at the end of my last comment: does libtool not like pkgsrc version of sed? richard@devzone:~/src/libtool$ which sed /opt/pkg/gnu/bin/sed richard@devzone:~/src/libtool$ grep 'SED

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-11 Thread Richard PALO
Follow-up Comment #4, sr #108201 (project libtool): I was working off of master. With git blame I noticed that the strcmp problem was introduced recently, so I'm trying over after git checkout v2.4.2, which is the latest tarball version I've tested with pkgsrc. HEAD is now at fdb4c54... Release

Re: [sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-11 Thread Dennis Clarke
- Original Message - From: Bob Friesenhahn invalid.nore...@gnu.org Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:57 am Subject: [sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x To: Richard PALO richard.p...@baou.fr, Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us

Re: [sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-11 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Dennis Clarke wrote: Follow-up Comment #2, sr #108201 (project libtool): I notice that the error message mentions the program name 'sed' rather than 'gsed'. Perhaps two different sed programs are being used? It seems likely that the 'sed' which failed is Solaris 'sed

[sr #108201] libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x

2012-12-10 Thread Richard PALO
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?108201 Summary: libtool problems with -export-symbols-regex on solaris with gcc-4.7.x Project: GNU Libtool Submitted by: risto3 Submitted on: lun. 10 déc. 2012 13:58:02 GMT Category

Is it possible to force GNU libtool to use the Solaris CC compiller instead of GCC?

2012-12-10 Thread Frank Chang
Good morning, I was curious whether it is possible to force GNU libtool to use the Solaris CC compiller instead of GCC? If so, how might that be done? Thank you ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Is it possible to force GNU libtool to use the Solaris CC compiller instead of GCC?

2012-12-10 Thread Robert Boehne
./configure ... CXX=/opt/solarisstudio12.3/bin/CC CC=/opt/solarisstudio12.3/bin/cc On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Frank Chang frank_chan...@hotmail.comwrote: Good morning, I was curious whether it is possible to force GNU libtool to use the Solaris CC compiller instead of GCC? If so, how

RE: Is it possible to force GNU libtool to use the Solaris CC compiller instead of GCC?

2012-12-10 Thread Frank Chang
. Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:18:50 -0600 Subject: Re: Is it possible to force GNU libtool to use the Solaris CC compiller instead of GCC? From: rboe...@gmail.com To: frank_chan...@hotmail.com CC: libtool@gnu.org ./configure ... CXX=/opt/solarisstudio12.3/bin/CC CC=/opt/solarisstudio12.3/bin/cc

Re: Automake, Libtool and AM_PROG_AR

2012-11-26 Thread Stefano Lattarini
ahead and close the bug report, leaving the matter in the hands of the libtoolers. I've closed this report now. Regards, Stefano ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Automake, Libtool and AM_PROG_AR (was: Re: bug#11401: automake-1.12 (incorrectly?) complains about missing AM_PROG_AR)

2012-11-21 Thread Stefano Lattarini
, but with automake 1.12: $ autoreconf -f -i ... ltlibrary.am: warning: 'libfoo.la': linking libtool libraries using a non-POSIX ltlibrary.am: archiver requires 'AM_PROG_AR' in 'configure.ac' Makefile.am:1: while processing Libtool library 'libfoo.la' what gives ? If you don't want *all* warnings

Re: libtool 2.4.2 fails to compile on Solaris 10

2012-11-17 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-11-16 21:02, Dennis Clarke wrote: So I guess we have progress here .. sort of. Good! $ pwd /usr/local/build/libtool-2.4.2_Nov_06_0153_SunOS5.10_sparcv9 $ cp -p ./test-suite.log libtool-2.4.2_Nov_06_0153_SunOS5.10_sparcv9_test-suite.log see attached testsuite log file. If you

Re: libtool 2.4.2 fails to compile on Solaris 10

2012-11-17 Thread Dennis Clarke
___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-340-g34fe402

