>
> Duft Markus wrote:
>
> >>> Patches that do more good than harm are likely to be accepted.
> >> That's exactly the point i'm unsure about, if I do more harm than
> good
> >> or the other way round :) of course, for _me_ I do more good, but
> does
> >> it harm others that the hardcode test fail
Duft Markus wrote:
>>> Patches that do more good than harm are likely to be accepted.
>> That's exactly the point i'm unsure about, if I do more harm than good
>> or the other way round :) of course, for _me_ I do more good, but does
>> it harm others that the hardcode test fails now?
Sorry, don'
>
> >
> > Duft Markus wrote:
> >
> > > But anyway, for me right now small side effects or very special
> > > special-cases would not matter that much. It would be much more
> > > important to get DESTDIR to work. However it would still be more
> than
> > > cool to get DESTDIR support in upstream l
Duft Markus wrote:
> But anyway, for me right now small side effects or very special
> special-cases would not matter that much. It would be much more
> important to get DESTDIR to work. However it would still be more than
> cool to get DESTDIR support in upstream libtool, without having to apply
>
> Markus Duft wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm working (together with haubi) on getting DESTDIR support for our
> > hppa-hpux boxes into libtool. I now have it working, and a first
> patch
> > (which of course breaks some other things - I know that :( ), and
> wanted to
> > ask what you think about thi
Markus Duft wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm working (together with haubi) on getting DESTDIR support for our
> hppa-hpux boxes into libtool. I now have it working, and a first patch
> (which of course breaks some other things - I know that :( ), and wanted to
> ask what you think about this.
>
> I'm adding +
Hi
I'm working (together with haubi) on getting DESTDIR support for our
hppa-hpux boxes into libtool. I now have it working, and a first patch
(which of course breaks some other things - I know that :( ), and wanted to
ask what you think about this.
I'm adding +s to every link line. But because I