2012-11-12 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 34fe402efa1e969cf902cf7370e29564c005d508 (commit) via

libtool 2.4.2 fails to compile on Solaris 10

2012-11-06 Thread Dennis Clarke
/usr/local/src/libtool-2.4.2.tar.gz /usr/local/src/libtasn1-2.14.tar.gz /usr/local/src/libtool_git_Mon_Nov_05_2012.star.gz $ /usr/sfw/bin/openssl dgst -sha1 /usr/local/src/libtool-2.4.2.tar.gz SHA1(/usr/local/src/libtool-2.4.2.tar.gz

Re: libtool 2.4.2 fails to compile on Solaris 10

2012-11-06 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-11-06 12:45, Peter Rosin wrote: The lt_libltdl_LTX_preloaded_symbols symbol is supposed to be in an automatically generated file, which isn't generated because configure does not recognize the $NM output. Libtool wants BSD style output. hex address symbol type symbol name e.g

[PATCH 1/9] libtool: add -shortname option

2012-11-04 Thread KO Myung-Hun
++ 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 081e82f..33beb68 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ New in 2.4.2 2011-10-17: git version 2.4.1a, Libtool team: package names. This can be used to build some static libraries with PIC

[PATCH 2/9] libtool: don't eliminate duplications in $postdeps and $predeps on OS/2

2012-11-04 Thread KO Myung-Hun
* build-aux/ltmain.h(libtool_validate_options): Add *os2* to the list. --- build-aux/ltmain.in |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/build-aux/ltmain.in b/build-aux/ltmain.in index 4e53936..ede32eb 100644 --- a/build-aux/ltmain.in +++ b/build-aux/ltmain.in @@

[PATCH 3/9] libtool: set lt_prog_compiler_static to -Bstatic on OS/2

2012-11-04 Thread KO Myung-Hun
* m4/libtool.m4(_LT_COMPILER_PIC): Same as the title. --- m4/libtool.m4 | 15 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/m4/libtool.m4 b/m4/libtool.m4 index f269fc4..3d36d5d 100644 --- a/m4/libtool.m4 +++ b/m4/libtool.m4 @@ -3901,6 +3901,11 @@ m4_if([$1],

[PATCH 5/9] libtool: there is no need to relink DLLs on OS/2

2012-11-04 Thread KO Myung-Hun
*build-aux/ltmain.in(func_mode_link): Set need_relink to no on OS/2. --- build-aux/ltmain.in |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/build-aux/ltmain.in b/build-aux/ltmain.in index ede32eb..10396a7 100644 --- a/build-aux/ltmain.in +++ b/build-aux/ltmain.in @@

[PATCH 6/9] libtool: set lt_cv_deplibs_check_method to pass_all on OS/2

2012-11-04 Thread KO Myung-Hun
*m4/libtool.m4(_LT_CHECK_MAGIC_METHOD): Same as the title. --- m4/libtool.m4 |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/m4/libtool.m4 b/m4/libtool.m4 index 3d36d5d..3a80989 100644 --- a/m4/libtool.m4 +++ b/m4/libtool.m4 @@ -3345,6 +3345,9 @@ sysv4 | sysv4.3*)

[PATCH 8/9] libtool: create an import libraries instead of links to the real library on OS/2

2012-11-04 Thread KO Myung-Hun
Link is not supported on OS/2. *build-aux/ltmain.in(fund_mode_install): Create an import library. (fund_mode_link): Likewise. --- build-aux/ltmain.in | 23 --- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/build-aux/ltmain.in b/build-aux/ltmain.in index

[PATCH 2/3] libtool: unify the global symbol transformations

2012-11-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Since it is safe for $lt_cv_sys_global_symbol_to_cdecl to match with a simple /^T .* .*$/ type expression, it is ok for the other transformations as well. At least if you require at least one $symcode at the start of the line, so that the just generated output doesn't match the next sed

[PATCH 1/3] libtool: break up long lines

2012-11-02 Thread Peter Rosin
* m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_CMD_GLOBAL_SYMBOLS): Break up long lines when assigning the sed scripts that transform the extracted symbol lines. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se --- m4/libtool.m4 | 16 +--- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 3/3] libtool: add @INIT@ to the preloader, for data imports on Windows

2012-11-02 Thread Peter Rosin
for imported data symbols. Add new lt_cv_sys_global_symbol_to_import which finds imported data symbols if non-empty and export this variable to the libtool script in the global_symbol_to_import variable. Adjust lt_cv_sys_global_symbol_pipe so that data imports can be located. * build-aux/ltmain.in

Re: Libtool is linking the wrong library (location) in and I can't figure out what's causing it.

2012-10-27 Thread Jim Lynch
On 10/26/2012 07:22 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote: Sorry if this is terse, I'm on my phone. In the first case, you're using a library, liblog4cplus.so, that's installed in your home directory. Libtool sees this as outside the dynamic linker's path and adds a runpath so you're program will find

Libtool is linking the wrong library (location) in and I can't figure out what's causing it.

2012-10-26 Thread Jim Lynch
/liblog4cplus.so -pthread -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/jwl/build/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/jwl/build/usr/local/lib whereas the last bit of the one that works has: libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -o vaprobe protoarduino.o pdbutil.o timer.o arcserver.o probethread.o protocamera.o protosimple.o vaprobe.o

Re: Libtool is linking the wrong library (location) in and I can't figure out what's causing it.

2012-10-26 Thread Dan Nicholson
. Libtool sees this as outside the dynamic linker's path and adds a runpath so you're program will find the library at runtime without setting any environment variables. This is either helpful or a nuisance depending on your perspective. One thing I'd suggest is rather than toying with prefix, which

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-336-gcdd7f33

2012-10-25 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via cdd7f33f06e5864fdf0d13731398f5021e285647 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-337-g9f2b41f

2012-10-25 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 9f2b41f6d9a74e9d4e3a3d959da0e81a3f5d7a23 (commit) from

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-323-gf1a3325

2012-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via f1a3325bf86a015d28930982bfa28f9c63621745 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-325-gd5c1465

2012-10-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via d5c146580c21ee603458d92983d27e7af1260667 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-321-g7b059d5

2012-10-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 7b059d5ad9ed1d35ba6aa0f4fb01501b07fdd6c3 (commit) from

Re: Solaris 10 failures with latest git libtool

2012-10-22 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
): ## -- ## ## Detailed failed tests. ## ## -- ## # -*- compilation -*- 21. libtool.at:60: testing quote shell meta-characters in filenames ... /home/bfriesen/src/gnu/libtool-head/tests/libtool.at:101: $LIBTOOL -n --mode=$mode $preargs $preflag$flag:test

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-320-gc82eaf3

2012-10-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via c82eaf360b1d2797054296c5e894c1271fffb7cf (commit) from

Solaris 10 failures with latest git libtool

2012-10-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
With today's development libtool, I am seeing a number of errors like # -*- compilation -*- 8. libtoolize.at:378: testing diagnose missing LT_CONFIG_LTDL_DIR ... /home/bfriesen/src/gnu/libtool-head/tests/libtoolize.at:437: $LIBTOOLIZE --copy --install --ltdl=ltdl

Re: Solaris 10 failures with latest git libtool

2012-10-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: Solaris 10 failures with latest git libtool

2012-10-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
it has stayed hidden for so long! :-o Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org) ___ https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-309-g6c51572

2012-10-19 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 6c51572ae0748629da0144ed5b640a3e7abc35d3 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-311-g0dd94ed

2012-10-19 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 0dd94ed521e52ca901e845b39bbc33f16174a325 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-314-g05bd3f8

2012-10-19 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 05bd3f8b862effa756b2bd1aa52a6926914290cd (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-296-gcfcb7af

2012-10-18 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via cfcb7afd26a2c41f3dae62766002cac570417c77 (commit) from

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-299-ga3b0645

2012-10-18 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via a3b06455e9c78ba5d3b7261f1c1d6e51029f6335 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-300-g92b77ed

2012-10-18 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 92b77ed8bbf615ff2ed7710d9da1aae2e97755e8 (commit) from

libtool: fix spelling nit

2012-10-18 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! I have pushed the below patch. Cheers, Peter From cfcb7afd26a2c41f3dae62766002cac570417c77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:27:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] libtool: fix spelling nit * build-aux/ltmain.in (func_generate_dlsyms): Fix

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-282-gb3e96ce

2012-10-08 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via b3e96ce7d1566d6120112f3b10e7782cc62cff8d (commit) from

user_search_path vs libtool --mode=execute -dlopen

2012-10-07 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hello all, I'm a Guile developer who is trying to figure out the best way to add a Guile-specific 'extensions' directory to the library search path, while retaining the ability of 'libtool --mode=execute -dlopen' to take precedence over our default extensions directory. As I understand

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-278-g5962e9a

2012-10-06 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 5962e9ab32b54d37d5cece3dea56cdd3fcf1f914 (commit) from

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-280-gb78fd97

2012-10-06 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via b78fd9740ef6a2ed67a1ef14e76483af784fb5f0 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-250-g0b1b671

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 0b1b67186407f1b03cc0c5bf1882a8db8e0ee2e2 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-251-g9847559

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 9847559cef654e7ae587aea13b2a084ab2a5eb40 (commit) from

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-275-ga61a111

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via a61a1114ae1464c39b54e88d1a30735c7daca4b2 (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-276-g991b5e5

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 991b5e52a77c4705614387b370219b3a24e9dc1c (commit) from

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
. Awesome. I'll push the merge now, along with some other resurrected patches that got stuck in the review queue last year. Now into nitpicking and other useless ramblings... The patch libtool: unroll nested if into a single case statement has whitespace issues (leading spaces instead of tabs

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-05 13:15, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. ARRRGH! I assume this is what you referred to when you talked about some stuff

Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am diff --git a/tests/cdemo.at b/tests/cdemo.at index f50106c..885845c 100644 --- a/tests/cdemo.at +++ b/tests/cdemo.at @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ int main () } ]]) -AT_DATA([expout], +LT_AT_HOST_DATA([expout], [[Welcome to GNU libtool cdemo! ** This is libfoo ** hello returned: 57616

Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, Apologies for having entirely forgotten about the old thread reviewing those patches first time around. And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users care about, without spending hundreds

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Eric Blake
that libtool users care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would never use for anything else? It pretty much sucks that everytime I push a well tested (on various Unix varieties) patch, that Windows likes to blow up gratuitously. I don't mind wasting a bit of time checking

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Peter Rosin
that libtool users care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would never use for anything else? It pretty much sucks that everytime I push a well tested (on various Unix varieties) patch, that Windows likes to blow up gratuitously. I don't mind wasting a bit of time checking things

Re: Windows Line Endings [WAS Re: [SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-273-ge24f183]

2012-10-05 Thread Charles Wilson
On 10/5/2012 12:03 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: And thanks for looking into it. Is there a legal way to get access to Windows and the various flavours of gcc and MSVC that libtool users care about, without spending hundreds of dollars on software I would never use for anything else? Yes. MS

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-10-03 Thread Peter Rosin
the world a better place! :-) I just fired up a test suite run... Good news! Clean runs on Cygwin, MSYS/MinGW and MSYS/MSVC. Thanks! I'm crossing my fingers -- I'll sleep a lot better when we've put this one behind us. Now into nitpicking and other useless ramblings... The patch libtool: unroll

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, gary/reredo-test-operand-order, created. v2.4.2-191-gd2dcd00

2012-10-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, gary/reredo-test-operand-order has been created at d2dcd0094901ca961a4690647d17f887eb26208f (commit

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-10-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, Sorry for the delay, it was more complicated than I had imagined :-o On 28 Sep 2012, at 11:08, Gary V. Vaughan g...@gnu.org wrote: On 27 ก.ย. 2012, at 5:03, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: On 2012-09-26 14:57, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-09-22 05:31, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-10-02 Thread Peter Rosin
[snipped loads of stuff] On 2012-10-02 16:54, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: The new branch gary/reredo-test-operand-order (notice the double re) has everything broken down into digestible chunks. All the differences between that and master now look like improvements upon the original hand rolled

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-10-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On Oct 3, 2012, at 12:32 AM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: [snipped loads of stuff] [snipped a bit more stuff] You're saying that you are about to: $ git checkout master $ git merge --strategy=recursive -X theirs gary/reredo-test-operand-order \ -m 'bla bla bla'

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-27 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, On 27 ก.ย. 2012, at 5:03, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: On 2012-09-26 14:57, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-09-22 05:31, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: [Heavily snipped] Why not commit the sc_prohibit_test_const_follows_var improvement last, after fixing all violations? That

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
with seven changesets that reverts the manual version of the buggy original and redoes it with a painstaking awk script (also checked in, for the morbidly curious). I'm on the fence about committing in smaller pieces... the policy for libtool has always been to make sure the testsuite passes

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-26 Thread Peter Rosin
-test-operand-order to savannah with seven changesets that reverts the manual version of the buggy original and redoes it with a painstaking awk script (also checked in, for the morbidly curious). I'm on the fence about committing in smaller pieces... the policy for libtool has always been

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-09-26 14:57, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-09-22 05:31, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: [Heavily snipped] Why not commit the sc_prohibit_test_const_follows_var improvement last, after fixing all violations? That doesn't make sense, sorry. But the idea would have worked initially, before the

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, gary/redo-test-operand-order, created. v2.4.2-184-g8aec004

2012-09-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, gary/redo-test-operand-order has been created at 8aec0042b11b5e4f6c069260798fdaa4f0b715b5 (commit) - Log

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-21 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
changesets that reverts the manual version of the buggy original and redoes it with a painstaking awk script (also checked in, for the morbidly curious). I'm on the fence about committing in smaller pieces... the policy for libtool has always been to make sure the testsuite passes (at least

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-177-gd674eaa

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via d674eaa44cc8ce0ea3d148cfd43f243c3c819e2d (commit) from

[PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Rosin
and library_names which are empty when no shared library is built): @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ inherited_linker_flags='' # Libraries that this one depends upon. -dependency_libs=' -R/home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047/foobar ' +dependency_libs=' -R/home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Rosin
with this patch is this (I have elided changes to dlopen and library_names which are empty when no shared library is built): @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ inherited_linker_flags='' # Libraries that this one depends upon. -dependency_libs=' -R/home/peda/libtool/git/cygwin/tests/testsuite.dir/047

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Rosin
? The relevant difference in libb.la with this patch is this (I have elided changes to dlopen and library_names which are empty when no shared library is built): @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ inherited_linker_flags='' # Libraries that this one depends upon. -dependency_libs=' -R/home/peda/libtool

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-19 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Peter, My bad, I'm embarrassed to say. I started to write a script to make the appropriate changes, but ended up doing it manually rather than adding more and more corner cases to the throwaway script... a poor choice in hindsight :-( On 19 ก.ย. 2012, at 19:27, Peter Rosin

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-09-19 16:20, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi Peter, My bad, I'm embarrassed to say. I started to write a script to make the appropriate changes, but ended up doing it manually rather than adding more and more corner cases to the throwaway script... a poor choice in hindsight :-( It's

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-19 Thread Roumen Petrov
Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-09-19 09:31, Peter Rosin wrote: * tests/runpath-in-lalib.at: Make sure shared libraries are created on Windows by passing -no-undefined. Otherwise libb.la fails to record a dependency on liba.la, and the final link of the program then fails with undefined symbols.

Re: [PATCH] tests: feed -no-undefined when linking libtool libraries

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-09-19 21:32, Roumen Petrov wrote: Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-09-19 09:31, Peter Rosin wrote: * tests/runpath-in-lalib.at: Make sure shared libraries are created on Windows by passing -no-undefined. Otherwise libb.la fails to record a dependency on liba.la, and the final link of the

[sr #107959] Libtool generates invalid .def files

2012-08-30 Thread anonymous
Additional Item Attachment, sr #107959 (project libtool): File name: 01-def-syntax.patchSize:0 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107959 ___ Message

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-161-g9b726f3

2012-08-21 Thread Peter O'Gorman
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 9b726f35db98da01a7edaf143788cba2c2ae900a (commit) via

[SCM] GNU Libtool branch, master, updated. v2.4.2-158-g00ed018

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Rosin
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project GNU Libtool. The branch, master has been updated via 00ed0187c1c6cc3519188bc47d5ed0ff85f2d950 (commit) from

Re: libtool quoting error

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-08-19 22:18, Peter Rosin wrote: Oops, forgot a couple of backslashes, trying again. Sorry for the noise. Testsuite running, just in case... The patch does not seem to affect the testsuite, so I'll push in a few days. Unless someone speaks up against it of course. Cheers, Peter

Re: libtool quoting error

2012-08-20 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-08-19 22:18, Peter Rosin wrote: Oops, forgot a couple of backslashes, trying again. Sorry for the noise. Testsuite running, just in case... The patch does not seem to affect the testsuite, so I'll push in a few days. Unless someone speaks up

Re: libtool quoting error

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-08-20 16:14, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2012-08-19 22:18, Peter Rosin wrote: Oops, forgot a couple of backslashes, trying again. Sorry for the noise. Testsuite running, just in case... The patch does not seem to affect the testsuite, so

Re: libtool quoting error

2012-08-19 Thread Peter Rosin
[Cygwinners: Taking this to the Libtool lists] [Libtoolers: Following up on a post on the cygwin mailing list] On 2012-08-19 19:03, Andreas Schiffler wrote: The libtool distributed with cygwin has a bug that prevents use in paths containing spaces. This was encountered when trying to build

Re: libtool quoting error

2012-08-19 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-08-19 22:09, Peter Rosin wrote: [Cygwinners: Taking this to the Libtool lists] [Libtoolers: Following up on a post on the cygwin mailing list] On 2012-08-19 19:03, Andreas Schiffler wrote: The libtool distributed with cygwin has a bug that prevents use in paths containing spaces

HELP: libtool 2.4.2 not compiling on Solaris 10u10 Sparc

2012-08-19 Thread Jeff Martin
Hello, I am trying to compile libtool so I can install another package which requires it. I have successfully compiled M4, Automake, Autoconf and installed in /usr/gnu. When I try to do the same for libtool, I receive errors. I have tried the following: ./configure --prefix=/usr/gnu /usr/css

Re: HELP: libtool 2.4.2 not compiling on Solaris 10u10 Sparc

2012-08-19 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, Jeff Martin wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile libtool so I can install another package which requires it. I have successfully compiled M4, Automake, Autoconf and installed in /usr/gnu. When I try to do the same for libtool, I receive errors. I have tried the following

Re: HELP: libtool 2.4.2 not compiling on Solaris 10u10 Sparc

2012-08-19 Thread Jeff Martin
Bob, Yes it was pulled from gnu.org. -rw-r--r--   1 root root 2632347 Oct 18  2011 libtool-2.4.2.tar.gz I used: wget http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-2.4.2.tar.gz to retrieve the source. Thanks, Jeff - Original Message - From: Bob

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >